RATIONALE: Most individuals can accurately assess the risks and rewards associated with choice alternatives and decide accordingly; however, drug users often display maladaptive decision-making, such that choices are biased toward excessively risky options. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a range of drugs of abuse on risky decision-making. METHODS: Male Long-Evans rats were trained in the Risky Decision-Making Task, in which they chose between two levers, one which produced a small, "safe" food reward and the other which produced a large, "risky" food reward. The large reward was accompanied by the risk of a mild footshock, the probability of which increased over the course of each test session (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%). RESULTS: Nicotine (0.6 mg/kg) and amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg) caused a significant decrease in choice of the large risky reward (decreased risk taking). Diazepam (1.0 mg/kg) caused a significant increase in choice of the large risky reward (increased risk taking), whereas morphine (3.0 mg/kg) caused only a trend toward increased choice of the large risky reward. Ethanol had no effect on choice behavior. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that acute administration of drugs of abuse can modulate risk taking in a drug-specific manner, either increasing or decreasing preference for highly rewarding, but risky, options.
RATIONALE: Most individuals can accurately assess the risks and rewards associated with choice alternatives and decide accordingly; however, drug users often display maladaptive decision-making, such that choices are biased toward excessively risky options. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a range of drugs of abuse on risky decision-making. METHODS: Male Long-Evans rats were trained in the Risky Decision-Making Task, in which they chose between two levers, one which produced a small, "safe" food reward and the other which produced a large, "risky" food reward. The large reward was accompanied by the risk of a mild footshock, the probability of which increased over the course of each test session (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%). RESULTS:Nicotine (0.6 mg/kg) and amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg) caused a significant decrease in choice of the large risky reward (decreased risk taking). Diazepam (1.0 mg/kg) caused a significant increase in choice of the large risky reward (increased risk taking), whereas morphine (3.0 mg/kg) caused only a trend toward increased choice of the large risky reward. Ethanol had no effect on choice behavior. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that acute administration of drugs of abuse can modulate risk taking in a drug-specific manner, either increasing or decreasing preference for highly rewarding, but risky, options.
Authors: R D Rogers; A M Owen; H C Middleton; E J Williams; J D Pickard; B J Sahakian; T W Robbins Journal: J Neurosci Date: 1999-10-15 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Shibley Rahman; Trevor W Robbins; John R Hodges; Mitul A Mehta; Peter J Nestor; Luke Clark; Barbara J Sahakian Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Nicholas W Simon; Karienn S Montgomery; Blanca S Beas; Marci R Mitchell; Candi L LaSarge; Ian A Mendez; Cristina Bañuelos; Colin M Vokes; Aaron B Taylor; Rebecca P Haberman; Jennifer L Bizon; Barry Setlow Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Marci R Mitchell; Virginia G Weiss; B Sofia Beas; Drake Morgan; Jennifer L Bizon; Barry Setlow Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: J David Jentsch; James R Ashenhurst; M Catalina Cervantes; Stephanie M Groman; Alexander S James; Zachary T Pennington Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2014-03-21 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Caitlin A Orsini; Markie L Willis; Ryan J Gilbert; Jennifer L Bizon; Barry Setlow Journal: Behav Neurosci Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 1.912