BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is an increasing challenge to health services globally. Although new drugs are in development, current guidelines still recommend prolonged use of injectable antimicrobials (usually amikacin, kanamycin or capreomycin). The evidence base to inform treatment and monitoring strategies is very limited. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients initiating injectable antimicrobials for MDR-TB treatment in five UK centres between January 2004 and December 2009. (i) Current treatment and monitoring strategies were reviewed. (ii) The incidence of ototoxicity (defined both clinically and on audiological testing) and factors associated with ototoxicity were investigated using logistic regression. RESULTS: (i) The choice of injectable antimicrobial varied. Of 50 MDR-TB patients, 29/50 (58%) received amikacin, 11/50 (22%) received capreomycin and 10/50 (20%) received streptomycin or a combination; reflecting a difference in policy between centres. Only 21/50 (42%) patients received baseline screening by audiogram within 2 weeks of starting treatment and 16/50 (32%) then had monthly audiograms, with the majority screened more infrequently and 12/50 (24%) receiving no screening. (ii) Of the 50 patients, 14 (28%) experienced ototoxicity, with 9/50 (18%) left with long-term hearing loss. Increased age (P = 0.02), use of amikacin (P = 0.02) and decreased renal function (P = 0.01) were significantly associated with ototoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: There is local variation in both the choice of injectable agent and in ototoxicity screening practices. Long-term morbidity from injectable treatment is significant even in this well-resourced setting, and the data suggest capreomycin might be associated with less ototoxicity when compared with amikacin. There is a need for more high-quality clinical data to inform future guidelines for treatment and monitoring.
BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is an increasing challenge to health services globally. Although new drugs are in development, current guidelines still recommend prolonged use of injectable antimicrobials (usually amikacin, kanamycin or capreomycin). The evidence base to inform treatment and monitoring strategies is very limited. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients initiating injectable antimicrobials for MDR-TB treatment in five UK centres between January 2004 and December 2009. (i) Current treatment and monitoring strategies were reviewed. (ii) The incidence of ototoxicity (defined both clinically and on audiological testing) and factors associated with ototoxicity were investigated using logistic regression. RESULTS: (i) The choice of injectable antimicrobial varied. Of 50 MDR-TB patients, 29/50 (58%) received amikacin, 11/50 (22%) received capreomycin and 10/50 (20%) received streptomycin or a combination; reflecting a difference in policy between centres. Only 21/50 (42%) patients received baseline screening by audiogram within 2 weeks of starting treatment and 16/50 (32%) then had monthly audiograms, with the majority screened more infrequently and 12/50 (24%) receiving no screening. (ii) Of the 50 patients, 14 (28%) experienced ototoxicity, with 9/50 (18%) left with long-term hearing loss. Increased age (P = 0.02), use of amikacin (P = 0.02) and decreased renal function (P = 0.01) were significantly associated with ototoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: There is local variation in both the choice of injectable agent and in ototoxicity screening practices. Long-term morbidity from injectable treatment is significant even in this well-resourced setting, and the data suggest capreomycin might be associated with less ototoxicity when compared with amikacin. There is a need for more high-quality clinical data to inform future guidelines for treatment and monitoring.
Authors: Grania Brigden; Bern-Thomas Nyang'wa; Philipp du Cros; Francis Varaine; Jennifer Hughes; Michael Rich; C Robert Horsburgh; Carole D Mitnick; Eric Nuermberger; Helen McIlleron; Patrick P J Phillips; Manica Balasegaram Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: M Buziashvili; V Mirtskhulava; M Kipiani; H M Blumberg; D Baliashvili; M J Magee; J J Furin; N Tukvadze; R R Kempker Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Amber Arnold; Graham S Cooke; Onn Min Kon; Martin Dedicoat; Marc Lipman; Angela Loyse; Irina Chis Ster; Thomas S Harrison Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Payam Nahid; Sundari R Mase; Giovanni Battista Migliori; Giovanni Sotgiu; Graham H Bothamley; Jan L Brozek; Adithya Cattamanchi; J Peter Cegielski; Lisa Chen; Charles L Daley; Tracy L Dalton; Raquel Duarte; Federica Fregonese; C Robert Horsburgh; Faiz Ahmad Khan; Fayez Kheir; Zhiyi Lan; Alfred Lardizabal; Michael Lauzardo; Joan M Mangan; Suzanne M Marks; Lindsay McKenna; Dick Menzies; Carole D Mitnick; Diana M Nilsen; Farah Parvez; Charles A Peloquin; Ann Raftery; H Simon Schaaf; Neha S Shah; Jeffrey R Starke; John W Wilson; Jonathan M Wortham; Terence Chorba; Barbara Seaworth Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Martin Meyer; Pietro Freihofer; Michael Scherman; Joanne Teague; Anne Lenaerts; Erik C Böttger Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-08-18 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: N Alsaad; J A Dijkstra; O W Akkerman; W C M de Lange; D van Soolingen; J G W Kosterink; T S van der Werf; J W C Alffenaar Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 5.191