OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate whether the pepsin immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of the laryngeal mucosa epithelia is an available test for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Biopsy specimens from interarytenoid mucosa of LPR patients (seven acid LPR and eight nonacid LPR) and 21 sex- and age-matched normal controls were obtained for pepsin IHC staining. The diagnosis of LPR was based on 24-hour combined multichannel intraluminal esophageal impedance pH monitoring. The results of IHC staining were semiquantitatively analyzed and scored as negative (-), weakly positive (+), moderately positive (++), and strongly positive (+++). RESULTS: Six of seven acid LPR (85.7%) and six of eight nonacid LPR (75%) mucosa samples were moderate to strongly positive for intracellular pepsin. By contrast, only three of 21 normal controls (14.3%) were moderately positive. The difference in intracellular pepsin between LPR and the normal laryngeal mucosa was statistically significant (P < .01). No significant difference in intracellular pepsin was observed between the acid and nonacid LPR mucosal samples (P = .453). Using weak positivity (+) as a cutpoint, the presence of intracellular pepsin in the laryngeal mucosa had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 47.6% in detecting LPR (P < .05). However, using the moderate positivity (++) as the cutpoint, the pepsin had a slightly decreased sensitivity of 80% but a sharply increased specificity of 85.7% (P < .05) in the detection of LPR. CONCLUSIONS: Pepsin IHC staining of the laryngeal mucosa appears to be a sensitive and specific test for diagnosing LPR in a clinical application.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate whether the pepsin immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of the laryngeal mucosa epithelia is an available test for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Biopsy specimens from interarytenoid mucosa of LPR patients (seven acid LPR and eight nonacid LPR) and 21 sex- and age-matched normal controls were obtained for pepsin IHC staining. The diagnosis of LPR was based on 24-hour combined multichannel intraluminal esophageal impedance pH monitoring. The results of IHC staining were semiquantitatively analyzed and scored as negative (-), weakly positive (+), moderately positive (++), and strongly positive (+++). RESULTS: Six of seven acid LPR (85.7%) and six of eight nonacid LPR (75%) mucosa samples were moderate to strongly positive for intracellular pepsin. By contrast, only three of 21 normal controls (14.3%) were moderately positive. The difference in intracellular pepsin between LPR and the normal laryngeal mucosa was statistically significant (P < .01). No significant difference in intracellular pepsin was observed between the acid and nonacid LPR mucosal samples (P = .453). Using weak positivity (+) as a cutpoint, the presence of intracellular pepsin in the laryngeal mucosa had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 47.6% in detecting LPR (P < .05). However, using the moderate positivity (++) as the cutpoint, the pepsin had a slightly decreased sensitivity of 80% but a sharply increased specificity of 85.7% (P < .05) in the detection of LPR. CONCLUSIONS: Pepsin IHC staining of the laryngeal mucosa appears to be a sensitive and specific test for diagnosing LPR in a clinical application.
Authors: Martin Formánek; Pavel Komínek; Petr Matoušek; Radoslava Tomanova; Ondřej Urban; Karol Zeleník Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 2.260
Authors: Martin Formánek; Pavel Komínek; Debora Jančatová; Lucia Staníková; Radoslava Tomanová; Jana Vaculová; Milan Urík; Ivo Šlapák; Karol Zeleník Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2019-02-10 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Giannicola Iannella; Claudio Vicini; Antonella Polimeni; Antonio Greco; Riccardo Gobbi; Filippo Montevecchi; Andrea De Vito; Giuseppe Meccariello; Giovanni Cammaroto; Giovanni D'Agostino; Annalisa Pace; Raffaella Cascella; Marco Brunori; Cristina Anna Maria Lo Iacono; Stefano Pelucchi; Giuseppe Magliulo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Rocco Plateroti; Marta Sacchetti; Giuseppe Magliulo; Andrea Maria Plateroti; Annalisa Pace; Antonietta Moramarco; Alessandro Lambiase; Alice Bruscolini Journal: Life (Basel) Date: 2020-09-15