OBJECTIVE: A pilot study evaluated whether the addition of online coaching from a peer specialist increased participation in an online program featuring educational and interactive modules to promote self-management of bipolar disorder. METHODS: A total of 118 participants with bipolar disorder recruited from online and in-person support groups and clinical settings were enrolled inMyRecoveryPlan. Half the group was randomly assigned to receive online coaching support from a certified peer specialist. RESULTS: Participants offered online peer coaching were more likely to return to the program after registration (71% versus 44%, p=.005) and to continue using the program after three weeks (38% versus 9%, p<.001). This pattern was consistent for all program elements. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of online coaching from a peer specialist significantly increased engagement and retention in the program, but further research is needed to evaluate the program's effects on clinical and recovery outcomes.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: A pilot study evaluated whether the addition of online coaching from a peer specialist increased participation in an online program featuring educational and interactive modules to promote self-management of bipolar disorder. METHODS: A total of 118 participants with bipolar disorder recruited from online and in-person support groups and clinical settings were enrolled in MyRecoveryPlan. Half the group was randomly assigned to receive online coaching support from a certified peer specialist. RESULTS:Participants offered online peer coaching were more likely to return to the program after registration (71% versus 44%, p=.005) and to continue using the program after three weeks (38% versus 9%, p<.001). This pattern was consistent for all program elements. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of online coaching from a peer specialist significantly increased engagement and retention in the program, but further research is needed to evaluate the program's effects on clinical and recovery outcomes.
Authors: Judith A Cook; Mary Ellen Copeland; Marie M Hamilton; Jessica A Jonikas; Lisa A Razzano; Carol B Floyd; Walter B Hudson; Rachel T Macfarlane; Dennis D Grey Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: David C Mohr; Jennifer Duffecy; Ling Jin; Evette J Ludman; Adam Lewis; Mark Begale; Martin McCarthy Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2010-12-19 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Greg Clarke; Donna Eubanks; Ed Reid; Chris Kelleher; Elizabeth O'Connor; Lynn L DeBar; Frances Lynch; Sonia Nunley; Christina Gullion Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2005-06-21 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Greg Clarke; Ed Reid; Donna Eubanks; Elizabeth O'Connor; Lynn L DeBar; Chris Kelleher; Frances Lynch; Sonia Nunley Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: John A Naslund; Kelly A Aschbrenner; Lisa A Marsch; Gregory J McHugo; Stephen J Bartels Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Judith G Proudfoot; Amisha Jayawant; Alexis E Whitton; Gordon Parker; Vijaya Manicavasagar; Meg Smith; Jennifer Nicholas Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 3.630