PURPOSE: Enzyme replacement therapy with rhGAA (Myozyme®) has lead to improved survival, which is largely attributable to improvements in cardiomyopathy and skeletal muscle function. However, crossreactive immunologic material-negative patients have a poor clinical response to enzyme replacement therapy secondary to high sustained antibody titers. Furthermore, although the majority of crossreactive immunologic material-positive patients tolerize or experience a downtrend in anti-rhGAA antibody titers, antibody response is variable with some crossreactive immunologic material-positive infants also mounting high sustained antibody titers. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 34 infants with Pompe disease: 11 crossreactive immunologic material-negative patients, nine high-titer crossreactive immunologic material-positive patients, and 14 low-titer crossreactive immunologic material-positive patients. Clinical outcome measures were overall survival, ventilator-free survival, left ventricular mass index, Alberta Infant Motor Scale score, and urine Glc(4) levels. RESULTS: Clinical outcomes in the high-titer crossreactive immunologic material-positive group were poor across all areas evaluated relative to the low-titer crossreactive immunologic material-positive group. For the crossreactive immunologic material-negative and high-titer crossreactive immunologic material-positive groups, no statistically significant differences were observed for any outcome measures, and both patient groups did poorly. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that, irrespective of crossreactive immunologic material status, patients with infantile Pompe disease with high sustained antibody titer have an attenuated therapeutic response to enzyme replacement therapy. With the advent of immunomodulation therapies, identification of patients at risk for developing high sustained antibody titer is critical.
PURPOSE: Enzyme replacement therapy with rhGAA (Myozyme®) has lead to improved survival, which is largely attributable to improvements in cardiomyopathy and skeletal muscle function. However, crossreactive immunologic material-negative patients have a poor clinical response to enzyme replacement therapy secondary to high sustained antibody titers. Furthermore, although the majority of crossreactive immunologic material-positive patients tolerize or experience a downtrend in anti-rhGAA antibody titers, antibody response is variable with some crossreactive immunologic material-positive infants also mounting high sustained antibody titers. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 34 infants with Pompe disease: 11 crossreactive immunologic material-negative patients, nine high-titer crossreactive immunologic material-positive patients, and 14 low-titer crossreactive immunologic material-positive patients. Clinical outcome measures were overall survival, ventilator-free survival, left ventricular mass index, Alberta Infant Motor Scale score, and urine Glc(4) levels. RESULTS: Clinical outcomes in the high-titer crossreactive immunologic material-positive group were poor across all areas evaluated relative to the low-titer crossreactive immunologic material-positive group. For the crossreactive immunologic material-negative and high-titer crossreactive immunologic material-positive groups, no statistically significant differences were observed for any outcome measures, and both patient groups did poorly. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that, irrespective of crossreactive immunologic material status, patients with infantile Pompe disease with high sustained antibody titer have an attenuated therapeutic response to enzyme replacement therapy. With the advent of immunomodulation therapies, identification of patients at risk for developing high sustained antibody titer is critical.
Authors: L Klinge; V Straub; U Neudorf; J Schaper; T Bosbach; K Görlinger; M Wallot; S Richards; T Voit Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2004-11-26 Impact factor: 4.296
Authors: Juna M de Vries; Nadine A M E van der Beek; Marian A Kroos; Lale Ozkan; Pieter A van Doorn; Susan M Richards; Crystal C C Sung; Jan-Dietert C Brugma; Adrienne A M Zandbergen; Ans T van der Ploeg; Arnold J J Reuser Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2010-08-14 Impact factor: 4.797
Authors: Baodong Sun; Andrew Bird; Sarah P Young; Priya S Kishnani; Y-T Chen; Dwight D Koeberl Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2007-09-21 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Nina Raben; Shoichi Takikita; Maria G Pittis; Bruno Bembi; Suely K N Marie; Ashley Roberts; Laura Page; Priya S Kishnani; Benedikt G H Schoser; Yin-Hsiu Chien; Evelyn Ralston; Kanneboyina Nagaraju; Paul H Plotz Journal: Autophagy Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 16.016
Authors: A Amalfitano; A R Bengur; R P Morse; J M Majure; L E Case; D L Veerling; J Mackey; P Kishnani; W Smith; A McVie-Wylie; J A Sullivan; G E Hoganson; J A Phillips; G B Schaefer; J Charrow; R E Ware; E H Bossen; Y T Chen Journal: Genet Med Date: 2001 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Mary-Alice Abbott; Sean N Prater; Suhrad G Banugaria; Susan M Richards; Sarah P Young; Amy S Rosenberg; Priya S Kishnani Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 4.797
Authors: A Broomfield; J Fletcher; J Davison; N Finnegan; M Fenton; A Chikermane; C Beesley; K Harvey; E Cullen; C Stewart; S Santra; S Vijay; M Champion; L Abulhoul; S Grunewald; A Chakrapani; M A Cleary; S A Jones; A Vellodi Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 4.982