Literature DB >> 21643975

Partial nitrification and nutrient removal in intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactors treating separated digestate liquid after anaerobic digestion of pig manure.

Mingchuan Zhang1, Peadar G Lawlor, Guangxue Wu, Brendan Lynch, Xinmin Zhan.   

Abstract

The performance of an intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactor (IASBR) technology was investigated in achieving partial nitrification, organic matter removal and nitrogen removal from separated digestate liquid after anaerobic digestion of pig manure. The wastewater had chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentrations of 11,540 ± 860 mg/L, 5-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD(5)) concentrations of 2,900 ± 200 mg/L and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations of 4,041 ± 59 mg/L, with low COD:N ratios (2.9) and BOD(5):COD ratios (0.25). Synthetic wastewater, simulating the separated digestate liquid with similar COD and nitrogen concentrations but BOD(5) of 11,500 ± 100 mg/L, was also treated using the IASBR technology. At a mean organic loading rate of 1.15 kg COD/(m(3) d) and a nitrogen loading rate of 0.38 kg N/(m(3) d), the COD removal efficiency was 89.8% in the IASBR (IASBR-1) treating digestate liquid and 99% in the IASBR (IASBR-2) treating synthetic wastewater. The IASBR-1 effluent COD was mainly due to inert organic matter and can be further reduced to less than 40 mg/L through coagulation. The partial nitrification efficiency of 71-79% was achieved in the two IASBRs and one cause for the stable long-term partial nitrification was the intermittent aeration strategy. Nitrogen removal efficiencies were 76.5 and 97% in IASBR-1 and IASBR-2, respectively. The high nitrogen removal efficiencies show that the IASBR technology is a promising technology for nitrogen removal from low COD:N ratio wastewaters. The nitrogen balance analysis shows that 59.4 and 74.3% of nitrogen removed was via heterotrophic denitrification in the non-aeration periods in IASBR-1 and IASBR-2, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21643975     DOI: 10.1007/s00449-011-0556-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng        ISSN: 1615-7591            Impact factor:   3.210


  6 in total

1.  Treatment of Ammonium-Rich Digestate from Methane Fermentation Using Aerobic Granular Sludge.

Authors:  Piotr Świątczak; Agnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 2.  A Glimpse of the World of Volatile Fatty Acids Production and Application: A review.

Authors:  Swarnima Agnihotri; Dong-Min Yin; Amir Mahboubi; Tugba Sapmaz; Sunita Varjani; Wei Qiao; Derya Y Koseoglu-Imer; Mohammad J Taherzadeh
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.269

3.  Microalgae population dynamics in photobioreactors with secondary sewage effluent as culture medium.

Authors:  Adriano E Marchello; Ana T Lombardi; Maria José Dellamano-Oliveira; Clovis W O de Souza
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.476

4.  Characteristics of Biological Nitrogen Removal in a Multiple Anoxic and Aerobic Biological Nutrient Removal Process.

Authors:  Huoqing Wang; Yuntao Guan; Li Li; Guangxue Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Effect of inoculated and uninoculated aeration pretreatment on nutrients and phytotoxicity of anaerobic digestion effluent.

Authors:  Bangxi Zhang; Yun Li; Shuyan Li; Guoxue Li; Qiaoping Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Removal of Nutrients From Anaerobically Digested Swine Wastewater Using an Intermittent Cycle Extended Aeration System.

Authors:  Nguyen Hong Dan; Eldon R Rene; Tran Le Luu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.