Literature DB >> 21645976

Continued benefit to androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer patients treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy across multiple definitions of high-risk disease.

Matthew H Stenmark1, Kevin Blas, Schuyler Halverson, Howard M Sandler, Felix Y Feng, Daniel A Hamstra.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze prognostic factors in patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with dose-escalated external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and androgen deprivation (ADT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1998 and 2008 at the University of Michigan Medical Center, 718 men were consecutively treated with EBRT to at least 75 Gy. Seven definitions of high-risk prostate cancer, applying to 11-33% of patients, were evaluated. Biochemical failure (BF), salvage ADT use, metastatic progression, and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS: Each high-risk definition was associated with increased BF (hazard ratio [HR] 2.8-3.9, p < 0.0001), salvage ADT use (HR 3.9-6.3, p < 0.0001), metastasis (HR 3.7-6.6, p < 0.0001), and PCSM (HR 3.7-16.2, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, an increasing number of high-risk features predicted worse outcome. Adjuvant ADT yielded significant reductions in both metastases (HR 0.19-0.38, p < 0.001) and PCSM (HR 0.38-0.50, p < 0.05) for all high-risk definitions (with the exception of clinical Stage T3-4 disease) but improved BF only for those with elevated Gleason scores (p < 0.03, HR 0.25-0.48). When treated with ADT and dose-escalated EBRT, patients with Gleason scores 8 to 10, without other high-risk features, had 8-year freedom from BF of 74%, freedom from distant metastases of 93%, and cause-specific survival of 92%, with salvage ADT used in 16% of patients.
CONCLUSION: Adjuvant ADT results in a significant improvement in clinical progression and PCSM across multiple definitions of high-risk disease even with dose-escalated EBRT. There is a subset of patients, characterized by multiple high-risk features or the presence of Gleason Pattern 5, who remain at significant risk for metastasis and PCSM despite current treatment.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21645976     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.04.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

1.  [The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].

Authors:  G Kristiansen; L Egevad; M Amin; B Delahunt; J R Srigley; P A Humphrey; J I Epstein
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Characteristics of modern Gleason 9/10 prostate adenocarcinoma: a single tertiary centre experience within the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  F O'Kelly; S Elamin; A Cahill; P Aherne; J White; J Buckley; K N O'Regan; A Brady; D G Power; M F O'Brien; P Sweeney; N Mayer; P J Kelly
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Androgen deprivation therapy in the treatment of locally advanced, nonmetastatic prostate cancer: practical experience and a review of the clinical trial evidence.

Authors:  Fouad Aoun; Ali Bourgi; Elias Ayoub; Elie El Rassy; Roland van Velthoven; Alexandre Peltier
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-03-01

4.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in early assessment of tumour response to radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  L Liu; N Wu; H Ouyang; J-R Dai; W-H Wang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Current role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapy for high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tanya B Dorff; L Michael Glode
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.309

6.  The current role of androgen deprivation in patients undergoing dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Smith; Naveed H Akhtar; Scott T Tagawa
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2012-04-24

7.  Classifying high-risk versus very high-risk prostate cancer: is it relevant to outcomes of conformal radiotherapy and androgen deprivation?

Authors:  Akram Saad; Jeffrey Goldstein; Yaacov R Lawrence; Benjamin Spieler; Raya Leibowitz-Amit; Raanan Berger; Tima Davidson; Damien Urban; Lev Tsang; Dror Alezra; Ilana Weiss; Zvi Symon
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Dose escalation of external beam radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer-Impact of multiple high-risk factor.

Authors:  Rei Umezawa; Koji Inaba; Satoshi Nakamura; Akihisa Wakita; Hiroyuki Okamoto; Keisuke Tsuchida; Tairo Kashihara; Kazuma Kobayashi; Ken Harada; Kana Takahashi; Naoya Murakami; Yoshinori Ito; Hiroshi Igaki; Keiichi Jingu; Jun Itami
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2017-10-19

9.  Prognostic factors in Japanese men with high-Gleason metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuhisa Nishimoto; Kazutoshi Fujita; Yutaka Yamamoto; Mamoru Hashimoto; Shogo Adomi; Eri Banno; Yoshitaka Saito; Nobutaka Shimizu; Yasunori Mori; Takafumi Minami; Masahiro Nozawa; Kazuhiro Nose; Akihide Hirayama; Kazuhiro Yoshimura; Hirotsugu Uemura
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 0.496

Review 10.  Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: current state and prognostic implications.

Authors:  Jennifer Gordetsky; Jonathan Epstein
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.644

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.