Literature DB >> 21647795

Multicentric GISCoR Study "intensive clinical follow-up versus surgical radicalization after complete endoscopic polypectomy of a malignant adenoma" (SEC-GISCoR).

Bruno Andreoni1, Lorenzo Camellini, Angelica Sonzogni, Cristiano Crosta, Maria Elena Pirola, Carlo Corbellini.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer screening programs result in an early diagnosis of the disease. In 2007, 250 malignant polyps were identified in Lombardy, out of 1,329 screen-detected colorectal carcinomas. The Italian Group for Colorectal Cancer (GISCoR) promoted the multicentric study "Endoscopic Follow-up versus Surgical Radicalization of Malignant Polyps after Complete Endoscopic Polypectomy" (SEC-GISCoR). The protocol was a multicentric, prospective, observational, non-randomized study. It included patients diagnosed a colorectal malignant adenoma, after complete endoscopic removal. From November 2005 to September 2009, three participating centers enrolled 120 patients with malignant polyps after "complete" endoscopic polypectomy; malignant polyps were classified as "low risk" or "high risk". The study had two arms: "Intensive follow-up" (42 patients: 32 with low-risk and 10 with high-risk polyps) and "Surgical radicalization" (78 patients: 5 with low-risk and 73 with high-risk polyps). Data were collected using an online CRF. Overall, 37/120 polyps (30.8%) were low risk and 83/120 (69.2%) were high risk. 42 out of 120 patients (35%) were enrolled in the "clinical follow-up" arm, while 78/120 (65%) entered the surgery arm. In 15 cases, patients were not enrolled in the correct arm, according to the criteria agreed upon before starting the study. There still is a high incidence (11.5%) of pathological mismatches. No clinical event was reported in 2.9 years of follow-up. In conclusion, some differences emerged in the management of patients with malignant polyps among participating centers (p < 0.001), mismatches can be explained by high surgical risk or patient's choice. Only in 5 cases (4.2%), did data analysis not allow to exactly determine the reason for a choice different from protocol criteria. The availability of new risk factors and the evidence of pathological mismatches confirmed the need for future studies on this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21647795     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-011-0081-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  10 in total

1.  European Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version (2003).

Authors:  P Boyle; P Autier; H Bartelink; J Baselga; P Boffetta; J Burn; H J G Burns; L Christensen; L Denis; M Dicato; V Diehl; R Doll; S Franceschi; C R Gillis; N Gray; L Griciute; A Hackshaw; M Kasler; M Kogevinas; S Kvinnsland; C La Vecchia; F Levi; J G McVie; P Maisonneuve; J M Martin-Moreno; J Newton Bishop; F Oleari; P Perrin; M Quinn; M Richards; U Ringborg; C Scully; E Siracka; H Storm; M Tubiana; T Tursz; U Veronesi; N Wald; W Weber; D G Zaridze; W Zatonski; H zur Hausen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S Kudo
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Histologic risk factors and clinical outcome in colorectal malignant polyp: a pooled-data analysis.

Authors:  Cesare Hassan; Angelo Zullo; Mauro Risio; Francesco P Rossini; Sergio Morini
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  Endoscopic management of polypoid early colon cancer.

Authors:  C B Williams; B P Saunders; I C Talbot
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Is endoscopic polypectomy an adequate therapy for malignant colorectal adenomas? Presentation of 114 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  U Seitz; S Bohnacker; S Seewald; F Thonke; B Brand; T Bräiutigam; N Soehendra
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Colon cancer screening update and management of the malignant polyp.

Authors:  James M Church
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

7.  Polyp surveillance.

Authors:  W Donald Buie; Anthony R MacLean
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

8.  Management of the malignant polyp.

Authors:  Marcela Ramirez; Steven Schierling; Harry T Papaconstantinou; J Scott Thomas
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

9.  Prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas arising in adenomas: implications for lesions removed by endoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  R C Haggitt; R E Glotzbach; E E Soffer; L D Wruble
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Reducing the incidence and mortality of colon cancer: mass screening and colonoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.806

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.