Kevin R Forward1. 1. Departments of Medicine, Microbiology & Immunology, and Pathology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The frequency of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae coinfection can vary depending on their individual incidence and prevalence rates. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae coinfections by evaluating the results of testing in 2007 and 2008 to better inform testing and treatment decisions. METHODS: Specimens from the same patient submitted on the same day served as the basis for the present study. The age, sex and the source of the specimen were also linked to the accession number. Infection and coinfection rates were analyzed in both males and females. RESULTS: Concurrent testing was performed on 41,567 female specimens and 1827 male specimens, of which, 1495 female samples (3.6%) tested positive for C trachomatis infection and 88 (0.2%) tested positive for N gonorrhoeae infections. Only 31 females were coinfected; however, for those between 11 and 25 years of age, 25 of 61 females (40.1%) with N gonorrhoeae infection also tested positive for C trachomatis infection; conversely, 25 of 1248 females (2.0%) with C trachomatis infection also tested positive for N gonorrhoeae infection. For males, 213 (11.7%) tested positive for C trachomatis infection, and 59 (3.2%) tested positive for N gonorrhoeae infection. In 30 males with N gonorrhoeae between 11 and 25 years of age, and 149 males with C trachomatis, eight coinfections were observed (26.7% and 5.3%, respectively). Of those older than 25 years of age, only five of 905 men and six of 19,465 women were coinfected. None of the 10,935 women who were 30 years of age or older had coinfections. CONCLUSION: The N gonorrhoeae coinfection rate in males with C trachomatis may justify empirical antimicrobials; however, in females, the proportion of coinfected may not justify empirical treatment for N gonorrhoeae infection when the C trachomatis test is positive and N gonorrhoeae testing has not been performed.
BACKGROUND: The frequency of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae coinfection can vary depending on their individual incidence and prevalence rates. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae coinfections by evaluating the results of testing in 2007 and 2008 to better inform testing and treatment decisions. METHODS: Specimens from the same patient submitted on the same day served as the basis for the present study. The age, sex and the source of the specimen were also linked to the accession number. Infection and coinfection rates were analyzed in both males and females. RESULTS: Concurrent testing was performed on 41,567 female specimens and 1827 male specimens, of which, 1495 female samples (3.6%) tested positive for C trachomatis infection and 88 (0.2%) tested positive for N gonorrhoeae infections. Only 31 females were coinfected; however, for those between 11 and 25 years of age, 25 of 61 females (40.1%) with N gonorrhoeae infection also tested positive for C trachomatis infection; conversely, 25 of 1248 females (2.0%) with C trachomatis infection also tested positive for N gonorrhoeae infection. For males, 213 (11.7%) tested positive for C trachomatis infection, and 59 (3.2%) tested positive for N gonorrhoeae infection. In 30 males with N gonorrhoeae between 11 and 25 years of age, and 149 males with C trachomatis, eight coinfections were observed (26.7% and 5.3%, respectively). Of those older than 25 years of age, only five of 905 men and six of 19,465 women were coinfected. None of the 10,935 women who were 30 years of age or older had coinfections. CONCLUSION: The N gonorrhoeae coinfection rate in males with C trachomatis may justify empirical antimicrobials; however, in females, the proportion of coinfected may not justify empirical treatment for N gonorrhoeae infection when the C trachomatis test is positive and N gonorrhoeae testing has not been performed.
Authors: Sarah Creighton; Melinda Tenant-Flowers; Christopher B Taylor; Rob Miller; Nicola Low Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Sheryl B Lyss; Mary L Kamb; Thomas A Peterman; John S Moran; Daniel R Newman; Gail Bolan; John M Douglas; Michael Iatesta; C Kevin Malotte; Jonathan M Zenilman; Josephine Ehret; Charlotte Gaydos; Wilbert J Newhall Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-08-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Malanda Nsuami; Catherine L Cammarata; Bridget N Brooks; Stephanie N Taylor; David H Martin Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jan E A M van Bergen; Joke Spaargaren; Hannelore M Götz; Irene K Veldhuijzen; Patrick J E Bindels; Ton J Coenen; Jan Broer; Fetzen de Groot; Christian J P A Hoebe; Jan-Hendrik Richardus; Daniel van Schaik; Marije Verhooren Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2006-03-07 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Xiaojing Zheng; Catherine M O'Connell; Wujuan Zhong; Uma M Nagarajan; Manoj Tripathy; De'Ashia Lee; Ali N Russell; Harold Wiesenfeld; Sharon Hillier; Toni Darville Journal: J Immunol Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Julius Kapala; Kathy Biers; Michael Cox; Margaret Kamionka; Jeff Sumner; Ramandeep Toor; Jodi Gilchrist; Dan Jang; Marek Smieja; Max Chernesky Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2011-03-16 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Maanda Mudau; Remco P Peters; Lindsey De Vos; Dawie H Olivier; Dvora J Davey; Edwin S Mkwanazi; James A McIntyre; Jeffrey D Klausner; Andrew Medina-Marino Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Sunita Gulati; Frank J Beurskens; Bart-Jan de Kreuk; Marcel Roza; Bo Zheng; Rosane B DeOliveira; Jutamas Shaughnessy; Nancy A Nowak; Ronald P Taylor; Marina Botto; Xianbao He; Robin R Ingalls; Trent M Woodruff; Wen-Chao Song; Janine Schuurman; Peter A Rice; Sanjay Ram Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Sunita Gulati; Michael W Pennington; Andrzej Czerwinski; Darrick Carter; Bo Zheng; Nancy A Nowak; Rosane B DeOliveira; Jutamas Shaughnessy; George W Reed; Sanjay Ram; Peter A Rice Journal: mBio Date: 2019-11-05 Impact factor: 7.867