Literature DB >> 21649854

Preferred information sources for clinical decision making: critical care nurses' perceptions of information accessibility and usefulness.

Andrea P Marshall1, Sandra H West, Leanne M Aitken.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Variability in clinical practice may result from the use of diverse information sources to guide clinical decisions. In routine clinical practice, nurses privilege information from colleagues over more formal information sources. It is not clear whether similar information-seeking behaviour is exhibited when critical care nurses make decisions about a specific clinical practice, where extensive practice variability exists alongside a developing research base.
PURPOSE: This study explored the preferred sources of information intensive care nurses used and their perceptions of the accessibility and usefulness of this information for making decisions in clinically uncertain situations specific to enteral feeding practice.
METHODS: An instrumental case study design, incorporating concurrent verbal protocols, Q methodology and focus groups, was used to determine intensive care nurses' perspectives of information use in the resolution of clinical uncertainty.
FINDINGS: A preference for information from colleagues to support clinical decisions was observed. People as information sources were considered most useful and most accessible in the clinical setting. Text and electronic information sources were seen as less accessible, mainly because of the time required to access the information within the documents. DISCUSSION: When faced with clinical uncertainty, obtaining information from colleagues allows information to be quickly accessed and applied within the context of a specific clinical presentation. Seeking information from others also provides opportunities for shared decision-making and potential validation of clinical judgment, although differing views may exacerbate clinical uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The social exchange of clinical information may meet the needs of nurses working in a complex, time-pressured environment but the extent of the evidence base for information passed through verbal communication is unclear. The perceived usefulness and accessibility of information is premised on the ease of use and access and thus the variability in information may be contributing to clinical uncertainty.
Copyright ©2011 Sigma Theta Tau International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21649854     DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2011.00221.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs        ISSN: 1545-102X            Impact factor:   2.931


  11 in total

1.  PICU Nurses' Pain Assessments and Intervention Choices for Virtual Human and Written Vignettes.

Authors:  Cynthia M LaFond; Catherine Van Hulle Vincent; Colleen Corte; Patricia E Hershberger; Andrew Johnson; Chang G Park; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.145

2.  Nurses' Utilization of Information Resources for Patient Care Tasks: A Survey of Critical Care Nurses in an Urban Hospital Setting.

Authors:  Rebecca J L Brown; Martin Michalowski
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 2.146

3.  Australian graduating nurses' knowledge, intentions and beliefs on infection prevention and control: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Brett G Mitchell; Richard Say; Anne Wells; Fiona Wilson; Linda Cloete; Lucinda Matheson
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2014-12-12

Review 4.  How Health Care Professionals Use Social Media to Create Virtual Communities: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Kaye Rolls; Margaret Hansen; Debra Jackson; Doug Elliott
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Intensive care nurses on social media: An exploration of knowledge exchange on an intensive care virtual community of practice.

Authors:  Kaye Denise Rolls; Margaret M Hansen; Debra Jackson; Doug Elliott
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.036

6.  CogChamps: impact of a project to educate nurses about delirium and improve the quality of care for hospitalized patients with cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Catherine Travers; Amanda Henderson; Frederick Graham; Elizabeth Beattie
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Nurses and internet health-related information: review on access and utility.

Authors:  Muayyad M Ahmad; Ruba Musallam; Abla Habeeb Allah
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2018-07-31

8.  Collaboration and Satisfaction About Care Decisions in Team questionnaire-Psychometric testing of the Norwegian version, and hospital healthcare personnel perceptions across hospital units.

Authors:  Oddveig Reiersdal Aaberg; Marie Louise Hall-Lord; Sissel Iren Eikeland Husebø; Randi Ballangrud
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2019-02-20

9.  Communication tools and sources of education and information: a national survey of rural and remote nurses.

Authors:  Julie Kosteniuk; Norma J Stewart; Erin C Wilson; Kelly L Penz; Ruth Martin-Misener; Debra G Morgan; Chandima Karunanayake; Martha L P MacLeod
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01

10.  Why We Belong - Exploring Membership of Healthcare Professionals in an Intensive Care Virtual Community Via Online Focus Groups: Rationale and Protocol.

Authors:  Kaye Rolls; Margaret Hansen; Debra Jackson; Doug Elliott
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.