Literature DB >> 21643814

Do inexperienced bumblebee foragers use scent marks as social information?

Ellouise Leadbeater1, Lars Chittka.   

Abstract

Bumblebees (Bombus spp.) foraging in the field typically reject flowers where they detect the olfactory footprints of previous visitors and hence avoid recently emptied inflorescences. A growing number of studies have begun to illustrate that associative learning shapes the development of this process, in both bumblebees and other bee species. This raises the question of what the default response to such marks is, but little is known about how inexperienced foragers use social information. Here, we offered flower-naive bees a choice between scent-marked flowers and unmarked alternatives and found that individuals neither avoided nor preferred marked flowers. Our findings provide no support for 'hard-wired' responses to scent marks in bumblebees and highlight the importance of associative learning in shaping social information use to match local circumstances. © Springer-Verlag 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21643814     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-011-0423-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  9 in total

1.  Stingless bees (Melipona scutellaris) learn to associate footprint cues at food sources with a specific reward context.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Roselino; André Vieira Rodrigues; Michael Hrncir
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  A social insect perspective on the evolution of social learning mechanisms.

Authors:  Ellouise Leadbeater; Erika H Dawson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Stingless Bee Melipona solani Deposits a Signature Mixture and Methyl Oleate to Mark Valuable Food Sources.

Authors:  David Alavez-Rosas; Edi A Malo; Miguel A Guzmán; Daniel Sánchez-Guillén; Rogel Villanueva-Gutiérrez; Leopoldo Cruz-López
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Monitoring Flower Visitation Networks and Interactions between Pairs of Bumble Bees in a Large Outdoor Flight Cage.

Authors:  Mathieu Lihoreau; Lars Chittka; Nigel E Raine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Bumblebees can discriminate between scent-marks deposited by conspecifics.

Authors:  Richard F Pearce; Luca Giuggioli; Sean A Rands
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Cumulative culture can emerge from collective intelligence in animal groups.

Authors:  Takao Sasaki; Dora Biro
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Role of conspecifics and personal experience on behavioral avoidance of contaminated flowers by bumblebees.

Authors:  Bertrand Fouks; Emily G Robb; H Michael G Lattorff
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  Observational conditioning in flower choice copying by bumblebees (Bombus terrestris): influence of observer distance and demonstrator movement.

Authors:  Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Lars Chittka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Inter-individual variability in the foraging behaviour of traplining bumblebees.

Authors:  Simon Klein; Cristian Pasquaretta; Andrew B Barron; Jean-Marc Devaud; Mathieu Lihoreau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.