Literature DB >> 21640935

Contemporary outcomes of percutaneous intervention in chronic total coronary occlusions due to in-stent restenosis.

Abdul-Rahman R Abdel-Karim1, William B Lombardi2, Subhash Banerjee1, Emmanouil S Brilakis3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the treatment of chronic total occlusions (CTO) due to in-stent restenosis (ISR).
METHODS: We reviewed the procedural techniques and outcomes of 21 consecutive interventions in CTOs due to ISR.
RESULTS: Mean age was 60±8 years, and all patients were men. The target lesion was located in the right coronary artery in 38%, left anterior descending or diagonal in 48%, or circumflex/obtuse marginal in 14%. One CTO lesion was treated in each patient. Two patients (10%) had prior unsuccessful attempt for CTO intervention and 14% had prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The average CTO age was 6.3±4.6 years. The overall ISR CTO procedural success rate was 71%. Procedural failure was due to inability to cross the CTO lesion in all unsuccessful cases. Failure to cross in CTOs located in the left anterior descending artery was due to the presence of a large side branch proximal to the CTO, whereas in the right coronary artery it was due to tortuosity. Retrograde interventions were attempted in four patients and were successful in one.
CONCLUSION: Success rates for ISR CTO interventions remain relatively low due to failure to cross the lesion. Several factors, such as long occlusion time, tortuosity, and presence of a large side branch proximal to the CTO may be associated with ISR CTO crossing failure. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21640935     DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2010.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med        ISSN: 1878-0938


  5 in total

1.  The efficacy of "hybrid" percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic total occlusions caused by in-stent restenosis: insights from a US multicenter registry.

Authors:  Georgios Christopoulos; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Khaldoon Alaswad; William L Lombardi; J Aaron Grantham; Bavana V Rangan; Anna P Kotsia; Nicholas Lembo; David E Kandzari; James Lee; Anna Kalynych; Harold Carlson; Santiago Garcia; Subhash Banerjee; Craig A Thompson; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Successful percutaneous coronary intervention for an in-stent chronic total occlusion in a patient with dextrocardia: a case report.

Authors:  Johannes Wild; Tommaso Gori; Thomas Münzel; Philip Wenzel
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  A comparison of procedural success rate and long-term clinical outcomes between in-stent restenosis chronic total occlusion and de novo chronic total occlusion using multicenter registry data.

Authors:  Seung Hun Lee; Jae Young Cho; Je Sang Kim; Hyun Jong Lee; Jeong Hoon Yang; Jae Hyoung Park; Soon Jun Hong; Rak Kyeong Choi; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Do-Sun Lim; Cheol Woong Yu
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Procedural Results and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for in-Stent Restenosis Chronic Total Occlusion Compared with de novo Chronic Total Occlusion.

Authors:  Guodong Tang; Naixin Zheng; Guojian Yang; Hui Li; Hu Ai; Ying Zhao; Fucheng Sun; Huiping Zhang
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-09-15

Review 5.  Procedure planning: anatomical determinants of strategy.

Authors:  Colm Hanratty; Simon Walsh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2014-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.