Literature DB >> 21640321

Effectiveness of implantable defibrillators in octogenarians and nonagenarians for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

Ure Mezu1, Evan Adelstein, Sandeep Jain, Samir Saba.   

Abstract

Given their advanced age and frequent co-morbidities, it is unclear whether octogenarians and nonagenarians with decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) derive a survival benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in the primary prevention setting. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ICDs, age, and multiple co-morbidities on survival in elderly patients who otherwise meet implantation criteria for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Patients ≥80 years of age who received an ICD for LVEF ≤35% at our institution from 2001 through 2008 (n = 99) were compared to a cohort of patients ≥80 years of age with similarly low LVEF who did not receive an ICD (n = 53). Co-morbid conditions were assessed using the Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI). The overall cohort (n = 152, 84 ± 4 years old, 72% men, 87% with ischemic cardiomyopathy, LVEF 25 ± 7%, CCI 5.9 ± 3.2) was followed for 2.3 ± 2.0 years. Patients with ICDs were younger (82 ± 3 vs 86 ± 4 years, p <0.001) and had fewer co-morbidities reflected in a lower CCI (5.3 ± 3.1 vs 6.7 ± 3.1, p = 0.021). Patients with ICDs also had a trend toward lower LVEF (24 ± 6% vs 27 ± 7%, p = 0.06). During follow-up 93 (61%) patients died, 58 (59%) in the ICD group and 35 (66%) in the no-ICD group. ICD recipients had better 1-year survival compared to patients with no ICD (72% vs 52%, p = 0.014). However, after adjusting for age, LVEF, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and CCI using multivariate Cox models, an ICD did not confer any survival benefit (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 1.20, p = 0.20), whereas age (p = 0.043) and GFR (p = 0.006) were the only independent predictors of survival. In conclusion, age and GFR are the main determinant of survival in octogenarians and nonagenarians with LV dysfunction. After correcting for these parameters, an ICD does not appear to confer a survival benefit.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21640321     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Does the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Benefit Vary With the Estimated Proportional Risk of Sudden Death in Heart Failure Patients?

Authors:  Wayne C Levy; Yanhong Li; Shelby D Reed; Michael R Zile; Ramin Shadman; Todd Dardas; David J Whellan; Kevin A Schulman; Stephen J Ellis; Matthew Neilson; Christopher M O'Connor
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-03

Review 2.  Causes and prevention of sudden cardiac death in the elderly.

Authors:  Patricia Tung; Christine M Albert
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Programmed electrical stimulation for risk stratification of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Asaf Danon; Jorge E Schliamser; Idit Lavi; Arie Militianu
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2014-12-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.