BACKGROUND: Sun protection messages in the United States emphasize sunscreen use, although its efficacy in skin cancer prevention remains controversial. METHODS: We used data from NHANES 2003-2006, restricted to adult whites (n = 3,052) to evaluate how Americans protect themselves from the sun. Participants completed questionnaires on the frequency with which they used sunscreen, wore a hat, long sleeves, or stayed in the shade, in addition to the number of sunburns in the past year. RESULTS: Although using sunscreen is the most common sun protective behavior (30%), frequent sunscreen use was not associated with fewer sunburns. However, the odds of multiple sunburns were significantly lower in individuals who frequently avoided the sun by seeking shade (OR = 0.70, p < 0.001) or wearing long sleeves (OR = 0.73, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that shade and protective clothing may be more effective than sunscreen, as typically used by Americans.
BACKGROUND: Sun protection messages in the United States emphasize sunscreen use, although its efficacy in skin cancer prevention remains controversial. METHODS: We used data from NHANES 2003-2006, restricted to adult whites (n = 3,052) to evaluate how Americans protect themselves from the sun. Participants completed questionnaires on the frequency with which they used sunscreen, wore a hat, long sleeves, or stayed in the shade, in addition to the number of sunburns in the past year. RESULTS: Although using sunscreen is the most common sun protective behavior (30%), frequent sunscreen use was not associated with fewer sunburns. However, the odds of multiple sunburns were significantly lower in individuals who frequently avoided the sun by seeking shade (OR = 0.70, p < 0.001) or wearing long sleeves (OR = 0.73, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that shade and protective clothing may be more effective than sunscreen, as typically used by Americans.
Authors: Amanda J Samanek; Emma J Croager; Peter Gies; Elizabeth Milne; Richard Prince; Anthony J McMichael; Robyn M Lucas; Terry Slevin Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2006-04-03 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: A Green; G Williams; R Neale; V Hart; D Leslie; P Parsons; G C Marks; P Gaffney; D Battistutta; C Frost; C Lang; A Russell Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-08-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: H Irene Hall; Mona Saraiya; Trevor Thompson; Anne Hartman; Karen Glanz; Barbara Rimer Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2003 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Dawn M Holman; Zahava Berkowitz; Gery P Guy; Nikki A Hawkins; Mona Saraiya; Meg Watson Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Miryam Yusufov; Joseph S Rossi; Colleen A Redding; Hui-Qing Yin; Andrea L Paiva; Wayne F Velicer; Geoffrey W Greene; Bryan Blissmer; Mark L Robbins; James O Prochaska Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2016-02
Authors: Bridget Grahmann Parsons; Lisa H Gren; Sara E Simonsen; Garrett Harding; Douglas Grossman; Yelena P Wu Journal: J Community Health Date: 2018-04
Authors: Dawn M Holman; Helen Ding; Gery P Guy; Meg Watson; Anne M Hartman; Frank M Perna Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Alexander H Fischer; Timothy S Wang; Gayane Yenokyan; Sewon Kang; Anna L Chien Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Alan C Geller; Nina G Jablonski; Sherry L Pagoto; Jennifer L Hay; Joel Hillhouse; David B Buller; W Larry Kenney; June K Robinson; Richard B Weller; Megan A Moreno; Barbara A Gilchrest; Craig Sinclair; Jamie Arndt; Jennifer M Taber; Kasey L Morris; Laura A Dwyer; Frank M Perna; William M P Klein; Jerry Suls Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Guillermo Sánchez; John Nova; Andrea Esperanza Rodriguez-Hernandez; Roger David Medina; Carolina Solorzano-Restrepo; Jenny Gonzalez; Miguel Olmos; Kathie Godfrey; Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-07-25