Literature DB >> 21647893

Follow-up after gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: volumetric and axial control rates.

Ferdinand C A Timmer1, Patrick E J Hanssens, Anniek E van Haren, Jakobus J van Overbeeke, Jef J S Mulder, Cor W R J Cremers, Kees Graamans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: A prospective long-term follow-up study was conducted to evaluate the results of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients. Both axial and volumetric measurements are used to determine tumor size during follow-up. STUDY
DESIGN: Individual prospective cohort study.
METHODS: A total of 110 VS patients were referred for radiosurgery between 2002 and 2007. All patients were treated with a Leksell 4C gamma knife. There were 12.5 to 13 Gy prescribed to the isodose covering 90% of the tumor volume. The resulting marginal dose was on average 11.0 Gy (range, 9.3-12.5 Gy). Tumor size and tumor volume were determined before and after gamma knife treatment at regular intervals. The minimal follow-up period was 2 years.
RESULTS: There were 100 patients included in the study. Eight patients needed additional treatment after a mean follow-up period of 38 months. One patient experienced a temporary facial nerve deficit. No growth pattern could be recognized for tumor growth after GKRS. Based on the measurements of the largest extrameatal diameter, the tumor size would have decreased or remained stable in 94%. Based on volumetric measurement, the tumor size was decreased or remained stable in 79%.
CONCLUSIONS: High tumor control and low complication rates make GKRS a good therapy for VS. If tumor growth occurs after GKRS, a conservative management can be considered because continued tumor growth is uncertain. The extrameatal diameter on axial magnetic resonance imaging seems to be a reliable parameter of the size of a VS. Volumetry is the preferred method to assess the dimensions of a VS, although the consequences of strong volumetric increase, especially in small tumors, can be different depending on individual differences in tumor size.
Copyright © 2011 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21647893     DOI: 10.1002/lary.21763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  8 in total

1.  3D quantitative assessment of response to fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and single-session stereotactic radiosurgery of vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  T Schneider; J Chapiro; M Lin; J F Geschwind; L Kleinberg; D Rigamonti; I Jusué-Torres; A E Marciscano; D M Yousem
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Modern Gamma Knife radiosurgery of vestibular schwannomas: treatment concept, volumetric tumor response, and functional results.

Authors:  Samuel M Lipski; Motohiro Hayashi; Mikhail Chernov; Marc Levivier; Yoshikazu Okada
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Follow-up MR findings of spinal foraminal nerve sheath tumors after stereotactic irradiation.

Authors:  Hyo Jin Kang; Yoon Joon Hwang; Yong Hoon Kim; Su Young Kim; Byung Hoon Lee; Moon-Jun Sohn
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guideline.

Authors:  May N Tsao; Arjun Sahgal; Wei Xu; Antonio De Salles; Motohiro Hayashi; Marc Levivier; Lijun Ma; Roberto Martinez; Jean Régis; Sam Ryu; Ben J Slotman; Ian Paddick
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2017

Review 5.  Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: Tumor Control Probability Analyses and Recommended Reporting Standards.

Authors:  Scott G Soltys; Michael T Milano; Jinyu Xue; Wolfgang A Tomé; Ellen Yorke; Jason Sheehan; George X Ding; John P Kirkpatrick; Lijun Ma; Arjun Sahgal; Timothy Solberg; John Adler; Jimm Grimm; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 8.013

6.  Identifying predictors of early growth response and adverse radiation effects of vestibular schwannomas to radiosurgery.

Authors:  Soroush Larjani; Eric Monsalves; Houman Pebdani; Boris Krischek; Fred Gentili; Michael Cusimano; Normand Laperriere; Caroline Hayhurst; Gelareh Zadeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Long-term volumetric analysis of vestibular schwannomas following stereotactic radiotherapy: Practical implications for follow-up.

Authors:  O Fouard; J F Daisne; M Wanet; M Regnier; T Gustin
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-12-09

8.  A comparison of semi-automated volumetric vs linear measurement of small vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Samuel MacKeith; Tilak Das; Martin Graves; Andrew Patterson; Neil Donnelly; Richard Mannion; Patrick Axon; James Tysome
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.503

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.