Anne Bruce1, Patricia Boston. 1. School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. abruce@uvic.ca
Abstract
AIM: This article presents a discussion of the use of palliative sedation in response to intractable (not responsive to treatment) existential suffering. BACKGROUND: Patients suffering from a terminal illness are often faced with severe symptoms at the end of life. Although palliative sedation is sometimes used when no other options are effective in relieving unbearable pain or suffering, its use in response to intractable existential suffering in terminal illness remains controversial. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted for published articles addressing the use of palliative sedation between 1996 and 2009 using established databases. DISCUSSION: Palliative sedation remains an uneasy practice. The debates have centred on ethical issues surrounding decisions to use sedation and on separating the intent of palliative sedation (relief of intolerable symptoms) from the intent of euthanasia (hastening death). There is lack of consensus in defining existential suffering. Consequently, there is limited understanding of how decisions are being made when using palliative sedation to treat intractable existential suffering. CONCLUSIONS: Given the confusion and uncertainty about ethical and clinical justifications for palliative sedation in treating existential suffering, we argue that a better understanding of the controversies and decision-making process is needed. Greater understanding is required to prevent palliative sedation from becoming a substitute for intensive treatment of this kind of suffering.
AIM: This article presents a discussion of the use of palliative sedation in response to intractable (not responsive to treatment) existential suffering. BACKGROUND:Patients suffering from a terminal illness are often faced with severe symptoms at the end of life. Although palliative sedation is sometimes used when no other options are effective in relieving unbearable pain or suffering, its use in response to intractable existential suffering in terminal illness remains controversial. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted for published articles addressing the use of palliative sedation between 1996 and 2009 using established databases. DISCUSSION: Palliative sedation remains an uneasy practice. The debates have centred on ethical issues surrounding decisions to use sedation and on separating the intent of palliative sedation (relief of intolerable symptoms) from the intent of euthanasia (hastening death). There is lack of consensus in defining existential suffering. Consequently, there is limited understanding of how decisions are being made when using palliative sedation to treat intractable existential suffering. CONCLUSIONS: Given the confusion and uncertainty about ethical and clinical justifications for palliative sedation in treating existential suffering, we argue that a better understanding of the controversies and decision-making process is needed. Greater understanding is required to prevent palliative sedation from becoming a substitute for intensive treatment of this kind of suffering.
Authors: Dietmar Weixler; Sophie Roider-Schur; Rudolf Likar; Claudia Bozzaro; Thomas Daniczek; Angelika Feichtner; Christoph Gabl; Bernhard Hammerl-Ferrari; Maria Kletecka-Pulker; Ulrich H J Körtner; Hilde Kössler; Johannes G Meran; Aurelia Miksovsky; Bettina Pusswald; Thomas Wienerroither; Herbert Watzke Journal: Wien Med Wochenschr Date: 2016-12-06
Authors: Albert Balaguer; Cristina Monforte-Royo; Josep Porta-Sales; Alberto Alonso-Babarro; Rogelio Altisent; Amor Aradilla-Herrero; Mercedes Bellido-Pérez; William Breitbart; Carlos Centeno; Miguel Angel Cuervo; Luc Deliens; Gerrit Frerich; Chris Gastmans; Stephanie Lichtenfeld; Joaquín T Limonero; Markus A Maier; Lars Johan Materstvedt; María Nabal; Gary Rodin; Barry Rosenfeld; Tracy Schroepfer; Joaquín Tomás-Sábado; Jordi Trelis; Christian Villavicencio-Chávez; Raymond Voltz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sandra Kurkowski; Maria Heckel; Larissa Pfaller; Joachim Peters; Jeremias Bazata; Eva Schildmann; Christoph Ostgathe Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 3.113
Authors: Livia Anquinet; J Rietjens; A van der Heide; Sophie Bruinsma; Rien Janssens; Luc Deliens; Julia Addington-Hall; W Henry Smithson; Jane Seymour Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 3.894