Literature DB >> 21633252

Artifact: recording EEG in special care units.

William O Tatum1, Barbara A Dworetzky, W David Freeman, Donald L Schomer.   

Abstract

Artifacts may be obtained during routine recording but are more common in special care units (SCUs) outside of the EEG laboratory, where complex electrical currents are present that create a "hostile" environment. Special care units include the epilepsy monitoring unit, neurologic intensive care unit, and operating room, where artifact is present in virtually every recording, increasing with prolonged use. Nonepileptic attacks treated as epileptic seizures have been incorrectly diagnosed and treated due to a misinterpreted EEG. The recent emergence of continuous EEG as a neurophysiologic surrogate for brain function in the neurologic intensive care unit and operating room has also brought a greater amount and new types of EEG artifact. The artifacts encountered in special care units during continuous EEG are becoming more complex and may have adverse therapeutic implications. Our knowledge of artifact needs to parallel our growth in technology to avoid the pitfalls that may be incurred during visual analysis of the EEG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21633252     DOI: 10.1097/WNP.

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  8 in total

Review 1.  EEG monitoring during therapeutic hypothermia in neonates, children, and adults.

Authors:  Nicholas S Abend; Ram Mani; Tammy N Tschuda; Tae Chang; Alexis A Topjian; Maureen Donnelly; Denise LaFalce; Margaret C Krauss; Sarah E Schmitt; Joshua M Levine
Journal:  Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol       Date:  2011-09

2.  Consensus statement on continuous EEG in critically ill adults and children, part II: personnel, technical specifications, and clinical practice.

Authors:  Susan T Herman; Nicholas S Abend; Thomas P Bleck; Kevin E Chapman; Frank W Drislane; Ronald G Emerson; Elizabeth E Gerard; Cecil D Hahn; Aatif M Husain; Peter W Kaplan; Suzette M LaRoche; Marc R Nuwer; Mark Quigg; James J Riviello; Sarah E Schmitt; Liberty A Simmons; Tammy N Tsuchida; Lawrence J Hirsch
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.177

3.  The spatial and signal characteristics of physiologic high frequency oscillations.

Authors:  Rafeed Alkawadri; Nicolas Gaspard; Irina I Goncharova; Dennis D Spencer; Jason L Gerrard; Hitten Zaveri; Robert B Duckrow; Hal Blumenfeld; Lawrence J Hirsch
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 5.864

4.  "Water in the Tube" Artifact Mimicking Epileptiform Abnormalities on Point-of-Care EEG.

Authors:  Mauricio F Villamar; Ana C Albuja
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2022-04-04

5.  Evaluation of Dry Sensors for Neonatal EEG Recordings.

Authors:  Igor Fridman; Malaika Cordeiro; Khodayar Rais-Bahrami; Neil J McDonald; James J Reese; An N Massaro; Joan A Conry; Taeun Chang; Walid Soussou; Tammy N Tsuchida
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 6.  How to carry out and interpret EEG recordings in COVID-19 patients in ICU?

Authors:  Philippe Gélisse; Andrea O Rossetti; Pierre Genton; Arielle Crespel; Peter W Kaplan
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Comparing the Performance of Popular MEG/EEG Artifact Correction Methods in an Evoked-Response Study.

Authors:  Niels Trusbak Haumann; Lauri Parkkonen; Marina Kliuchko; Peter Vuust; Elvira Brattico
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-21

8.  Train of four stimulation artifact mimicking a seizure during computerized automated ICU EEG monitoring.

Authors:  Laxmi P Dhakal; William O Tatum; William D Freeman
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav Case Rep       Date:  2017-09-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.