Literature DB >> 21632697

Gynaecological endoscopic evaluation of 4% icodextrin solution: a European, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study of the efficacy and safety in the reduction of de novo adhesions after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery.

G Trew1, G Pistofidis, G Pados, A Lower, L Mettler, D Wallwiener, M Korell, J-L Pouly, M E Coccia, A Audebert, C Nappi, E Schmidt, E McVeigh, S Landi, M Degueldre, P Konincxk, S Rimbach, C Chapron, D Dallay, T Röemer, A McConnachie, I Ford, A Crowe, A Knight, G Dizerega, R Dewilde.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gynaecological laparoscopic surgery outcomes can be compromised by the formation of de novo adhesions. This randomized, double-blind study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of 4% icodextrin solution (Adept(®)) in the reduction of de novo adhesion incidence compared to lactated Ringer's solution (LRS).
METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for removal of myomas or endometriotic cysts were treated with randomized solution as an intra-operative irrigant and 1l post-operative instillate. De novo adhesion incidence (number of sites with adhesions), severity and extent were independently scored at a second-look procedure and the efficacy of the two solutions compared. The effect of surgical covariates on adhesion formation was also investigated. Initial exploratory analysis of individual anatomical sites of clinical importance was progressed. RESULTS Of 498 patients randomized, 330 were evaluable (160 LRS--75% myomectomy/25% endometriotic cysts; 170 Adept--79% myomectomy/21% endometriotic cysts). At study completion, 76.2% LRS and 77.6% Adept had ≥ 1 de novo adhesion. The mean (SD) number of de novo adhesions was 2.58 (2.11) for Adept and 2.58 (2.38) for LRS. The treatment effect difference was not significant (P = 0.909). Assessment of surgical covariates identified significant influences on the mean number of de novo adhesions regardless of treatment, including surgery duration (P = 0.048), blood loss in myomectomy patients (P = 0.019), length of uterine incision in myomectomy patients (P < 0.001) and number of suture knots (P < 0.001). There were 15 adverse events considered treatment-related in the LRS patients (7.2%) and 18 in the Adept group (8.3%). Of 17 reported serious adverse events (9 LRS; 8 Adept) none were considered treatment-related.
CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed the safety of Adept in laparoscopic surgery. The proportion of patients with de novo adhesion formation was considerably higher than previous literature suggested. Overall there was no evidence of a clinical effect but various surgical covariates including surgery duration, blood loss, number and size of incisions, suturing and number of knots were found to influence de novo adhesion formation. The study provides direction for future research into adhesion reduction strategies in site specific surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21632697     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  18 in total

Review 1.  Intracavity lavage and wound irrigation for prevention of surgical site infection.

Authors:  Gill Norman; Ross A Atkinson; Tanya A Smith; Ceri Rowlands; Amber D Rithalia; Emma J Crosbie; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-30

2.  Fouling-resistant zwitterionic polymers for complete prevention of postoperative adhesion.

Authors:  Ershuai Zhang; Boyi Song; Yuanjie Shi; Hui Zhu; Xiangfei Han; Hong Du; Chengbiao Yang; Zhiqiang Cao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Peritoneal adhesions after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Valerio Mais
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Augmented reality in gynecologic surgery: evaluation of potential benefits for myomectomy in an experimental uterine model.

Authors:  Nicolas Bourdel; Toby Collins; Daniel Pizarro; Adrien Bartoli; David Da Ines; Bruno Perreira; Michel Canis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  PVA gel as a potential adhesion barrier: a safety study in a large animal model of intestinal surgery.

Authors:  Bernhard W Renz; Kurt Leitner; Erich Odermatt; Daniel L Worthley; Martin K Angele; Karl-Walter Jauch; Reinhold A Lang
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Influence of 4% icodextrin solution on peritoneal tissue response and adhesion formation.

Authors:  Christian D Klink; Patrick Schickhaus; Marcel Binnebösel; Stefan Jockenhoevel; Rafael Rosch; Rene Tolba; Ulf P Neumann; Uwe Klinge
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Seprafilm(®) adhesion barrier: (2) a review of the clinical literature on intraabdominal use.

Authors:  Michael P Diamond; Ellen L Burns; Beverly Accomando; Sadiqa Mian; Lena Holmdahl
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2012-04-15

8.  Predicting formation of adhesions after gynaecological surgery: development of a risk score.

Authors:  Per Lundorff; Hans Brölmann; Philippe Robert Koninckx; Michal Mara; Arnaud Wattiez; Markus Wallwiener; Geoffrey Trew; Alison M Crowe; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 9.  Plastic and reconstructive uterus operations by minimally invasive surgery? A review on myomectomy.

Authors:  Anja Hirschelmann; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2012-01-09

10.  Should women with chronic pelvic pain have adhesiolysis?

Authors:  Ying C Cheong; Isobel Reading; Sarah Bailey; Khaled Sadek; William Ledger; Tin C Li
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.