Xin Ye1, Marcia Rupnow2, Philippe Bastide3, Antoine Lafuma4, Liza Ovington2, William R Jarvis5. 1. Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ. Electronic address: sye2@ITS.JNJ.com. 2. Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ. 3. Ethicon, Inc, Auneau, France. 4. Cemka Eval Outcomes Research and Epidemiology, Bourg la Reine, France. 5. Jason and Jarvis Associates, Hilton Head Island, SC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The economic impact of adding chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-impregnated sponge dressing to standard care (ie, chg-impregnated sponge dressing + skin preparation and transparent film dressing vs skin preparation and transparent film dressing) for the prevention of central-line infections was evaluated. METHODS: Clinical and economic data were obtained from peer-reviewed published studies to populate the decision model. The efficacy of reducing catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) incidence with CHG-impregnated sponge dressing came from 2 recent randomized controlled trials. One-way and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed on key clinical and economic parameters. RESULTS: Based on model calculations, a hypothetical 400-bed hospital inserting 3,078 central venous catheters (CVCs) per year is expected to avoid an average of 35 CR-BSIs, 145 local infections, and 281 intensive care unit days annually with the systematic use of CHG-impregnated sponge dressing. Potential hospital net cost savings (mainly because of reduced CR-BSIs with use of the dressing) would be $895,000 annually. Results were robust across a range of values in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: CHG-impregnated sponge dressing is a cost-effective CR-BSI prevention treatment option for patients requiring CVCs. The importance of these results should be considered in the context of federal government and insurance company policies that no longer permit enhanced reimbursement for CR-BSI.
BACKGROUND: The economic impact of adding chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-impregnated sponge dressing to standard care (ie, chg-impregnated sponge dressing + skin preparation and transparent film dressing vs skin preparation and transparent film dressing) for the prevention of central-line infections was evaluated. METHODS: Clinical and economic data were obtained from peer-reviewed published studies to populate the decision model. The efficacy of reducing catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) incidence with CHG-impregnated sponge dressing came from 2 recent randomized controlled trials. One-way and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed on key clinical and economic parameters. RESULTS: Based on model calculations, a hypothetical 400-bed hospital inserting 3,078 central venous catheters (CVCs) per year is expected to avoid an average of 35 CR-BSIs, 145 local infections, and 281 intensive care unit days annually with the systematic use of CHG-impregnated sponge dressing. Potential hospital net cost savings (mainly because of reduced CR-BSIs with use of the dressing) would be $895,000 annually. Results were robust across a range of values in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION:CHG-impregnated sponge dressing is a cost-effective CR-BSI prevention treatment option for patients requiring CVCs. The importance of these results should be considered in the context of federal government and insurance company policies that no longer permit enhanced reimbursement for CR-BSI.
Authors: Nasia Safdar; John C O'Horo; Aiman Ghufran; Allison Bearden; Maria Eugenia Didier; Dan Chateau; Dennis G Maki Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Kristopher M Schroeder; Robert A Jacobs; Christopher Guite; Kyle Gassner; Brooke Anderson; Melanie J Donnelly Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 5.063
Authors: Teryl K Nuckols; Emmett Keeler; Sally C Morton; Laura Anderson; Brian Doyle; Marika Booth; Roberta Shanman; Jonathan Grein; Paul Shekelle Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Praveen Thokala; Martin Arrowsmith; Edith Poku; Marissa Martyn-St James; Jeff Anderson; Steve Foster; Tom Elliott; Tony Whitehouse Journal: J Infect Prev Date: 2016-07-13
Authors: Nai Ming Lai; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Nai An Lai; Elizabeth O'Riordan; Wilson Shu Cheng Pau; Sanjay Saint Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-03-16
Authors: Anne Wibaux; Priyaleela Thota; Jozef Mastej; Daniel L Prince; Neal Carty; Peter Johnson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michelle Jenks; Joyce Craig; William Green; Neil Hewitt; Mick Arber; Andrew Sims Journal: Appl Health Econ Health Policy Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 2.561