BACKGROUND: The identification of specific serological algorithms allowing the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) is a new challenge for both the clinic and the laboratory. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of three new tests proposed for CD screening with that of the well established IgA tTG, and ascertained whether any combination of these tools might enhance accuracy in diagnosing CD. METHODS: In sera from 329 CD and 374 control children, the following were assayed: IgA tTG; IgA/IgG, which identify tTG-gliadin complexes (Aeskulisa Celi Check and CeliCheck IgGA); IgA/IgG, which identify deamidated gliadin peptides and tTG (QUANTA Lite(TM) h-tTG/DGP Screen). RESULTS: When specificity was set at 100%, the most sensitive index of CD was IgA tTG (75.7%, cut-off=100U), followed by QUANTA Lite(TM) h-tTG/DGP Screen (65.3%, cut-off 145U), Aeskulisa Celi Check (62.6%, cut-off 909U/mL) and CeliCheck IgGA (59.6%, cut-off 977U/mL). Three algorithms were obtained by combining IgA tTG with each of the new tests. The algorithm obtained by measuring IgA tTG and QUANTA Lite(TM) h-tTG/DGP Screen allowed the correct identification of CD in 78.7% of cases (negative predictive value=97.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The two-test based strategy could be used for the cost effective diagnosis of CD.
BACKGROUND: The identification of specific serological algorithms allowing the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) is a new challenge for both the clinic and the laboratory. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of three new tests proposed for CD screening with that of the well established IgA tTG, and ascertained whether any combination of these tools might enhance accuracy in diagnosing CD. METHODS: In sera from 329 CD and 374 control children, the following were assayed: IgA tTG; IgA/IgG, which identify tTG-gliadin complexes (Aeskulisa Celi Check and CeliCheck IgGA); IgA/IgG, which identify deamidated gliadin peptides and tTG (QUANTA Lite(TM) h-tTG/DGP Screen). RESULTS: When specificity was set at 100%, the most sensitive index of CD was IgA tTG (75.7%, cut-off=100U), followed by QUANTA Lite(TM) h-tTG/DGP Screen (65.3%, cut-off 145U), Aeskulisa Celi Check (62.6%, cut-off 909U/mL) and CeliCheck IgGA (59.6%, cut-off 977U/mL). Three algorithms were obtained by combining IgA tTG with each of the new tests. The algorithm obtained by measuring IgA tTG and QUANTA Lite(TM) h-tTG/DGP Screen allowed the correct identification of CD in 78.7% of cases (negative predictive value=97.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The two-test based strategy could be used for the cost effective diagnosis of CD.
Authors: C Betterle; L Ghizzoni; A Cassio; F Baronio; S Cervato; S Garelli; E Barbi; G Tonini Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2011-11-21 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Benjamin Lebwohl; Alberto Rubio-Tapia; Asaad Assiri; Catherine Newland; Stefano Guandalini Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am Date: 2012-08-20
Authors: Isabel A Hujoel; Claire L Jansson-Knodell; Philippe P Hujoel; Margaux L A Hujoel; Rok Seon Choung; Joseph A Murray; Alberto Rubio-Tapia Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 3.174