OBJECTIVE: This study explored communication between pharmacists and patients through application of the Calgary-Cambridge guide [1] to appointment-based pharmacist-patient consultations and considers use of the guide in pharmacy education. METHODS: Eighteen patients attending appointment-based consultations with five pharmacists were recruited to this qualitative study. Consultations were audio-recorded and observed. Transcripts were coded according to the use of skills within the guide and analysed thematically. RESULTS: The results showed good use of many skills by pharmacists, particularly signposting and closing the session. Some skills were poorly represented such as listening effectively, eliciting the patient's perspective, effective use of computers and creating patient-centred consultations. A key theme of social conversation was present in the data but this skill was not defined in the guide. CONCLUSIONS: The Calgary-Cambridge guide was developed for use in medical consultations but its application to pharmacist-patient consultations showed that the guide could be successfully used in pharmacy with some minor alterations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pharmacists may need more training to improve the use of specific communication skills including how to conduct a patient-centred consultation. The Calgary-Cambridge guide is well aligned with many aspects of pharmacist-patient consultations and could help pharmacists to improve their consultation skills.
OBJECTIVE: This study explored communication between pharmacists and patients through application of the Calgary-Cambridge guide [1] to appointment-based pharmacist-patient consultations and considers use of the guide in pharmacy education. METHODS: Eighteen patients attending appointment-based consultations with five pharmacists were recruited to this qualitative study. Consultations were audio-recorded and observed. Transcripts were coded according to the use of skills within the guide and analysed thematically. RESULTS: The results showed good use of many skills by pharmacists, particularly signposting and closing the session. Some skills were poorly represented such as listening effectively, eliciting the patient's perspective, effective use of computers and creating patient-centred consultations. A key theme of social conversation was present in the data but this skill was not defined in the guide. CONCLUSIONS: The Calgary-Cambridge guide was developed for use in medical consultations but its application to pharmacist-patient consultations showed that the guide could be successfully used in pharmacy with some minor alterations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pharmacists may need more training to improve the use of specific communication skills including how to conduct a patient-centred consultation. The Calgary-Cambridge guide is well aligned with many aspects of pharmacist-patient consultations and could help pharmacists to improve their consultation skills.
Authors: Charlene R Williams; Philip T Rodgers; Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Thomas A Angelo; Greene Shepherd Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Richard Lowrie; Lina Johansson; Paul Forsyth; Stuart Lochhead Bryce; Susan McKellar; Niamh Fitzgerald Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2013-11-30
Authors: Bernadette A M Chevalier; Bernadette M Watson; Michael A Barras; William N Cottrell; Daniel J Angus Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marcel J Kooy; Erica C G van Geffen; Eibert R Heerdink; Liset van Dijk; Marcel L Bouvy Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Marcel J Kooij; Eibert R Heerdink; Liset van Dijk; Erica C G van Geffen; Svetlana V Belitser; Marcel L Bouvy Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Jackie Inch; Terry Porteous; Vivienne Maskrey; Annie Blyth; Jackie Burr; Jennifer Cleland; David J Wright; Richard Holland; Christine M Bond; Margaret C Watson Journal: Int J Pharm Pract Date: 2016-09-28
Authors: Carol Rivas; Ratna Sohanpal; Virginia MacNeill; Liz Steed; Elizabeth Edwards; Laurence Antao; Chris Griffiths; Sandra Eldridge; Stephanie Taylor; Robert Walton Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 2.692