Literature DB >> 21644015

Dispersal constraints for stream invertebrates: setting realistic timescales for biodiversity restoration.

Stephanie M Parkyn1, Brian J Smith.   

Abstract

Biodiversity goals are becoming increasingly important in stream restoration. Typical models of stream restoration are based on the assumption that if habitat is restored then species will return and ecological processes will re-establish. However, a range of constraints at different scales can affect restoration success. Much of the research in stream restoration ecology has focused on habitat constraints, namely the in-stream and riparian conditions required to restore biota. Dispersal constraints are also integral to determining the timescales, trajectory and potential endpoints of a restored ecosystem. Dispersal is both a means of organism recolonization of restored sites and a vital ecological process that maintains viable populations. We review knowledge of dispersal pathways and explore the factors influencing stream invertebrate dispersal. From empirical and modeling studies of restoration in warm-temperate zones of New Zealand, we make predictions about the timescales of stream ecological restoration under differing levels of dispersal constraints. This process of constraints identification and timescale prediction is proposed as a practical step for resource managers to prioritize and appropriately monitor restoration sites and highlights that in some instances, natural recolonization and achievement of biodiversity goals may not occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21644015     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9694-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  10 in total

1.  Forecasting rehabilitation outcomes for degraded New Zealand pastoral streams.

Authors:  K J Collier; J C Rutherford; J M Quinn; R J Davies-Colley
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.915

2.  Dispersal of adult female Culex annulirostris in Griffith, New South Wales, Australia: a further study.

Authors:  J H Bryan; M S O'Donnell; G Berry; T Carvan
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 0.917

3.  Managing plantation forests to provide short- to long-term supplies of wood to streams: a simulation study using New Zealand's pine plantations.

Authors:  Mark A Meleason; Graeme M J Hall
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Selective oviposition of the mayfly Baetis bicaudatus.

Authors:  Andrea C Encalada; Barbara L Peckarsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Does dispersal control population densities in advection-dominated systems? A fresh look at critical assumptions and a direct test.

Authors:  Barbara J Downes; Jill Lancaster
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past.

Authors:  J S Harding; E F Benfield; P V Bolstad; G S Helfman; E B Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The distances travelled by drifting invertebrates in a Lake District stream.

Authors:  J M Elliott
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The colonization cycle of freshwater insects.

Authors:  K Müller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Gene flow, dispersal, and nested clade analysis among populations of the stonefly Peltoperla tarteri in the southern Appalachians.

Authors:  A S Schultheis; L A Weigt; A C Hendricks
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Why do mayflies lay their eggs en masse on dry asphalt roads? Water-imitating polarized light reflected from asphalt attracts Ephemeroptera.

Authors:  G Kriska; G Horváth; S Andrikovics
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.312

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Consideration of spatial and temporal scales in stream restorations and biotic monitoring to assess restoration outcomes: A literature review, Part 2.

Authors:  Michael B Griffith; Michael G McManus
Journal:  River Res Appl       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 2.443

2.  Long-term impacts on macroinvertebrates downstream of reclaimed mountaintop mining valley fills in Central Appalachia.

Authors:  Gregory J Pond; Margaret E Passmore; Nancy D Pointon; John K Felbinger; Craig A Walker; Kelly J G Krock; Jennifer B Fulton; Whitney L Nash
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  The coastal plain headwater stream restoration (CP-HStR) index: a macroinvertebrate index for assessing the biological effectiveness of stream restoration in the Georgia coastal plain, USA.

Authors:  D Eric Somerville; Gregory J Pond
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Connectivity and seasonality cause rapid taxonomic and functional trait succession within an invertebrate community after stream restoration.

Authors:  Judith J Westveer; Harm G van der Geest; E Emiel van Loon; Piet F M Verdonschot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Estimates of resource transfer via winged adult insects from the hyporheic zone in a gravel-bed river.

Authors:  Mirza A T M Tanvir Rahman; Junjiro N Negishi; Takumi Akasaka; Futoshi Nakamura
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 6.  Rewilding with invertebrates and microbes to restore ecosystems: Present trends and future directions.

Authors:  Peter Contos; Jennifer L Wood; Nicholas P Murphy; Heloise Gibb
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.