Literature DB >> 21629455

Prefabricated stock trays for impression of auricular region.

Shetty Vibha1, G N Anandkrishna, Purwar Anupam, N Namratha.   

Abstract

The conventional methods of impression making for maxillofacial defects are cumbersome and time consuming for both patient and operator. This study focuses upon standardizing and simplifying the impression making methodology for auricular prosthesis with the help of prefabricated stock trays for auricular region. The stock trays were designed on positive replicas of anatomical structures, broadly divided into long and narrow, short and broad and long and broad ear. For each stock tray, impressions of auricle, of patients of different morphology were made with plastic funnels of different shape and size ensuring at least 6 mm of space between the anatomical part and inner surface of funnel and master cast was obtained. Subsequent adaptation of wax was done and fabrications of stock stainless steel trays were done. A standardized stock tray for making of auricular impressions was developed. From this innovative technical procedure it is possible to get an accurate impression of auricular defects now by the use of prefabricated stock trays rather than the cumbersome conventional method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auricular defect; Impression; Irreversible hydrocolloid; Maxillofacial prosthesis; Stock tray

Year:  2010        PMID: 21629455      PMCID: PMC3081258          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-010-0030-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  6 in total

1.  The auricular impression: an alternate technique.

Authors:  M F Mathews; A J Sutton; R M Smith
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  An implant-retained auricular impression technique to minimize soft tissue distortion.

Authors:  Todd M Kubon; James D Anderson
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Morphological examination of ear: a study of an Indian population.

Authors:  P K Chattopadhyay; Shashi Bhatia
Journal:  Leg Med (Tokyo)       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 1.376

4.  Facial moulage fabrication using a two-stage poly (vinyl siloxane) impression.

Authors:  Abdullah S Alsiyabi; Glenn E Minsley
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  A two-stage impression technique for custom facial prostheses.

Authors:  A J Coleman; J W Schweiger; J Urquiola; K A Tompkins
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Physical properties and compatibility with dental stones of current alginate impression materials.

Authors:  H Murata; M Kawamura; T Hamada; H Chimori; H Nikawa
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.837

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  A Simplified and Easy Approach for the Fabrication of Nasal Prosthesis: A Clinical Report.

Authors:  Atul Bhandari; Purushottam Manvi; Ankit Mehrotra; Yogesh Rao
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-06-05

2.  Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Ocular Defect resulting from Pediatric Retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Suma Janya; Priyanka Gubrellay; Anupam Purwar; Shally Khanna
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2015-02-09

3.  Nasal reconstruction with silicone using customised impression technique.

Authors:  Sanath Shetty; Fahad Mohammed; Janavi Kamath; K Kamalakanth Shenoy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.