Literature DB >> 21632262

TMS effects on subjective and objective measures of vision: stimulation intensity and pre- versus post-stimulus masking.

Tom A de Graaf1, Sonja Cornelsen, Christianne Jacobs, Alexander T Sack.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to mask visual stimuli, disrupting visual task performance or preventing visual awareness. While TMS masking studies generally fix stimulation intensity, we hypothesized that varying the intensity of TMS pulses in a masking paradigm might inform several ongoing debates concerning TMS disruption of vision as measured subjectively versus objectively, and pre-stimulus (forward) versus post-stimulus (backward) TMS masking. We here show that both pre-stimulus TMS pulses and post-stimulus TMS pulses could strongly mask visual stimuli. We found no dissociations between TMS effects on the subjective and objective measures of vision for any masking window or intensity, ruling out the option that TMS intensity levels determine whether dissociations between subjective and objective vision are obtained. For the post-stimulus time window particularly, we suggest that these data provide new constraints for (e.g. recurrent) models of vision and visual awareness. Finally, our data are in line with the idea that pre-stimulus masking operates differently from conventional post-stimulus masking.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21632262     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  8 in total

1.  The right temporoparietal junction plays a causal role in maintaining the internal representation of verticality.

Authors:  Francesca Fiori; Matteo Candidi; Adriano Acciarino; Nicole David; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Spatially specific vs. unspecific disruption of visual orientation perception using chronometric pre-stimulus TMS.

Authors:  Tom A de Graaf; Felix Duecker; Martin H P Fernholz; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 3.  Probing feedforward and feedback contributions to awareness with visual masking and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Evelina Tapia; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-21

Review 4.  Using brain stimulation to disentangle neural correlates of conscious vision.

Authors:  Tom A de Graaf; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-23

5.  Who's afraid of response bias?

Authors:  Megan A K Peters; Tony Ro; Hakwan Lau
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2016-02-27

6.  The temporal dynamics of early visual cortex involvement in behavioral priming.

Authors:  Christianne Jacobs; Tom A de Graaf; Rainer Goebel; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Pre-stimulus sham TMS facilitates target detection.

Authors:  Felix Duecker; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies-Methodological considerations.

Authors:  Joana Leitão; Axel Thielscher; Johannes Tuennerhoff; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.