Literature DB >> 21626662

Comparison of bacterial adhesion and cellular proliferation on newly developed three-dimensional scaffolds manufactured by rapid prototyping technology.

A Al-Ahmad1, C Schubert, C Carvalho, Y Thoman, A Wittmer, M Metzger, E Hellwig, W Swieszkowski, M Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad.   

Abstract

Scaffolds used in the field of tissue engineering should facilitate the adherence, spreading, and ingrowth of cells as well as prevent microbial adherence. For the first time, this study simultaneously deals with microbial and tissue cell adhesion to rapid prototyping-produced 3D-scaffolds. The cell growth of human osteosarcoma cells (CAL-72) over a time period of 3-11 days were examined on three scaffolds (PLGA, PLLA, PLLA-TCP) and compared to the adhesion of salivary microorganisms and representative germs of the oral flora (Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella nigrescens, Candida albicans, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mutans, and Streptococcus sanguinis). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), cell proliferation measurements, and determination of the colony forming units (CFU) were performed. The cell proliferation rates on PLLA and PLLA-TCP after 3, 7, and 11 days of cultivation were higher than on PLGA. On day 3 the proliferation rates on PLLA and PLLA-TCP, and on day 5 on PLLA-TCP, proved to be significantly higher compared to that of the control (culture plate). The strain which showed the most CFUs on all of the investigated scaffolds was P. gingivalis, followed by E. faecalis. No significant CFU differences were determined examining P. gingivalis among the biomaterials. In contrast, E. faecalis was significantly more adherent to PLGA and PLLA compared to PLLA-TCP. The lowest CFU values were seen with C. albicans and P. nigrescens. Salivary born aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms adhered significantly more to PLGA compared to PLLA-TCP. These results supported by SEM point out the high potential of PLLA-TCP in the field of tissue engineering.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21626662     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.33118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  3 in total

Review 1.  Cancer research by means of tissue engineering--is there a rationale?

Authors:  Raymund E Horch; Anja M Boos; Yuan Quan; Oliver Bleiziffer; Rainer Detsch; Aldo R Boccaccini; Christoph Alexiou; Jiaming Sun; Justus P Beier; Andreas Arkudas
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 5.310

2.  A Comparison of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Incorporated with Manuka Honey of Varying UMF.

Authors:  Katherine R Hixon; Tracy Lu; Sarah H McBride-Gagyi; Blythe E Janowiak; Scott A Sell
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Development of a PCL/gelatin/chitosan/β-TCP electrospun composite for guided bone regeneration.

Authors:  Masoumeh Ezati; Hamide Safavipour; Behzad Houshmand; Shahab Faghihi
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2018-09-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.