Literature DB >> 21635682

Consumerism and its impact on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Sultan Alkhateeb1, Nathan Lawrentschuk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: • Many experts consider that media coverage, marketing and/or direct-to-consumer advertising, particularly Internet-based forms, are fundamental to the widespread adoption of robotic-assisted prostatectomy (RARP). However, this has not been explored previously. • The primary objective of the present study was to delineate the role of media coverage and marketing of RARP on the Internet, whereas the secondary goal focused on website quality with respect to the presentation of prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: • Website content was evaluated for direct-to-consumer advertising after the retrieval of the first 50 websites using Google and Yahoo for each of the terms: 'robotic prostatectomy, laparoscopic prostatectomy (LP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP)'. • A linear regression analysis was performed for the annual number of Internet news hits over the last decade for each procedure. Website quality assessment was performed using WHO Honesty on the Internet (HON) code principles.
RESULTS: • Of the retrieved sites, the proportion containing direct-to-consumer advertising for RARP vs LP vs ORP using Google was 64% vs 14% vs 0%, respectively (P < 0.001) and, using Yahoo, 80% vs 16% vs 0%, respectively (P < 0.001). • In a linear regression analysis, the r(2) values for news hits for each year over the last 10 years were 0.89, 0.74 and 0.76 for RARP, LP and ORP, respectively. • Website quality assessment found that a minority of the websites were accredited with HONcode principles, with no difference between procedure types (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: • Media coverage and marketing of RARP on the Internet is more widespread compared to LP and ORP. • Disturbingly, the quality of websites using any technique for prostatectomy was of poor quality when using principles of honest information presenting and such findings need to be discussed with respect to obtaining informed consent from patients.
© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21635682     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10117.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  20 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based surgery: barriers, solutions, and the role of evidence synthesis.

Authors:  George Garas; Amel Ibrahim; Hutan Ashrafian; Kamran Ahmed; Vanash Patel; Koji Okabayashi; Petros Skapinakis; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Female urinary incontinence health information quality on the Internet: a multilingual evaluation.

Authors:  Ishani Saraswat; Robert Abouassaly; Peter Dwyer; Damien M Bolton; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  A multilingual evaluation of current health information on the Internet for the treatments of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Emily C Chen; Rustom P Manecksha; Robert Abouassaly; Damien M Bolton; Oliver Reich; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2014-12-30

Review 4.  A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Quoc-Dien Trinh; Anders Bjartell; Stephen J Freedland; Brent K Hollenbeck; Jim C Hu; Shahrokh F Shariat; Maxine Sun; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Trends in the diffusion of robotic surgery in prostate, uterus, and colorectal procedures: a retrospective population-based study.

Authors:  Gary Chung; Piet Hinoul; Paul Coplan; Andrew Yoo
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-06-20

6.  Robotic surgery in urological oncology: patient care or market share?

Authors:  Deborah R Kaye; Jeffrey K Mullins; H Ballentine Carter; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Robotic proctectomy for rectal cancer in the US: a skewed population.

Authors:  Asya Ofshteyn; Katherine Bingmer; Christopher W Towe; Emily Steinhagen; Sharon L Stein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Trends in internet search activity, media coverage, and patient-centered health information after the FDA safety communications on surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Benjamin V Stone; James C Forde; Valerie B Levit; Richard K Lee; Alexis E Te; Bilal Chughtai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Back to baseline: erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy from the patients' perspective.

Authors:  Christian J Nelson; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Prostate Cancer on the Web-Expedient Tool for Patients' Decision-Making?

Authors:  Hendrik Borgmann; Jan-Henning Wölm; Stefan Vallo; Rene Mager; Johannes Huber; Johannes Breyer; Johannes Salem; Stacy Loeb; Axel Haferkamp; Igor Tsaur
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.