Literature DB >> 21628171

Geographic divergence in floral morphology and scent in Linanthus dichotomus (Polemoniaceae).

Sally K R Chess1, Robert A Raguso, Gretchen Lebuhn.   

Abstract

Floral reproductive morphology and scent are of primary importance to pollinators in guiding foraging decisions. We compared the floral scent and reproductive morphology between two subspecies of Linanthus dichotomus (Polemoniaceae) that are taxonomically distinguished by geography and flowering time: the vespertine L. dichotomus subsp. dichotomus and the diurnal L. dichotomus subsp. meridianus. Disparity in flowering time between the two subspecies is accompanied by differences in flower visitors. We collected floral volatiles using dynamic headspace methods and analyzed them using gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy. Together, the subspecies produced a total of 39 floral scent compounds. Subspecies differ in the quantitative pattern of volatiles that attract noctuid moths (e.g., lilac aldehydes) vs. a more general suite of visitors (e.g., phenylacetaldehyde), but not in overall scent emission rates. A discriminant function analysis correctly distinguished between the two subspecies based on scent samples 86% of the time. We measured seven reproductive morphological traits; a discriminant function analysis distinguished between the two subspecies based on morphological samples 81% of the time. We found significant differences between subspecies in scent but not in individual morphological traits. The evidence presented here is most consistent with a hypothesis of pollinator-mediated selection.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21628171     DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0800118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  8 in total

1.  Micromorphology and ultrastructure of the floral nectaries of Polemonium caeruleum L. (Polemoniaceae).

Authors:  Mirosława Chwil; Stanisław Chwil
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.356

2.  Floral divergence, pollinator partitioning and the spatiotemporal pattern of plant-pollinator interactions in three sympatric Adenophora species.

Authors:  Chang-Qiu Liu; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Are there pollination syndromes in the Australian epacrids (Ericaceae: Styphelioideae)? A novel statistical method to identify key floral traits per syndrome.

Authors:  Karen A Johnson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Floral volatile alleles can contribute to pollinator-mediated reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus).

Authors:  Kelsey J R P Byers; James P Vela; Foen Peng; Jeffrey A Riffell; Harvey D Bradshaw
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 5.  Understanding intraspecific variation of floral scent in light of evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Roxane Delle-Vedove; Bertrand Schatz; Mathilde Dufay
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  The key role of 4-methyl-5-vinylthiazole in the attraction of scarab beetle pollinators: a unique olfactory floral signal shared by Annonaceae and Araceae.

Authors:  Artur Campos Dália Maia; Stefan Dötterl; Roman Kaiser; Ilse Silberbauer-Gottsberger; Holger Teichert; Marc Gibernau; Daniela Maria do Amaral Ferraz Navarro; Clemens Schlindwein; Gerhard Gottsberger
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Can yeast (S. cerevisiae) metabolic volatiles provide polymorphic signaling?

Authors:  J Roman Arguello; Carolina Sellanes; Yann Ru Lou; Robert A Raguso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Flower volatiles, crop varieties and bee responses.

Authors:  Björn K Klatt; Carina Burmeister; Catrin Westphal; Teja Tscharntke; Maximilian von Fragstein; Maximillian von Fragstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.