Literature DB >> 21647649

Pigeons discriminate between human feeders.

Ahmed Belguermi1, Dalila Bovet, Anouck Pascal, Anne-Caroline Prévot-Julliard, Michel Saint Jalme, Lauriane Rat-Fischer, Gérard Leboucher.   

Abstract

Considered as plague in many cities, pigeons in urban areas live close to human activities and exploit this proximity to find food which is often directly delivered by people. In this study, we explored the capacity of feral pigeons to take advantage of this human-based food resource and discriminate between friendly and hostile people. Our study was conducted in an urban park. Pigeons were fed by two experimenters of approximately the same age and skin colour but wearing coats of different colours. During the training sessions, the two human feeders displayed different attitudes: one of the feeders was neutral and the second was hostile and chased away the pigeons. During the two test phases subsequent to the training phase, both feeders became neutral. Two experiments were conducted, one with one male and one female feeder and the second with two female feeders. In both experiments, the pigeons learned to quickly (six to nine sessions) discriminate between the feeders and maintained this discrimination during the test phases. The pigeons avoided the hostile feeder even when the two feeders exchanged their coats, suggesting that they used stable individual characteristics to differentiate between the experimenter feeders. Thus, pigeons are able to learn quickly from their interactions with human feeders and use this knowledge to maximize the profitability of the urban environment. This study provides the first experimental evidence in feral pigeons for this level of human discrimination. © Springer-Verlag 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21647649     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-011-0420-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  7 in total

1.  Neural encoding of choice during a delayed response task in primate striatum and orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Howard C Cromwell; Leon Tremblay; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Fractionating choice: A study on reward discrimination, preference, and relative valuation in the rat (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Joshua M Ricker; Justin D Hatch; Daniel D Powers; Howard Casey Cromwell
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Familiarity with the experimenter influences the performance of Common ravens (Corvus corax) and Carrion crows (Corvus corone corone) in cognitive tasks.

Authors:  Lara Cibulski; Claudia A F Wascher; Brigitte M Weiss; Kurt Kotrschal
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Discrimination of human faces by archerfish (Toxotes chatareus).

Authors:  Cait Newport; Guy Wallis; Yarema Reshitnyk; Ulrike E Siebeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Predator or provider? How wild animals respond to mixed messages from humans.

Authors:  Madeleine Goumas; Neeltje J Boogert; Laura A Kelley; Thomas Holding
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  The ability of North Island Robins to discriminate between humans is related to their behavioural type.

Authors:  Craig Barnett; Matt Salter; Clément Chevallier; Nicola Robertson; Otis Berard; Kevin C Burns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Pigeons integrate past knowledge across sensory modalities.

Authors:  Claudia Stephan; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.844

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.