Literature DB >> 21641102

Cesarean delivery for first pregnancy and neonatal morbidity and mortality in second pregnancy.

Xin Huang1, Jun Lei, Hongzhuan Tan, Mark Walker, Jia Zhou, Shi Wu Wen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine impact of cesarean delivery in first pregnancy on neonatal mortality and morbidity in second pregnancy. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using 1995-2002 US birth registration data. Neonatal mortality and morbidity in second pregnancy of cesarean deliveries in the first pregnancy were compared with vaginal deliveries in the first pregnancy.
RESULTS: A total of 9,643,175 singleton second births were eligible in the analysis after excluding those with unknown delivery method (1,801,339 with a previous cesarean delivery and 7,841,836 with a previous vaginal delivery). Compared with vaginal delivery group, infants born to mothers with a previous cesarean delivery had increased risks of assisted ventilation (OR=1.47, 95% CI 1.46, 1.49), low Apgar's score (OR=1.14, 95% CI 1.12, 1.17), seizure (OR=1.36, 95% CI 1.27, 1.45), fetal distress (OR=1.46, 95% CI 1.44, 1.47), and asphyxia-related neonatal death (OR=1.40, 95% CI 1.29, 1.52). The association between mode of delivery in first pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in second pregnancy remained the same after excluding women with chronic health problems or adverse birth history and adjusting for potential confounding factors. CONCLUSION(S): Cesarean delivery in first pregnancy is associated with increased risks of neonatal morbidity and mortality in second pregnancy.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21641102     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  8 in total

1.  Determinants and trends in health facility-based deliveries and caesarean sections among married adolescent girls in Bangladesh.

Authors:  A S M Shahabuddin; Thérèse Delvaux; Bettina Utz; Azucena Bardají; Vincent De Brouwere
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Influencing factors in choosing delivery method: Iranian primiparous women's perspective.

Authors:  Ahmad Moosavi; Sepideh Gareh Sheikhlou; Sara Gareh Sheikhlou; Kolsum Abdolahi; Leila Yaminifar; Maryam Maktabi
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2017-04-25

3.  Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oonagh E Keag; Jane E Norman; Sarah J Stock
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Mode of delivery and preterm birth in subsequent births: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yinghui Zhang; Jie Zhou; Yubo Ma; Li Liu; Qing Xia; Dazhi Fan; Wen Ai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Maternal and fetal risks of planned vaginal breech delivery vs planned caesarean section for term breech birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francisco J Fernández-Carrasco; Delia Cristóbal-Cañadas; Juan Gómez-Salgado; Juana M Vázquez-Lara; Luciano Rodríguez-Díaz; Tesifón Parrón-Carreño
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 7.664

6.  Is a history of cesarean section a risk factor for abnormal uterine bleeding in patients with uterine leiomyoma?

Authors:  Tugba Kinay; Zehra O Basarir; Serap F Tuncer; Funda Akpinar; Fulya Kayikcioglu; Sevgi Koc; Jale Karakaya
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Jianfeng Ye; Anne-Beth Moller; Jun Zhang; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Maria Regina Torloni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Caesarean section rates analysed using Robson's 10-Group Classification System: a cross-sectional study at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Abdella Amano Abdo; Sven Gudmund Hinderaker; Achamyelesh Gebretsadik Tekle; Bernt Lindtjørn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.