Literature DB >> 21634310

A pedometer-based intervention to improve physical activity, fitness, and coronary heart disease risk in National Guard personnel.

Laura A Talbot1, E Jeffrey Metter, Christopher H Morrell, Kevin D Frick, Ali A Weinstein, Jerome L Fleg.   

Abstract

To compare the effects of a pedometer-based behavioral intervention (Fitness for Life [FFL] program) and a traditional high-intensity fitness (TRAD) program on physical activity (PA), Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT), and coronary heart disease risk factors in Army National Guard members who failed the APFT 2-mile run. From a pool of 261 Army National Guard, a total of 156 were randomized to TRAD or FFL for 24 weeks consisting of a 12-week progressive conditioning program followed by 12 weeks of maintenance. For both groups, the total APFT score and 2-mile run time/score improved from baseline to 12 weeks (FFL: down 7.4%, p = 0.03; TRAD: down 5%, p = 0.08) but at 24 weeks they had regressed toward baseline. PA improved modestly and coronary risk profile changed minimally in both groups. A pedometer-based exercise intervention had results similar to a high-intensity program for improving PA, APFT, and 2-mile run times/score. Neither group sustained the improved run times over the 12 weeks of maintenance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21634310      PMCID: PMC6201301          DOI: 10.7205/milmed-d-10-00256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  20 in total

1.  Army Physical Fitness Test scores predict coronary heart disease risk in Army National Guard soldiers.

Authors:  Laura A Talbot; Ali A Weinstein; Jerome L Fleg
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index, and plasma lipid profiles of military reserve officers.

Authors:  P F Kokkinos; J C Holland; R Newman; B Fiest-Fite; C E Signorino
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Reliability and concurrent validity for a 7-d re-call of physical activity in college students.

Authors:  R K Dishman; M Steinhardt
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Training effects of long versus short bouts of exercise in healthy subjects.

Authors:  R F DeBusk; U Stenestrand; M Sheehan; W L Haskell
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1990-04-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project.

Authors:  J F Sallis; W L Haskell; P D Wood; S P Fortmann; T Rogers; S N Blair; R S Paffenbarger
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  The effect of command emphasis and monthly physical training on Army physical fitness scores in a National Guard Unit.

Authors:  G D Powell; D Dumitru; J J Kennedy
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Training effects of short and long bouts of brisk walking in sedentary women.

Authors:  M H Murphy; A E Hardman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Reduction in cardiovascular disease risk factors: 6-month results from Project Active.

Authors:  A L Dunn; B H Marcus; J B Kampert; M E Garcia; H W Kohl; S N Blair
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Leisure-time physical activities and their relationship to cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy men and women 18-95 years old.

Authors:  L A Talbot; E J Metter; J L Fleg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Move to Improve: a randomized workplace trial to increase physical activity.

Authors:  Rod K Dishman; David M DeJoy; Mark G Wilson; Robert J Vandenberg
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  7 in total

1.  Physical Activity for Campus Employees: A University Worksite Wellness Program.

Authors:  Carling E Butler; B Ruth Clark; Tamara L Burlis; Jacqueline C Castillo; Susan B Racette
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2014-06-04

2.  Walking for hypertension.

Authors:  Ling-Ling Lee; Caroline A Mulvaney; Yoko Kin Yoke Wong; Edwin Sy Chan; Michael C Watson; Hui-Hsin Lin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-24

Review 3.  Face-to-face versus remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity.

Authors:  Justin Richards; Margaret Thorogood; Melvyn Hillsdon; Charles Foster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-30

4.  Workplace pedometer interventions for increasing physical activity.

Authors:  Rosanne LA Freak-Poli; Miranda Cumpston; Loai Albarqouni; Stacy A Clemes; Anna Peeters
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-21

5.  Device-measured physical activity, sedentary behaviour and cardiometabolic health and fitness across occupational groups: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie A Prince; Cara G Elliott; Kyle Scott; Sarah Visintini; Jennifer L Reed
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  The effects of step-count monitoring interventions on physical activity: systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based randomised controlled trials in adults.

Authors:  Umar A R Chaudhry; Charlotte Wahlich; Rebecca Fortescue; Derek G Cook; Rachel Knightly; Tess Harris
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Dietary, physical activity, and weight management interventions among active-duty military personnel: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmad M Malkawi; Ree M Meertens; Stef P J Kremers; Ester F C Sleddens
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2018-12-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.