Literature DB >> 21639136

Modeling DNA-bending in the nucleosome: role of AA periodicity.

Tatiana R Prytkova1, Xiao Zhu, Jonathan Widom, George C Schatz.   

Abstract

This paper uses atomistic molecular mechanics within the framework of the JUMNA model to study the bending properties of DNA segments, with emphasis on understanding the role of the 10 bp periodicity associated with AA repeats that has been found to dominate in nucleosomal DNA. The calculations impose a bending potential on 18 bp segments that is consistent with nucleosome structures (i.e., radius of curvature of 4.1 nm), and then determine the energies of the minimum energy structures for different values of the rotational register (a measure of the direction of bending of the DNA) subject to forces derived from the Amber force field (parm99bsc0). The results show that sequences that contain the 10 bp repeats but are otherwise random have a narrow distribution of rotational register values that minimize the energy such that it is possible to combine several minimized structures to give the 147 bp nearly planar loop structure of the nucleosome. The rotational register values that lead to minimum bending energy with 10 bp AA repeats have a narrower minor groove, which points toward the histone interior at the positions of the AA repeats, which is a result that matches the experiments. The calculations also show that these sequences have a relatively flat potential energy landscape for bending to a 4.1 nm radius of curvature. Random sequences that do not have the 10 bp AA repeats have less stable bent structures, and a flat rotational register distribution, such that low energy nearly planar loops are less likely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21639136      PMCID: PMC3140867          DOI: 10.1021/jp203564q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  42 in total

1.  Kinetic and thermodynamic DNA elasticity at micro- and mesoscopic scales.

Authors:  Alexey K Mazur
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  High flexibility of DNA on short length scales probed by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Paul A Wiggins; Thijn van der Heijden; Fernando Moreno-Herrero; Andrew Spakowitz; Rob Phillips; Jonathan Widom; Cees Dekker; Philip C Nelson
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Protein-DNA binding specificity: a grid-enabled computational approach applied to single and multiple protein assemblies.

Authors:  Krystyna Zakrzewska; Benjamin Bouvier; Alexis Michon; Christophe Blanchet; Richard Lavery
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 4.  What controls nucleosome positions?

Authors:  Eran Segal; Jonathan Widom
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome.

Authors:  Noam Kaplan; Irene K Moore; Yvonne Fondufe-Mittendorf; Andrea J Gossett; Desiree Tillo; Yair Field; Emily M LeProust; Timothy R Hughes; Jason D Lieb; Jonathan Widom; Eran Segal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Poly(dA:dT) tracts: major determinants of nucleosome organization.

Authors:  Eran Segal; Jonathan Widom
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 7.  From DNA sequence to transcriptional behaviour: a quantitative approach.

Authors:  Eran Segal; Jonathan Widom
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition.

Authors:  Remo Rohs; Sean M West; Alona Sosinsky; Peng Liu; Richard S Mann; Barry Honig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Using DNA mechanics to predict in vitro nucleosome positions and formation energies.

Authors:  Alexandre V Morozov; Karissa Fortney; Daria A Gaykalova; Vasily M Studitsky; Jonathan Widom; Eric D Siggia
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Preferentially quantized linker DNA lengths in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ji-Ping Wang; Yvonne Fondufe-Mittendorf; Liqun Xi; Guei-Feng Tsai; Eran Segal; Jonathan Widom
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  7 in total

1.  Categorical spectral analysis of periodicity in nucleosomal DNA.

Authors:  Hu Jin; H Tomas Rube; Jun S Song
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The CentO satellite confers translational and rotational phasing on cenH3 nucleosomes in rice centromeres.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Paul B Talbert; Wenli Zhang; Yufeng Wu; Zujun Yang; Jorja G Henikoff; Steven Henikoff; Jiming Jiang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Molecular dynamics study of the role of the spine of hydration in DNA A-tracts in determining nucleosome occupancy.

Authors:  Xiao Zhu; George C Schatz
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Epigenetic engineering of yeast reveals dynamic molecular adaptation to methylation stress and genetic modulators of specific DNMT3 family members.

Authors:  Alex I Finnegan; Somang Kim; Hu Jin; Michael Gapinske; Wendy S Woods; Pablo Perez-Pinera; Jun S Song
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Simple and Complex Centromeric Satellites in Drosophila Sibling Species.

Authors:  Paul B Talbert; Sivakanthan Kasinathan; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  De novo assembly of a young Drosophila Y chromosome using single-molecule sequencing and chromatin conformation capture.

Authors:  Shivani Mahajan; Kevin H-C Wei; Matthew J Nalley; Lauren Gibilisco; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  The genetics and epigenetics of satellite centromeres.

Authors:  Paul B Talbert; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 9.438

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.