Literature DB >> 21627578

Epidemiology and significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated in blood cultures from critically ill adult patients.

Mahesh B Savithri1, Vikram Iyer, Mark Jones, Trent Yarwood, David Looke, Peter S Kruger, Joan Faogali, Bala Venkatesh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little published data are available on the epidemiology and significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) in blood culture isolates among critically ill adult patients.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology and frequency of CoNS blood culture isolates in critically ill adults, and investigate the association between time to positivity (TTP) of blood cultures and number of culture-positive bottles with organ dysfunction and mortality. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective chart audit in the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital comprising all patients who had positive blood cultures for CoNS in 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: TTP, number of culture-positive bottles, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, resolution of fever and white cell response and inotrope requirement, length of stay in ICU and mortality.
RESULTS: In 2009, there were 1514 and 109 positive blood culture sets for the hospital and ICU patients, respectively. Of these, 515 sets from patients outside the ICU (34% of all hospital positive blood cultures) and 54 from the ICU (49.5% of all ICU positive blood cultures) were positive for CoNS. Patients with TTP ≤24 hours had higher organ failure scores by 0.9 (95% CI, 0-3.4; P = 0.052). There was a trend towards an association between increased 28-day mortality and TTP ≤24 hours (7/22 v 3/32; P = 0.071). There was no significant correlation between number of bottles positive for culture and mortality, length of stay, SOFA score, resolution of fever, white cell response, and inotrope requirement.
CONCLUSIONS: Early TTP of blood cultures with CoNS may be associated with poorer outcome and may be a marker of true infection. Given the relatively high frequency of this microbiological problem, larger prospective observational studies are required to more clearly define the significance of a CoNS blood culture isolates in critically ill adult patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21627578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Resusc        ISSN: 1441-2772            Impact factor:   2.159


  5 in total

1.  Number of positive blood cultures, biofilm formation, and adhesin genes in differentiating true coagulase-negative staphylococci bacteremia from contamination.

Authors:  I Papadimitriou-Olivgeri; N Giormezis; M Papadimitriou-Olivgeris; A Zotou; F Kolonitsiou; K Koutsileou; F Fligou; M Marangos; E D Anastassiou; I Spiliopoulou
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  The increased risks of death and extra lengths of hospital and ICU stay from hospital-acquired bloodstream infections: a case-control study.

Authors:  Adrian G Barnett; Katie Page; Megan Campbell; Elizabeth Martin; Rebecca Rashleigh-Rolls; Kate Halton; David L Paterson; Lisa Hall; Nerina Jimmieson; Katherine White; Nicholas Graves
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Evaluation of BD MAX Staph SR Assay for Differentiating Between Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci and Determining Methicillin Resistance Directly From Positive Blood Cultures.

Authors:  Jaewoong Lee; Yeon Joon Park; Dong Jin Park; Kang Gyun Park; Hae Kyung Lee
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Should we treat patients with only one set of positive blood cultures for extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii the same as multiple sets?

Authors:  Aristine Cheng; Yu-Chung Chuang; Hsin-Yun Sun; Chia-Jui Yang; Hou-Tai Chang; Jia-Ling Yang; Wang-Huei Sheng; Yee-Chun Chen; Shan-Chwen Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Short time to positivity of blood culture predicts mortality and septic shock in bacteremic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ya-Chu Hsieh; Hsiao-Ling Chen; Shang-Yi Lin; Tun-Chieh Chen; Po-Liang Lu
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.090

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.