Literature DB >> 21647502

Exploring the dark side of MTT viability assay of cells cultured onto electrospun PLGA-based composite nanofibrous scaffolding materials.

Ruiling Qi1, Mingwu Shen, Xueyan Cao, Rui Guo, Xuejiao Tian, Jianyong Yu, Xiangyang Shi.   

Abstract

One major method used to evaluate the biocompatibility of porous tissue engineering scaffolding materials is MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. The MTT cell viability assay is based on the absorbance of the dissolved MTT formazan crystals formed in living cells, which is proportional to the number of viable cells. Due to the strong dye sorption capability of porous scaffolding materials, we propose that the cell viability determined from the MTT assay is likely to give a false negative result. In this study, we aim to explore the effect of the adsorption of MTT formazan on the accuracy of the viability assay of cells cultured onto porous electrospun poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanofibers, HNTs (halloysite nanotubes)/PLGA, and CNTs (multiwalled carbon nanotubes)/PLGA composite nanofibrous mats. The morphology of electrospun nanofibers and L929 mouse fibroblasts cultured onto the nanofibrous scaffolds were observed using scanning electron microscopy. The viability of cells proliferated for 3 days was evaluated through the MTT assay. In the meantime, the adsorption of MTT formazan onto the same electrospun nanofibers was evaluated and the standard concentration-absorbance curve was obtained in order to quantify the contribution of the adsorbed MTT formazan during the MTT cell viability assay. We show that the PLGA, and the HNTs- or CNTs-doped PLGA nanofibers display appreciable MTT formazan dye sorption, corresponding to 35.6-50.2% deviation from the real cell viability assay data. The better dye sorption capability of the nanofibers leads to further deviation from the real cell viability. Our study gives a general insight into accurate MTT cytotoxicity assessment of various porous tissue engineering scaffolding materials, and may be applicable to other colorimetric assays for analyzing the biological properties of porous scaffolding materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21647502     DOI: 10.1039/c0an01026j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Analyst        ISSN: 0003-2654            Impact factor:   4.616


  6 in total

1.  Nanofibrous materials affect the reaction of cytotoxicity assays.

Authors:  Rafał Podgórski; Michał Wojasiński; Tomasz Ciach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Characterization, Biocompatibility, and Optimization of Electrospun SF/PCL/CS Composite Nanofibers.

Authors:  Hua-Wei Chen; Min-Feng Lin
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 4.329

3.  A Promising Method for the Determination of Cell Viability: The Membrane Potential Cell Viability Assay.

Authors:  Eneko Madorran; Andraž Stožer; Zoran Arsov; Uroš Maver; Jan Rožanc
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 7.666

4.  Single-walled carbon nanotubes functionalized with sodium hyaluronate enhance bone mineralization.

Authors:  M A Sá; H J Ribeiro; T M Valverde; B R Sousa; P A Martins-Júnior; R M Mendes; L O Ladeira; R R Resende; G T Kitten; A J Ferreira
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 2.590

5.  Silica-Polymer Composites as the Novel Antibiotic Delivery Systems for Bone Tissue Infection.

Authors:  Adrianna Skwira; Adrian Szewczyk; Agnieszka Konopacka; Monika Górska; Dorota Majda; Rafał Sądej; Magdalena Prokopowicz
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 6.321

6.  Safety and efficacy of in vitro generated bone-like material for in vivo bone regeneration - a feasibility study.

Authors:  Nahum Rosenberg; Orit Rosenberg
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-01-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.