Literature DB >> 21638278

Outcomes after adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of high-risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUT-UC): results from a large multicenter collaborative study.

Maria Vassilakopoulou1, Thibault de la Motte Rouge, Pierre Colin, Adil Ouzzane, David Khayat, Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, Christos A Papadimitriou, Aristotle Bamias, Géraldine Pignot, François Xavier Nouhaud, Sophie Hurel, Laurent Guy, Pierre Bigot, Mathieu Roumiguié, Morgan Rouprêt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUT-UC) was a rare, aggressive urologic cancer with a propensity for multifocality, local recurrence, and metastasis. High-risk patients had poor outcomes. Because of the rarity of these tumors, randomized clinical trials and data regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced tumors are currently unavailable. Our objective was to assess the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy and the impact of potential prognostic factors on survival in high-risk, postsurgical UUT-UC patients.
METHODS: Using a multi-institutional, international retrospective database, identified were 627 patients with high risk UUT-UCs (pT3N0, pT4N0 and/or N+ and/or M+) who underwent surgical removal. Only patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were included.
RESULTS: Overall, 140 patients (22.6%) with a median age of 67 years were included. The median follow-up was 22.5 months. The 5-year, overall survival for the entire cohort was 43%, the 5-year recurrence-free survival was 54%, and metastasis-free survival was 53% at 5 years. Positive surgical margins were an independent prognostic factor for recurrence (P = .06), cancer-specific mortality (P = .05), and overall mortality (P = .02) of any cause. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not linked with overall or cancer-specific survival in patients with high risk disease (adjuvant chemotherapy [n = 140] vs no treatment [n = 487]) (P >.5).
CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy did not offer any significant benefit to overall survival in our population. Additional data were necessary, and studies enrolling patients at high risk in clinical trials investigating neoadjuvant chemotherapy in conjunction with chemotherapy should have been highly encouraged.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21638278     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  29 in total

1.  Prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis.

Authors:  Matthew R Danzig; Katherine Mallin; James M McKiernan; Walter M Stadler; Srikala S Sridhar; Todd M Morgan; Bernard H Bochner; Cheryl T Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  HER2 overexpression is associated with worse outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

Authors:  Francesco Soria; Marco Moschini; Andrea Haitel; Gregory J Wirth; Jose A Karam; Christopher G Wood; Morgan Rouprêt; Vitaly Margulis; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Jay D Raman; Solene-Florence Kammerer-Jacquet; Romain Mathieu; Karim Bensalah; Yair Lotan; Mehmet Özsoy; Mesut Remzi; Kilian M Gust; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Perioperative chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Atiqullah Aziz; Jakub Dobruch; Kees Hendricksen; Luis A Kluth; Andrea Necchi; Aidan Noon; Michael Rink; Florian Roghmann; Roland Seiler; Paolo Gontero; Wassim Kassouf; Shahrokh F Shariat; Evanguelos Xylinas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Sima Porten; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Lianchun Xiao; Vitaly Margulis; Ashish M Kamat; Christopher G Wood; Eric Jonasch; Colin P N Dinney; Surena F Matin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Oncologic outcomes obtained after neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract: a review.

Authors:  Jan Cordier; Guru Sonpavde; Christian G Stief; Derya Tilki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  External validation of the pathological nodal staging score in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A population-based study.

Authors:  Evanguelos Xylinas; Luis Kluth; Malte Rieken; Morgan Rouprêt; Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh; Thomas Clozel; Maxine Sun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Mithat Gonen; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Patterns of Lymphatic Metastases in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma and Proposed Dissection Templates.

Authors:  Surena F Matin; John P Sfakianos; Patrick N Espiritu; Jonathan A Coleman; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  HER2 protein overexpression and gene amplification in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma-an analysis of 171 patients.

Authors:  Yuka Sasaki; Takeshi Sasaki; Taketo Kawai; Teppei Morikawa; Keisuke Matsusaka; Akiko Kunita; Haruki Kume; Ichiro Aoki; Yukio Homma; Masashi Fukayama
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-01-15

9.  Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis: correlation with clinicopathologic parameters.

Authors:  Laleh Ehsani; Adeboye O Osunkoya
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-04-15

Review 10.  The role of systemic chemotherapy in management of upper tract urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Bishoy A Gayed; Gregory R Thoreson; Vitaly Margulis
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.