Literature DB >> 21640776

Lack of correlation between BCG-induced tuberculin skin test sensitisation and protective immunity in cattle.

A O Whelan1, M Coad, B L Upadhyay, D J Clifford, R G Hewinson, H M Vordermeier.   

Abstract

Vaccination of cattle with Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) can provide significant protection against bovine tuberculosis (TB). However, BCG vaccination sensitises animals to respond to the tuberculin skin-test. This provides a potential operational impediment to the use of BCG as a cattle vaccine since the tuberculin skin-test is the primary surveillance tool used by many countries with 'test and slaughter' control strategies. Currently, it is also unclear what BCG-induced skin-test conversion means in respects to BCG's protective immunity. In the current study we first investigated the duration of tuberculin skin-test sensitisation in calves neonatally vaccinated with BCG. BCG vaccination induced strong skin-test responses in calves during their first 6 months. However, a rapid decay in skin-test sensitivity was observed after this time. Between 6 and 9 months this represented a reduction from 80% to 8% of calves providing a positive response in the single intradermal comparative cervical tuberculin test at standard interpretation. We next investigated the relationship between BCG induced skin-test sensitivity and retention of protective immunity. Calves were neonatally vaccinated with BCG and subsequently divided into 2 groups based on retention or loss of tuberculin skin-test responses after 6 months. In contrast to their skin-test responsiveness, these vaccinates maintained their tuberculin specific IFN-γ blood responses. Moreover, irrespective of their pre-challenge skin-test responses, following M. bovis challenge both groups of BCG vaccinated calves demonstrated comparable levels of protection, as evidenced by reduced TB-associated pathology. Therefore, we have demonstrated that following neonatal BCG vaccination of cattle, tuberculin skin-test responder frequencies waned rapidly after 6 months but importantly, loss of skin-test sensitivity did not correlate with loss of protective immunity. These findings could have implications for the practical application of BCG based cattle vaccines. Crown
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21640776     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.05.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  15 in total

1.  Use of antigen-specific interleukin-2 to differentiate between cattle vaccinated with Mycobacterium bovis BCG and cattle infected with M. bovis.

Authors:  Shelley G Rhodes; Lucy C McKinna; Sabine Steinbach; Gilly S Dean; Bernardo Villarreal-Ramos; Adam O Whelan; C Pirson; Gareth J Jones; Derek Clifford; H Martin Vordermeier
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-10-30

2.  Tuberculin Skin Testing Boosts Interferon Gamma Responses to DIVA Reagents in Mycobacterium bovis-Infected Cattle.

Authors:  Gareth J Jones; Mick Coad; Bhagwati Khatri; Javier Bezos; Natalie A Parlane; Bryce M Buddle; Bernardo Villarreal-Ramos; R Glyn Hewinson; H Martin Vordermeier
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2017-05-05

3.  Test performance data demonstrates utility of a cattle DIVA skin test reagent (DST-F) compatible with BCG vaccination.

Authors:  Gareth J Jones; Timm Konold; Shellene Hurley; Tom Holder; Sabine Steinbach; Mick Coad; D Neil Wedlock; Bryce M Buddle; Mahavir Singh; H Martin Vordermeier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Subcutaneous administration of a 10-fold-lower dose of a commercial human tuberculosis vaccine, Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin Danish, induced levels of protection against bovine tuberculosis and responses in the tuberculin intradermal test similar to those induced by a standard cattle dose.

Authors:  Bryce M Buddle; R Glyn Hewinson; H Martin Vordermeier; D Neil Wedlock
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-08-07

5.  The intractable challenge of evaluating cattle vaccination as a control for bovine Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Andrew James Kerr Conlan; Martin Vordermeier; Mart Cm de Jong; James Ln Wood
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Revaccination of cattle with bacille Calmette-Guérin two years after first vaccination when immunity has waned, boosted protection against challenge with Mycobacterium bovis.

Authors:  Natalie A Parlane; Dairu Shu; Supatsak Subharat; D Neil Wedlock; Bernd H A Rehm; Geoffrey W de Lisle; Bryce M Buddle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Potential benefits of cattle vaccination as a supplementary control for bovine tuberculosis.

Authors:  Andrew J K Conlan; Ellen Brooks Pollock; Trevelyan J McKinley; Andrew P Mitchell; Gareth J Jones; Martin Vordermeier; James L N Wood
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Proteomic characterisation of bovine and avian purified protein derivatives and identification of specific antigens for serodiagnosis of bovine tuberculosis.

Authors:  José Antonio Infantes-Lorenzo; Inmaculada Moreno; María de Los Ángeles Risalde; Álvaro Roy; Margarita Villar; Beatriz Romero; Nieves Ibarrola; José de la Fuente; Eugenia Puentes; Lucía de Juan; Christian Gortázar; Javier Bezos; Lucas Domínguez; Mercedes Domínguez
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.988

9.  Oral Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Does Not Interfere with the Antemortem Diagnostic Techniques for Tuberculosis in Goats.

Authors:  Alvaro Roy; María A Risalde; Carmen Casal; Beatriz Romero; Lucía de Juan; Ahmed M Menshawy; Alberto Díez-Guerrier; Ramon A Juste; Joseba M Garrido; Iker A Sevilla; Christian Gortázar; Lucas Domínguez; Javier Bezos
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-08-07

Review 10.  Epidemiology, diagnostics, and management of tuberculosis in domestic cattle and deer in New Zealand in the face of a wildlife reservoir.

Authors:  B M Buddle; G W de Lisle; J F T Griffin; S A Hutchings
Journal:  N Z Vet J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 1.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.