Literature DB >> 21647647

Species difference in the timing of gaze movement between chimpanzees and humans.

Fumihiro Kano1, Masaki Tomonaga.   

Abstract

How do humans and their closest relatives, chimpanzees, differ in their fundamental abilities for seeing the visual world? In this study, we directly compared the gaze movements of humans and the closest species, chimpanzees, using an eye-tracking system. During free viewing of a naturalistic scene, chimpanzees made more fixations per second (up to four) than did humans (up to three). This species difference was independent of the semantic variability of the presented scenes. The gap-overlap paradigm revealed that, rather than resulting from the sensitivity to the peripherally presented stimuli per se, the species difference reflected the particular strategy each species employed to solve the rivalry between central (fixated) and peripheral stimuli in their visual fields. Finally, when presented with a movie in which small images successively appeared/disappeared at random positions at the chosen presentation rate, chimpanzees tracked those images at the point of fixation for a longer time than did humans, outperforming humans in their speed of scanning. Our results suggest that chimpanzees and humans differ quantitatively in their visual strategies involving the timing of gaze movement. We discuss the functional reasons for each species' employing such specific strategies. © Springer-Verlag 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21647647     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-011-0422-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  13 in total

1.  Humans and chimpanzees attend differently to goal-directed actions.

Authors:  Masako Myowa-Yamakoshi; Céline Scola; Satoshi Hirata
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  The application of noninvasive, restraint-free eye-tracking methods for use with nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Lydia M Hopper; Roberto A Gulli; Lauren H Howard; Fumihiro Kano; Christopher Krupenye; Amy M Ryan; Annika Paukner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06

3.  Head-mounted eye tracking of a chimpanzee under naturalistic conditions.

Authors:  Fumihiro Kano; Masaki Tomonaga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  GraFIX: a semiautomatic approach for parsing low- and high-quality eye-tracking data.

Authors:  Irati R Saez de Urabain; Mark H Johnson; Tim J Smith
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-03

5.  Chimpanzee choice rates in competitive games match equilibrium game theory predictions.

Authors:  Christopher Flynn Martin; Rahul Bhui; Peter Bossaerts; Tetsuro Matsuzawa; Colin Camerer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Individual Differences in Infant Oculomotor Behavior During the Viewing of Complex Naturalistic Scenes.

Authors:  Sam V Wass; Tim J Smith
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2014-07

7.  Cultural and Species Differences in Gazing Patterns for Marked and Decorated Objects: A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Cordelia Mühlenbeck; Thomas Jacobsen; Carla Pritsch; Katja Liebal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-23

8.  Dog eye movements are slower than human eye movements.

Authors:  Soon Young Park; Catarina Espanca Bacelar; Kenneth Holmqvist
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 0.957

9.  Exploring the dog-human relationship by combining fMRI, eye-tracking and behavioural measures.

Authors:  Sabrina Karl; Magdalena Boch; Anna Zamansky; Dirk van der Linden; Isabella C Wagner; Christoph J Völter; Claus Lamm; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Humans but Not Chimpanzees Vary Face-Scanning Patterns Depending on Contexts during Action Observation.

Authors:  Masako Myowa-Yamakoshi; Chisato Yoshida; Satoshi Hirata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.