Literature DB >> 21639701

Computed tomography-based morphometric analysis of the human occipital condyle for occipital condyle-cervical fusion.

Tien V Le1, Elias Dakwar, Shannon Hann, Euclides Effio, Ali A Baaj, Carlos Martinez, Fernando L Vale, Juan S Uribe.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Occipital condyle screws serve as an alternative fixation point in occipital-cervical fusion. Their placement requires a thorough understanding of the anatomy of the occipital condyles and associated structures. This study is a CT-based morphometric analysis of occipital condyles as related to occipital condyle-cervical fusion.
METHODS: A total of 170 patients were examined with CT scans of the craniocervical junction at a single institution, for a total of 340 occipital condyles, between March 6, 2006, and July 30, 2006. All CT scans were negative for traumatic, degenerative, and neoplastic pathological entities. Condylar anteroposterior (AP) length, transverse width, height, projected screw angle, and projected screw lengths were measured on an EBW Portal 2.5 CT Viewer Workstation (Philips Electronics). The longest axis in the AP orientation of the occipital condyle was accepted as the length. The transverse width was a line perpendicular to the midpoint of the long axis. The height was measured in the coronal projection that had the thickest craniocaudal portion of the condyle. The screw trajectory started 5 mm lateral to the medial edge of the condyle and a line was directed anteromedially in the longest axis. The angle was measured relative to the sagittal midline. The screw length was measured from the outer cortex of the posterior wall to the outer cortex of the anterior wall.
RESULTS: The mean ± SD values for occipital condyle measurements were as follows: AP length was 22.38 ± 2.19 mm (range 14.7-27.6 mm); width was 11.18 ± 1.44 mm (range 7.4-19.0 mm); height was 9.92 ± 1.30 mm (range 5.1-14.3 mm); screw angle was 20.30° ± 4.89° (range 8.0°-34.0°); and screw length was 20.30 ± 2.24 mm (range 13.0-27.6 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: These measurements correlate with previous cadaveric and radiographic studies of the occipital condyle, and emphasize the role of preoperative planning for the feasibility of placement of an occipital condyle screw.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21639701     DOI: 10.3171/2011.5.SPINE10778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  5 in total

1.  Morphometric Analysis of the Occipital Condyle and Its Surgical Importance.

Authors:  Sandeep Saluja; Sushant Swaroop Das; Neelam Vasudeva
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

2.  Morphometric Trajectory Analysis for Occipital Condyle Screws.

Authors:  Yu-Kun Du; Si-Yuan Li; Wen-Jiu Yang; Xiang-Yang Wang; Yi-Fang Bi; Jun Dong; Hui Huang; Feng Gao; Gui-Zhi Li; Hua-Wei Wei; Jian-Kun Yang; Yong-Ming Xi
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.071

3.  Occipital condyle screw fixation after posterior decompression for Chiari malformation: Technical report and application.

Authors:  Arpan R Chakraborty; Panayiotis E Pelargos; Camille K Milton; Michael D Martin; Andrew M Bauer; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-11-02

4.  Computed Tomography-Based Occipital Condyle Morphometry in an Indian Population to Assess the Feasibility of Condylar Screws for Occipitocervical Fusion.

Authors:  Abhishek Srivastava; Geetanjali Nanda; Rajat Mahajan; Ankur Nanda; Nirajana Mishra; Srinivasa Karmaran; Sahil Batra; Harvinder Singh Chhabra
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-12-07

5.  Anatomical Parameters for Occipital Condyle Screws: An Analysis of 500 Condyles Using CT Scans.

Authors:  David N Bernstein; Tochukwu C Ikpeze; Kenneth Foxx; Adan Omar; Addisu Mesfin
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-01-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.