PURPOSE: This study provides a meta-analysis of the difference between children with primary or specific language impairment (LI) and their typically developing peers on tasks of sustained attention. The meta-analysis seeks to determine whether children with LI demonstrate subclinical deficits in sustained attention and, if so, under what conditions. METHOD: Articles that reported empirical data from the performance of children with LI, in comparison to typically developing peers, on a task assessing sustained attention were considered for inclusion. Twenty-eight effect sizes were included in the meta-analysis. Two moderator analyses addressed the effects of stimulus modality and attention-deficit/hypereactivity disorder exclusion. In addition, reaction time outcomes and the effects of task variables were summarized qualitatively. RESULTS: The meta-analysis supports the existence of sustained attention deficits in children with LI in both auditory and visual modalities, as demonstrated by reduced accuracy compared with typically developing peers. Larger effect sizes are found in tasks that use auditory-linguistic stimuli than in studies that use visual stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should consider the role that sustained attention weaknesses play in LI as well as the implications for clinical and research assessment tasks. Methodological recommendations are summarized.
PURPOSE: This study provides a meta-analysis of the difference between children with primary or specific language impairment (LI) and their typically developing peers on tasks of sustained attention. The meta-analysis seeks to determine whether children with LI demonstrate subclinical deficits in sustained attention and, if so, under what conditions. METHOD: Articles that reported empirical data from the performance of children with LI, in comparison to typically developing peers, on a task assessing sustained attention were considered for inclusion. Twenty-eight effect sizes were included in the meta-analysis. Two moderator analyses addressed the effects of stimulus modality and attention-deficit/hypereactivity disorder exclusion. In addition, reaction time outcomes and the effects of task variables were summarized qualitatively. RESULTS: The meta-analysis supports the existence of sustained attention deficits in children with LI in both auditory and visual modalities, as demonstrated by reduced accuracy compared with typically developing peers. Larger effect sizes are found in tasks that use auditory-linguistic stimuli than in studies that use visual stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should consider the role that sustained attention weaknesses play in LI as well as the implications for clinical and research assessment tasks. Methodological recommendations are summarized.
Authors: Carol A Miller; Laurence B Leonard; Robert V Kail; Xuyang Zhang; J Bruce Tomblin; David J Francis Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Ronald B Gillam; Diane Frome Loeb; Lavae M Hoffman; Thomas Bohman; Craig A Champlin; Linda Thibodeau; Judith Widen; Jayne Brandel; Sandy Friel-Patti Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: A Arboleda-Ramírez; J P Lopera-Vásquez; L Hincapié-Henao; M Giraldo-Prieto; D A Pineda; F Lopera; E Lopera-Echeverri Journal: Rev Neurol Date: 2007 May 16-31 Impact factor: 0.870
Authors: Barbara A Lewis; Elizabeth J Short; Sudha K Iyengar; H Gerry Taylor; Lisa Freebairn; Jessica Tag; Allison A Avrich; Catherine M Stein Journal: Top Lang Disord Date: 2012-09-01