Literature DB >> 21644501

Enhancing the accuracy of chemogenomic models with a three-dimensional binding site kernel.

Jamel Meslamani1, Didier Rognan.   

Abstract

Computational chemogenomic (or proteochemometric) methods predict target-ligand interactions by training machine learning algorithms on known experimental data in order to distinguish attributes of true from false target-ligand pairs. Many ligand and target descriptors can be used for training and predicting binary associations or even binding affinities. Several chemogenomic studies have not noticed any real benefit in using 3-D structural target descriptors with respect to simpler sequence-based or property-based information. To assess whether this observation results from inaccurate target description or from the fact that 3-D information is simply not required in chemogenomic modeling, we used a target kernel measuring the distance between target-ligand binding sites of known X-ray structures. When used in combination with a standard ligand kernel in a support vector machine (SVM) classifier, the 3-D target kernel significantly outperforms a sequence-based target kernel in discriminating 2882 target-ligand PDB complexes from 9128 false pairs, whatever the modeling procedure (local or global). The best SVM models could be successfully applied to predict, with very high recall (70%), precision (99%), and specificity (99%), target-ligand associations for an external set of 14,117 ligands and 531 targets. In most of the cases, pooling all data in a global model gave better statistics than just discretizing specific target-ligand subspaces in local models. The current study clearly demonstrates that chemogenomic models taking both ligand and target information outperform simpler ligand-based models. It also permits one to design good modeling practices in predicting target-ligand pairing for a large array of targets: (i) ligand-based models are precise enough if sufficient ligand information (>40-50 diverse ligands) is known; (ii) if not, structure-based chemogenomic models (associating a ligand kernel to a structure-based target kernel) are recommended for proteins of known holostructures; (iii) sequence-based chemogenomic models (associating a ligand kernel to a sequence-based target kernel) can still be used with a very good accuracy for the remaining targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21644501     DOI: 10.1021/ci200166t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of ultra-fast 2D and 3D ligand and target descriptors for side effect prediction and network analysis in polypharmacology.

Authors:  Alvaro Cortés-Cabrera; Garrett M Morris; Paul W Finn; Antonio Morreale; Federico Gago
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Large-Scale Prediction of Drug-Target Interaction: a Data-Centric Review.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Ming Hao; Takako Takeda; Stephen H Bryant; Yanli Wang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Open-source chemogenomic data-driven algorithms for predicting drug-target interactions.

Authors:  Ming Hao; Stephen H Bryant; Yanli Wang
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Which compound to select in lead optimization? Prospectively validated proteochemometric models guide preclinical development.

Authors:  Gerard J P van Westen; Jörg K Wegner; Peggy Geluykens; Leen Kwanten; Inge Vereycken; Anik Peeters; Adriaan P Ijzerman; Herman W T van Vlijmen; Andreas Bender
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  STITCH 3: zooming in on protein-chemical interactions.

Authors:  Michael Kuhn; Damian Szklarczyk; Andrea Franceschini; Christian von Mering; Lars Juhl Jensen; Peer Bork
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Drug Target Identification with Machine Learning: How to Choose Negative Examples.

Authors:  Matthieu Najm; Chloé-Agathe Azencott; Benoit Playe; Véronique Stoven
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Insights into an original pocket-ligand pair classification: a promising tool for ligand profile prediction.

Authors:  Stéphanie Pérot; Leslie Regad; Christelle Reynès; Olivier Spérandio; Maria A Miteva; Bruno O Villoutreix; Anne-Claude Camproux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.