Literature DB >> 21625936

From the stroke unit to the stroke competence center: corresponding beneficial clinical and financial effects.

A Chatzikonstantinou1, A Förster, M G Hennerici, H Bäzner.   

Abstract

The introduction of the diagnosis related groups (DRG) system in Germany has radically influenced the organization of in-hospital patient treatment. Case-mix-index and duration of treatment in a stroke unit (SU) play a central role. Our SU started in 1998 and was gradually extended to the current "Stroke Competence Center" (SCC), with a total capacity of 29 patients. The SCC combines acute treatment, work-up and post-stroke management by the same specialized team. We aimed primarily at demonstrating the financial effects of this concept. Data from stroke patients treated in our SU/SCC between 2004 and 2009 were analyzed. We analyzed the number of treated stroke patients, number of thrombolytic treatments, the number of cases coded with procedure codes OPS 8-981.x and the ratio of OPS 8-981.0 (24-72 h on SU) to the higher remunerated OPS 8-981.1 (>72 h on SU). The number of treated patients increased by 118.3% (from 469 in 2004 to 1024 in 2009). The number of thrombolyses per year has more than quadrupled (2004: 46, 2009: 253, i.e. 25% of SU patients). The introduction of the stroke center concept lead to a great increase in the ratio of the higher rewarded OPS 8-981.1 to OPS 8-981.0 (from 1.5 in 2005 to 5.21 in 2009). Our data demonstrates that the SCC concept leads to a greater financial potential, while offering considerable medical advantages concerning more effective stroke treatment and work-up as well as improved flow of information and enhanced individual patient-physician relationship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21625936     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-011-6032-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  9 in total

1.  Recommendations for comprehensive stroke centers: a consensus statement from the Brain Attack Coalition.

Authors:  Mark J Alberts; Richard E Latchaw; Warren R Selman; Timothy Shephard; Mark N Hadley; Lawrence M Brass; Walter Koroshetz; John R Marler; John Booss; Richard D Zorowitz; Janet B Croft; Ellen Magnis; Diane Mulligan; Andrew Jagoda; Robert O'Connor; C Michael Cawley; J J Connors; Jean A Rose-DeRenzy; Marian Emr; Margo Warren; Michael D Walker
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Acute care in stroke: do stroke units make the difference?

Authors:  E Díez-Tejedor; B Fuentes
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 3.  Thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: controlled trials and clinical experience.

Authors:  W Hacke; T Brott; L Caplan; D Meier; C Fieschi; R von Kummer; G Donnan; W D Heiss; N G Wahlgren; M Spranger; G Boysen; J R Marler
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Werner Hacke; Markku Kaste; Erich Bluhmki; Miroslav Brozman; Antoni Dávalos; Donata Guidetti; Vincent Larrue; Kennedy R Lees; Zakaria Medeghri; Thomas Machnig; Dietmar Schneider; Rüdiger von Kummer; Nils Wahlgren; Danilo Toni
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Influence of direct admission to Comprehensive Stroke Centers on the outcome of acute stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis.

Authors:  Natalia Pérez de la Ossa; Mónica Millán; Juan F Arenillas; Josep Sánchez-Ojanguren; Ernest Palomeras; Laura Dorado; Cristina Guerrero; Antoni Dávalos
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Economic burden of cardiovascular diseases in the enlarged European Union.

Authors:  José Leal; Ramón Luengo-Fernández; Alastair Gray; Sophie Petersen; Mike Rayner
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials.

Authors:  Werner Hacke; Geoffrey Donnan; Cesare Fieschi; Markku Kaste; Rüdiger von Kummer; Joseph P Broderick; Thomas Brott; Michael Frankel; James C Grotta; E Clarke Haley; Thomas Kwiatkowski; Steven R Levine; Chris Lewandowski; Mei Lu; Patrick Lyden; John R Marler; Suresh Patel; Barbara C Tilley; Gregory Albers; Erich Bluhmki; Manfred Wilhelm; Scott Hamilton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The hospital costs of care for stroke in nine European countries.

Authors:  David Epstein; Anne Mason; Andrea Manca
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Case mix use in 25 countries: a migration success but international comparisons failure.

Authors:  Francis H Roger France
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.046

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  How to identify stroke mimics in patients eligible for intravenous thrombolysis?

Authors:  A Förster; M Griebe; M E Wolf; K Szabo; M G Hennerici; R Kern
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.849

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.