Literature DB >> 21636289

Systematic review of efficacy of dose-dense versus non-dose-dense chemotherapy in breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-small cell lung cancer.

Gary H Lyman1, Richard L Barron, Jaime L Natoli, Ross M Miller.   

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have suggested a potential advantage of dose-dense chemotherapy in improving disease-free and overall survival in patients with certain malignancies. This systematic review summarizes the literature on the efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy across various cancers (breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL], and non-small cell lung cancer) and chemotherapy regimens. Among the 17 trials identified, few reported statistically significant differences between dose-dense and standard chemotherapy, and most were small with limited statistical power. Statistically significant differences in overall survival favoring dose-dense schedules were apparent among large RCTs in potentially curative settings such as early-stage breast cancer and NHL. Clinical and treatment heterogeneity demonstrated the flexibility of the dose-dense paradigm but also precluded quantitative meta-analysis of results. Further study of dose-dense schedules based on large RCTs is needed to demonstrate the consistency and generalizability of these findings. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21636289     DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  9 in total

Review 1.  A way forward on the medically appropriate use of white cell growth factors.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Bruce E Hillner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Weight-based chemotherapy dosing in obese patients with cancer: back to the future.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 3.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors as prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Sol Cortés de Miguel; Miguel Ángel Calleja-Hernández; Salomón Menjón-Beltrán; Inmaculada Vallejo-Rodríguez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia during cancer therapy.

Authors:  Charles L Bennett; Benjamin Djulbegovic; LeAnn B Norris; James O Armitage
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Predicting neutropenia risk in patients with cancer using electronic data.

Authors:  Pamala A Pawloski; Avis J Thomas; Sheryl Kane; Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; Gary R Shapiro; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  How to mathematically optimize drug regimens using optimal control.

Authors:  Helen Moore
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  Cardiac involvement in disseminated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, successful management with chemotherapy dose reduction guided by cardiac imaging: A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Rabah Al-Mehisen; Maha Al-Mohaissen; Hisham Yousef
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 1.337

8.  Dose-dense TPF induction chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer: a phase II study.

Authors:  Ching-Yun Hsieh; Ming-Yuh Lein; Shih-Neng Yang; Yao-Ching Wang; Yin-Jun Lin; Chen-Yuan Lin; Chun-Hung Hua; Ming-Hsul Tsai; Ching-Chan Lin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Second malignant neoplasms in lymphomas, secondary lymphomas and lymphomas in metabolic disorders/diseases.

Authors:  Youxi Yu; Xiaoju Shi; Xingtong Wang; Ping Zhang; Ou Bai; Yan Li
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 7.133

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.