Literature DB >> 21640608

Barriers to the use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for in-hospital strokes.

Marjorie E Bunch1, Edward C Nunziato, Daniel L Labovitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients who have ischemic strokes (ISs) while hospitalized for other conditions may be less likely to receive intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) when compared to patients who have strokes in the community. This study explored possible barriers to IV tPA use in these patients.
METHODS: Stroke diagnosis was confirmed by chart review for all adult patients admitted to Bellevue Hospital between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2008 who were discharged with a primary or secondary International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition code for transient ischemic attack, intracerebral hemorrhage, or IS. Circumstances at stroke onset were recorded for all patients who had strokes while hospitalized for another reason.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine in-hospital IS cases were identified; 18 (23%) occurred <2 weeks after major surgery, and another 14 (18%) had a delayed diagnosis because signs were not readily detectable on clinical examination. Twenty-four patients (30%) were eligible for IV tPA, of whom 13 were identified within 3 hours of onset and 10 (13%) were treated with IV tPA. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was higher in hospitalized patients (13) than in patients admitted through the emergency department (5; P < .001 using the Wilcoxon rank sum test).
CONCLUSIONS: Seventy percent of in-hospital IS cases in our single hospital retrospective study were postoperative, clinically subtle, or had contraindications to IV tPA, preventing its use. Of the remaining untreated patients, the biggest barrier to IV tPA administration was delay in stroke discovery, which was largely dependent on observation by hospital staff or family rather than patient report.
Copyright © 2012 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21640608     DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1052-3057            Impact factor:   2.136


  4 in total

Review 1.  How can we improve stroke thrombolysis rates? A review of health system factors and approaches associated with thrombolysis administration rates in acute stroke care.

Authors:  Christine L Paul; Annika Ryan; Shiho Rose; John R Attia; Erin Kerr; Claudia Koller; Christopher R Levi
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 7.327

2.  A comparison of trends in stroke care and outcomes between in-hospital and community-onset stroke - The South London Stroke Register.

Authors:  Eva S Emmett; Abdel Douiri; Iain J Marshall; Charles D A Wolfe; Anthony G Rudd; Ajay Bhalla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A Pilot Study Validating Video-Based Training on Pre-Hospital Stroke Recognition.

Authors:  Aliza Brown; Sanjeeva Onteddu; Rohan Sharma; Nidhi Kapoor; Krishna Nalleballe; Appathurai Balamurugan; Sukumar Gundapaneni; Nicolas Bianchi; Robert Skinner; William Culp
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Res       Date:  2019-01-17

4.  Staff perspectives from Australian hospitals seeking to improve implementation of thrombolysis care for acute stroke.

Authors:  Christine Paul; Catherine D'Este; Annika Ryan; Amanda Jayakody; John Attia; Christopher Oldmeadow; Erin Kerr; Frans Henskens; Alice Grady; Christopher R Levi
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-07-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.