Literature DB >> 21633047

Randomized phase II non-inferiority study (NO16853) of two different doses of capecitabine in combination with docetaxel for locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer.

A U Buzdar1, B Xu2, R Digumarti3, L Goedhals4, X Hu5, V Semiglazov6, S Cheporov7, E Gotovkin8, S Hoersch9, K Rittweger10, D W Miles11, J O'Shaughnessy12, S Tjulandin13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This phase II study investigated whether a lower-than-approved dose of capecitabine, plus docetaxel (XT), would improve tolerability versus standard-dose XT without compromising efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women aged ≥18 years with locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer resistant to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the (neo)adjuvant, first- or second-line metastatic setting were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard-dose XT (capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-14; docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), day 1 every 3 weeks) or low-dose XT (capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-14; docetaxel as above). The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of low-dose to standard-dose XT in terms of progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: 470 patients were randomly allocated in a 1 : 1 ratio to standard-dose or low-dose XT. Median PFS was 7.9 versus 5.8 months [hazard ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-1.43] in the standard-dose and low-dose arms, respectively. The upper limit of the 95% CI was above the predefined non-inferiority margin (1.35, P = 0.078). Secondary efficacy end points were consistent with PFS. The frequency and severity of adverse events was similar in both treatment arms.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-inferiority of low-dose to standard-dose XT in terms of PFS was not demonstrated; this may be due to regional subgroup effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21633047     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  5 in total

1.  Capecitabine in Combination with Docetaxel in First Line in HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: an Observational Study.

Authors:  Renáta Kószó; Dóra Sántha; László Büdi; József Erfán; Károly Győrfy; Zsolt Horváth; Judit Kocsis; László Landherr; Erika Hitre; Károly Máhr; Gábor Pajkos; Zsuzsanna Pápai; Zsuzsanna Kahán
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  The comparison of maintenance treatment with capecitabine (CMT) and non-maintenance treatment with capecitabine (non-CMT) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Guolei Dong; Yan Jia; Xiaorui Wang; Shufen Li; Chen Wang; Yehui Shi; Zhongsheng Tong
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

3.  Simulations to Assess Phase II Noninferiority Trials of Different Doses of Capecitabine in Combination With Docetaxel for Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  R Bruno; L Lindbom; F Schaedeli Stark; P Chanu; F Gilberg; N Frey; L Claret
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2012-12-26

4.  Health-related quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin mesylate or capecitabine in an open-label randomized phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Javier Cortes; Stacie Hudgens; Chris Twelves; Edith A Perez; Ahmad Awada; Louise Yelle; Susan McCutcheon; Peter A Kaufman; Anna Forsythe; Galina Velikova
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Decreased gastrointestinal toxicity associated with a novel capecitabine schedule (7 days on and 7 days off): a systematic review.

Authors:  Karen A Cadoo; Devika Gajria; Emily Suh; Sujata Patil; Maria Theodoulou; Larry Norton; Clifford A Hudis; Tiffany A Traina
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-03-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.