Aaron B Holley1, Christopher J Lettieri2, Anita A Shah3. 1. Department of Pulmonary/Sleep and Critical Care Medicine, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD. Electronic address: aholley9@gmail.com. 2. Department of Pulmonary/Sleep and Critical Care Medicine, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD. 3. Pulmonary and Critical Care Department, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to establish the efficacy of an adjustable oral appliance (aOA) in the largest patient population studied to date, to our knowledge, and to provide a comparison with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients using an aOA. Results of overnight polysomnography with aOA titration were evaluated and compared with CPAP. Predictors of a successful aOA titration were determined using a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients were given an aOA during the specified time period. The aOA reduced the mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to 8.4 ± 11.4, and 70.3%, 47.6%, and 41.4% of patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease achieved an AHI < 5, respectively. Patients using an aOA decreased their mean Epworth Sleepiness Score by 2.71 (95% CI, 2.3-3.2; P < .001) at follow-up. CPAP improved the AHI by -3.43 (95% CI, 1.88-4.99; P < .001) when compared with an aOA, but when adjusted for severity of disease, this difference only reached significance for patients with severe disease (-5.88 [95% CI, -8.95 to -2.82; P < .001]). However, 70.1% of all patients achieved an AHI < 5 using CPAP compared with 51.6% for the aOA (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, baseline AHI was a significant predictor of achieving an AHI < 5 on aOA titration, and age showed a trend toward significance. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with past reports, more patients in our study achieved an AHI < 5 using an aOA. The aOA is comparable to CPAP for patients with mild disease, whereas CPAP is superior for patients with moderate to severe disease. A lower AHI was the only predictor of a successful aOA titration.
BACKGROUND: We sought to establish the efficacy of an adjustable oral appliance (aOA) in the largest patient population studied to date, to our knowledge, and to provide a comparison with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients using an aOA. Results of overnight polysomnography with aOA titration were evaluated and compared with CPAP. Predictors of a successful aOA titration were determined using a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients were given an aOA during the specified time period. The aOA reduced the mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to 8.4 ± 11.4, and 70.3%, 47.6%, and 41.4% of patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease achieved an AHI < 5, respectively. Patients using an aOA decreased their mean Epworth Sleepiness Score by 2.71 (95% CI, 2.3-3.2; P < .001) at follow-up. CPAP improved the AHI by -3.43 (95% CI, 1.88-4.99; P < .001) when compared with an aOA, but when adjusted for severity of disease, this difference only reached significance for patients with severe disease (-5.88 [95% CI, -8.95 to -2.82; P < .001]). However, 70.1% of all patients achieved an AHI < 5 using CPAP compared with 51.6% for the aOA (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, baseline AHI was a significant predictor of achieving an AHI < 5 on aOA titration, and age showed a trend toward significance. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with past reports, more patients in our study achieved an AHI < 5 using an aOA. The aOA is comparable to CPAP for patients with mild disease, whereas CPAP is superior for patients with moderate to severe disease. A lower AHI was the only predictor of a successful aOA titration.
Authors: Kate Sutherland; Hisashi Takaya; Jin Qian; Peter Petocz; Andrew T Ng; Peter A Cistulli Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2015-08-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: John Reid; Regina Taylor-Gjevre; John Gjevre; Robert Skomro; Mark Fenton; Femi Olatunbosun; John R Gordon; David Cotton Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: M Dieltjens; O M Vanderveken; D Van den Bosch; K Wouters; J Denollet; J A Verbraecken; P H Van de Heyning; M J Braem Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Bradley A Edwards; Christopher Andara; Shane Landry; Scott A Sands; Simon A Joosten; Robert L Owens; David P White; Garun S Hamilton; Andrew Wellman Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 21.405