Literature DB >> 21630473

Candidate molecular mechanisms for establishing cell identity in the developing retina.

Andrew M Garrett1, Robert W Burgess.   

Abstract

In the developing nervous system, individual neurons must occupy appropriate positions within circuits. This requires that these neurons recognize and form connections with specific pre- and postsynaptic partners. Cellular recognition is also required for the spacing of cell bodies and the arborization of dendrites, factors that determine the inputs onto a given neuron. These issues are particularly evident in the retina, where different types of neurons are evenly spaced relative to other cells of the same type. This establishes a reiterated columnar circuitry resembling the insect retina. Establishing these mosaic patterns requires that cells of a given type (homotypic cells) be able to sense their neighbors. Therefore, both synaptic specificity and mosaic spacing require cellular identifiers. In synaptic specificity, recognition often occurs between different types of cells in a pre- and postsynaptic pairing. In mosaic spacing, recognition is often occurring between different cells of the same type, orhomotypic self-recognition. Dendritic arborization can require recognition of different neurites of the same cell, or isoneuronal self-recognition. The retina is an extremely amenable system for studying the molecular identifiers that drive these various forms of recognition. The different neuronal types in the retina are well defined, and the genetic tools for marking cell types are increasingly available. In this review we will summarize retinal anatomy and describe cell types in the retina and how they are defined. We will then describe the requirements of a recognition code and discuss newly emerging candidate molecular mechanisms for recognition that may meet these requirements.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21630473      PMCID: PMC3292780          DOI: 10.1002/dneu.20926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Neurobiol        ISSN: 1932-8451            Impact factor:   3.964


  96 in total

1.  Architecture and activity-mediated refinement of axonal projections from a mosaic of genetically identified retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Andrew D Huberman; Mihai Manu; Selina M Koch; Michael W Susman; Amanda Brosius Lutz; Erik M Ullian; Stephen A Baccus; Ben A Barres
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  The genesis of retinal architecture: an emerging role for mechanical interactions?

Authors:  Lucia Galli-Resta; Paola Leone; David Bottari; Monica Ensini; Elisa Rigosi; Elena Novelli
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2008-02-17       Impact factor: 21.198

3.  Functional and morphological differences among intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Tiffany M Schmidt; Paulo Kofuji
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The protocadherin-alpha family is involved in axonal coalescence of olfactory sensory neurons into glomeruli of the olfactory bulb in mouse.

Authors:  Sonoko Hasegawa; Shun Hamada; You Kumode; Shigeyuki Esumi; Shota Katori; Emi Fukuda; Yasuo Uchiyama; Takahiro Hirabayashi; Peter Mombaerts; Takeshi Yagi
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.314

5.  Cone contacts, mosaics, and territories of bipolar cells in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Heinz Wässle; Christian Puller; Frank Müller; Silke Haverkamp
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A differential developmental pattern of spinal interneuron apoptosis during synaptogenesis: insights from genetic analyses of the protocadherin-gamma gene cluster.

Authors:  Tuhina Prasad; Xiaozhong Wang; Paul A Gray; Joshua A Weiner
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  gamma-Protocadherins regulate neuronal survival but are dispensable for circuit formation in retina.

Authors:  Julie L Lefebvre; Yifeng Zhang; Markus Meister; Xiaozhong Wang; Joshua R Sanes
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Multiple genes on chromosome 7 regulate dopaminergic amacrine cell number in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Irene E Whitney; Mary A Raven; Daniel C Ciobanu; Robert W Williams; Benjamin E Reese
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 9.  Dscam-mediated repulsion controls tiling and self-avoidance.

Authors:  S Sean Millard; S Lawrence Zipursky
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Local N-cadherin interactions mediate distinct steps in the targeting of lamina neurons.

Authors:  Aljoscha Nern; Yan Zhu; S Lawrence Zipursky
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  6 in total

1.  Identification of amacrine subtypes that express the atypical cadherin celsr3.

Authors:  Alaron A Lewis; Joseph T Mahoney; Neil Wilson; Susan E Brockerhoff
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 2.  Design principles and developmental mechanisms underlying retinal mosaics.

Authors:  Benjamin E Reese; Patrick W Keeley
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2014-08-08

3.  DSCAM promotes self-avoidance in the developing mouse retina by masking the functions of cadherin superfamily members.

Authors:  Andrew M Garrett; Andre Khalil; David O Walton; Robert W Burgess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Loss of CPEB3 Upregulates MEGF10 to Impair Mosaic Development of ON Starburst Amacrine Cells.

Authors:  Yin-Peng Chen; Geng-Shuo Bai; Meng-Fang Wu; Chuan-Chin Chiao; Yi-Shuian Huang
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.639

5.  Replacing the PDZ-interacting C-termini of DSCAM and DSCAML1 with epitope tags causes different phenotypic severity in different cell populations.

Authors:  Andrew M Garrett; Abigail Ld Tadenev; Yuna T Hammond; Peter G Fuerst; Robert W Burgess
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  DSCAMs: restoring balance to developmental forces.

Authors:  Andrew M Garrett; Abigail L D Tadenev; Robert W Burgess
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 5.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.