Literature DB >> 21641285

Social inequality and the biological standard of living: an anthropometric analysis of Swiss conscription data, 1875-1950.

Tobias Schoch1, Kaspar Staub, Christian Pfister.   

Abstract

We analyze the first representative series of individual measurements of the height of Swiss conscripts for the years 1875-1950. We find that average height followed a general upward time trend, but the economic downturn in the 1880s slowed down the increase in rural average-heights while the economic crisis subsequent to World War I had only a minor effect. Moreover, social-class affiliation was the most important determinant of differences in the biological standard of living, with class and regional disparities remaining constant, for the most part, during the observation period. Lower-class individuals' ability to overcome economic stress was limited, with the result that their biological standard of living, as reflected in the cyclicality of deviations from average height, was likely to be affected by cycles in economic activity.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21641285     DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2011.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Econ Hum Biol        ISSN: 1570-677X            Impact factor:   2.184


  6 in total

1.  Pubertal height gain is inversely related to peak BMI in childhood.

Authors:  Anton Holmgren; Aimon Niklasson; Andreas F M Nierop; Lars Gelander; A Stefan Aronson; Agneta Sjöberg; Lauren Lissner; Kerstin Albertsson-Wikland
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Life-history tradeoffs in a historical population (1896-1939) undergoing rapid fertility decline: Costs of reproduction?

Authors:  Adrian V Jaeggi; Jordan S Martin; Joël Floris; Nicole Bender; Martin Haeusler; Rebecca Sear; Kaspar Staub
Journal:  Evol Hum Sci       Date:  2022-02-21

3.  Height of Male Prisoners in Santiago de Chile during the Nitrate Era: The Penalty of being Unskilled, Illiterate, Illegitimate and Mapuche.

Authors:  Manuel Llorca-Jaña; Javier Rivas; Damian Clarke; Diego Barría Traverso
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Rural Height Penalty or Socioeconomic Penalization? The Nutritional Inequality in Backward Spain.

Authors:  Antonio M Linares-Luján; Francisco M Parejo-Moruno
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Biological Well-Being and Inequality in Canary Islands: Lanzarote (Cohorts 1886-1982).

Authors:  Begoña Candela-Martínez; José M Martínez-Carrión; Cándido Román-Cervantes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Height and health in late eighteenth-century England.

Authors:  Hannaliis Jaadla; Leigh Shaw-Taylor; Romola Davenport
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2020-09-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.