PURPOSE: To investigate the underlying cause for the observed differences in self-associating and viscoelastic behavior between two monoclonal antibodies, MAb1, and MAb2. METHODS: Several mutants were designed by swapping charged residues in MAb1 with those present in MAb2 at their respective positions and vice versa. Rheological analysis was done at low and high shear rates. Dynamic light scattering quantified intermolecular interactions in dilute solutions; sedimentation equilibrium analysis determined the corrected weight average molecular weight (M (wc)) to assess the self-associating behavior in high concentration. The molecular charge was estimated from electrophoretic mobility measurements. RESULTS: Replacing the charged residues in the CDR of MAb1 resulted in a lower M (wc) and solution viscosity. The corresponding changes in either just the variable light (VL) or variable heavy (VH) chain showed only a partial decrease in viscosity, whereas changes in both VL and VH chains resulted in a dramatic reduction in viscosity. The converse case where the VL and VH chains of MAb2 were made to look like MAb1 did not self-associate or show increased viscosity. CONCLUSIONS: Exposed charged residues in the CDR of MAb1 are critical in determining the self-associating and highly viscous behavior observed at high concentrations.
PURPOSE: To investigate the underlying cause for the observed differences in self-associating and viscoelastic behavior between two monoclonal antibodies, MAb1, and MAb2. METHODS: Several mutants were designed by swapping charged residues in MAb1 with those present in MAb2 at their respective positions and vice versa. Rheological analysis was done at low and high shear rates. Dynamic light scattering quantified intermolecular interactions in dilute solutions; sedimentation equilibrium analysis determined the corrected weight average molecular weight (M (wc)) to assess the self-associating behavior in high concentration. The molecular charge was estimated from electrophoretic mobility measurements. RESULTS: Replacing the charged residues in the CDR of MAb1 resulted in a lower M (wc) and solution viscosity. The corresponding changes in either just the variable light (VL) or variable heavy (VH) chain showed only a partial decrease in viscosity, whereas changes in both VL and VH chains resulted in a dramatic reduction in viscosity. The converse case where the VL and VH chains of MAb2 were made to look like MAb1 did not self-associate or show increased viscosity. CONCLUSIONS: Exposed charged residues in the CDR of MAb1 are critical in determining the self-associating and highly viscous behavior observed at high concentrations.
Authors: Anna Stradner; Helen Sedgwick; Frédéric Cardinaux; Wilson C K Poon; Stefan U Egelhaaf; Peter Schurtenberger Journal: Nature Date: 2004-11-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Branden A Salinas; Hasige A Sathish; Steven M Bishop; Nick Harn; John F Carpenter; Theodore W Randolph Journal: J Pharm Sci Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.534
Authors: Vikas K Sharma; Thomas W Patapoff; Bruce Kabakoff; Satyan Pai; Eric Hilario; Boyan Zhang; Charlene Li; Oleg Borisov; Robert F Kelley; Ilya Chorny; Joe Z Zhou; Ken A Dill; Trevor E Swartz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Pilarin Nichols; Li Li; Sandeep Kumar; Patrick M Buck; Satish K Singh; Sumit Goswami; Bryan Balthazor; Tami R Conley; David Sek; Martin J Allen Journal: MAbs Date: 2015 Impact factor: 5.857
Authors: Yingda Xu; Dongdong Wang; Bruce Mason; Tony Rossomando; Ning Li; Dingjiang Liu; Jason K Cheung; Wei Xu; Smita Raghava; Amit Katiyar; Christine Nowak; Tao Xiang; Diane D Dong; Joanne Sun; Alain Beck; Hongcheng Liu Journal: MAbs Date: 2018-12-17 Impact factor: 5.857
Authors: Brian D Connolly; Chris Petry; Sandeep Yadav; Barthélemy Demeule; Natalie Ciaccio; Jamie M R Moore; Steven J Shire; Yatin R Gokarn Journal: Biophys J Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Sandeep Yadav; Jun Liu; Thomas M Scherer; Yatin Gokarn; Barthélemy Demeule; Sonoko Kanai; James D Andya; Steven J Shire Journal: Biophys Rev Date: 2013-03-14
Authors: Paul Casaz; Elisabeth Boucher; Rachel Wollacott; Brian G Pierce; Rachel Rivera; Maja Sedic; Sadettin Ozturk; William D Thomas; Yang Wang Journal: MAbs Date: 2014 Impact factor: 5.857
Authors: Jayant Arora; Yue Hu; Reza Esfandiary; Hasige A Sathish; Steven M Bishop; Sangeeta B Joshi; C Russell Middaugh; David B Volkin; David D Weis Journal: MAbs Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 5.857