Literature DB >> 21641681

Economic impact of use of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge dressing for prevention of central line-associated infections in the United States.

Xin Ye1, Marcia Rupnow2, Philippe Bastide3, Antoine Lafuma4, Liza Ovington2, William R Jarvis5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The economic impact of adding chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-impregnated sponge dressing to standard care (ie, chg-impregnated sponge dressing + skin preparation and transparent film dressing vs skin preparation and transparent film dressing) for the prevention of central-line infections was evaluated.
METHODS: Clinical and economic data were obtained from peer-reviewed published studies to populate the decision model. The efficacy of reducing catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) incidence with CHG-impregnated sponge dressing came from 2 recent randomized controlled trials. One-way and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed on key clinical and economic parameters.
RESULTS: Based on model calculations, a hypothetical 400-bed hospital inserting 3,078 central venous catheters (CVCs) per year is expected to avoid an average of 35 CR-BSIs, 145 local infections, and 281 intensive care unit days annually with the systematic use of CHG-impregnated sponge dressing. Potential hospital net cost savings (mainly because of reduced CR-BSIs with use of the dressing) would be $895,000 annually. Results were robust across a range of values in sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION: CHG-impregnated sponge dressing is a cost-effective CR-BSI prevention treatment option for patients requiring CVCs. The importance of these results should be considered in the context of federal government and insurance company policies that no longer permit enhanced reimbursement for CR-BSI.
Copyright © 2011 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21641681     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  11 in total

1.  Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing for prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis*.

Authors:  Nasia Safdar; John C O'Horo; Aiman Ghufran; Allison Bearden; Maria Eugenia Didier; Dan Chateau; Dennis G Maki
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Use of a chlorhexidine-impregnated patch does not decrease the incidence of bacterial colonization of femoral nerve catheters: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Kristopher M Schroeder; Robert A Jacobs; Christopher Guite; Kyle Gassner; Brooke Anderson; Melanie J Donnelly
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 3.  Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement Interventions for Bloodstream Infections Related to Central Catheters: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Teryl K Nuckols; Emmett Keeler; Sally C Morton; Laura Anderson; Brian Doyle; Marika Booth; Roberta Shanman; Jonathan Grein; Paul Shekelle
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Cutaneous Microbiome Profiles Following Chlorhexidine Treatment in a 72-Hour Daily Follow-Up Paired Design: a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jean-Luc C Mougeot; Micaela F Beckman; Farah Bahrani Mougeot; James M Horton
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-06-21

5.  Economic impact of Tegaderm chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) dressing in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Praveen Thokala; Martin Arrowsmith; Edith Poku; Marissa Martyn-St James; Jeff Anderson; Steve Foster; Tom Elliott; Tony Whitehouse
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2016-07-13

6.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Transparent Antimicrobial Dressing for Managing Central Venous and Arterial Catheters in Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Franck Maunoury; Anastasiia Motrunich; Maria Palka-Santini; Stéphanie F Bernatchez; Stéphane Ruckly; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol solution in the prevention of intravascular-catheter-related bloodstream infections in France.

Authors:  Franck Maunoury; Christian Farinetto; Stéphane Ruckly; Jeremy Guenezan; Jean-Christophe Lucet; Alain Lepape; Julien Pascal; Bertrand Souweine; Olivier Mimoz; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Catheter impregnation, coating or bonding for reducing central venous catheter-related infections in adults.

Authors:  Nai Ming Lai; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Nai An Lai; Elizabeth O'Riordan; Wilson Shu Cheng Pau; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-16

9.  Antimicrobial Activity of a Novel Vascular Access Film Dressing Containing Chlorhexidine Gluconate.

Authors:  Anne Wibaux; Priyaleela Thota; Jozef Mastej; Daniel L Prince; Neal Carty; Peter Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Tegaderm CHG IV Securement Dressing for Central Venous and Arterial Catheter Insertion Sites: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.

Authors:  Michelle Jenks; Joyce Craig; William Green; Neil Hewitt; Mick Arber; Andrew Sims
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.