Literature DB >> 21640953

The diversity of the ecosystem services concept and its implications for their assessment and management.

Pénélope Lamarque1, Fabien Quétier, Sandra Lavorel.   

Abstract

The ecosystem services concept is used in different scientific disciplines and is spreading into policy and business circles to draw attention to the benefits that people receive from biodiversity and ecosystems. However, the concept remains multiform and is used interchangeably with a range of other terms such as ecological, landscape or environmental services. We argue that lexical differences, in fact, result from different understandings of the concept, which could slow its use in nature conservation or sustainable resource use. An application to semi-natural grasslands shows that such differences could lead to very different assessments, of quality, quantity and location of ecosystem services. We argue that a compromise must be found between a broad and simple definition, which is useful for communicating the concept and large-scale policies, and a more refined definition for research and implementation goals such as environmental management and national and international assessments and accounting.
Copyright © 2010 Académie des sciences. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21640953     DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2010.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  C R Biol        ISSN: 1631-0691            Impact factor:   1.583


  8 in total

1.  Setting the bar: Standards for ecosystem services.

Authors:  Stephen Polasky; Heather Tallis; Belinda Reyers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Plant trait-based models identify direct and indirect effects of climate change on bundles of grassland ecosystem services.

Authors:  Pénélope Lamarque; Sandra Lavorel; Maud Mouchet; Fabien Quétier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences.

Authors:  Berta Martín-López; Irene Iniesta-Arandia; Marina García-Llorente; Ignacio Palomo; Izaskun Casado-Arzuaga; David García Del Amo; Erik Gómez-Baggethun; Elisa Oteros-Rozas; Igone Palacios-Agundez; Bárbara Willaarts; José A González; Fernando Santos-Martín; Miren Onaindia; Cesar López-Santiago; Carlos Montes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Impact of droughts on water provision in managed alpine grasslands in two climatically different regions of the Alps.

Authors:  Georg Leitinger; Romed Ruggenthaler; Albin Hammerle; Sandra Lavorel; Uta Schirpke; Jean-Christophe Clement; Pénélope Lamarque; Nikolaus Obojes; Ulrike Tappeiner
Journal:  Ecohydrology       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.843

5.  A social-ecological analysis of ecosystem services in two different farming systems.

Authors:  Erik Andersson; Björn Nykvist; Rebecka Malinga; Fernando Jaramillo; Regina Lindborg
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.129

6.  How ecosystem services knowledge and values influence farmers' decision-making.

Authors:  Pénélope Lamarque; Patrick Meyfroidt; Baptiste Nettier; Sandra Lavorel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Participative Spatial Scenario Analysis for Alpine Ecosystems.

Authors:  Marina Kohler; Rike Stotten; Melanie Steinbacher; Georg Leitinger; Erich Tasser; Uta Schirpke; Ulrike Tappeiner; Markus Schermer
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Plant functional assemblages as indicators of the resilience of grassland ecosystem service provision.

Authors:  Marina Kohler; Caroline Devaux; Karl Grigulis; Georg Leitinger; Sandra Lavorel; Ulrike Tappeiner
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.958

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.