| Literature DB >> 21625877 |
E Jończyk1, M Kłak, R Międzybrodzki, A Górski.
Abstract
The ability of bacteriophages to survive under unfavorable conditions is highly diversified. We summarize the influence of different external physical and chemical factors, such as temperature, acidity, and ions, on phage persistence. The relationships between a phage's morphology and its survival abilities suggested by some authors are also discussed. A better understanding of the complex problem of phage sensitivity to external factors may be useful not only for those interested in pharmaceutical and agricultural applications of bacteriophages, but also for others working with phages.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21625877 PMCID: PMC3131515 DOI: 10.1007/s12223-011-0039-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Folia Microbiol (Praha) ISSN: 0015-5632 Impact factor: 2.099
Classification of bacteriophages and characteristics of their sensitivity to some external factors such as temperature, acidity, and salinity (phages described in the text are marked in bold)
| Familya | Membersa | Nucleic acid and structurea | Characteristics of phage sensitivity to some external factors |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Linear dsDNA | Phages from this family may be extremely resistant to a dry environment (desert sands) and may survive large temperature fluctuations (Prigent et al. |
|
| Non-enveloped, contractile tail, consisting of a Sheath and a central tube | Some of them (e.g., T4, C16) proved to be very resistant to long-term (for years) storage (Ackermann et al. | |
|
| Freeze-drying may be harmful for this family (Clark | ||
|
| T2—stable in pH range 5–9, with maximum at pH 5–6 (Sharp et al. | ||
|
| T4—at 37°C, stable at pH 6–7.4, unstable at pH < 5 and 9.2 (Kłak et al. | ||
|
| ΦgspC—can survive in a very salty environment (Wilson et al. | ||
| MB08 | CP-51—sensitive to low temp. (<0°C); optimum stability at 15°C; for its storage at 0°C, optimal pH is 5.6 (Thorne and Holt | ||
|
|
| Linear dsDNA | In the opinion of some authors, the members of this family are generally the most resistant to adverse conditions (Lasobras et al. |
|
| Non-enveloped, long non-contractile tail | ||
|
| Phages from this family may be extremely resistant to a dry environment (desert sands) and may survive large temperature fluctuations (Prigent et al. | ||
|
| Some of them (e.g., T5) proved to be very resistant to long-term (for years) storage (Ackermann et al. | ||
|
| Very stable when stored (for years) in freeze-dried form (Ackermann et al. | ||
| P001 | λ—good stability at 4°C for over 6 months, stable in a wide range of pH (3–11) for 24 h at 19°C, more stable in distilled water than tap water (Jepson and March | ||
| P008 | T1—resistant to drying (Faquet et al. | ||
| MB07 | TSP4—may survive at high temperatures, optimum is 65°C (Lin et al. | ||
|
|
| Linear dsDNA | Phages from this family may be extremely resistant to a dry environment (desert sands) and may survive large temperature fluctuations (Prigent et al. |
|
| Non-enveloped, short non-contractile tail | T3—at 37°C, stable at pH 5–9.2 (Międzybrodzki et al., unpublished data); its survival after freezing at −196°C was 98% (Tsutsaeva et al. | |
|
| T7—at 37°C, prefers alkaline conditions; more sensitive to lower pH than T3 (Międzybrodzki et al., unpublished data); at 0.5–2.0°C, optimal long-storage stability at pH 6–8 (Kerby et al. | ||
|
| 28B—very stable (for 6 months) in urine even at pH 9 (Höglund et al. | ||
| Kpn5 | |||
| N22 | |||
|
|
| Circular sDNA | ΦX174—its survival after freezing at −196°C was over 80% (Tsutsaeva et al. |
| Non-enveloped, isometric | |||
|
|
| Superhelical, circular dsDNA | PM2—stable at pH 6–8, virion, stability strongly dependent on NaCl (10 mmol/L minimum) and CaCl2 (5 mmol/L minimum) (Faquet et al. |
| Non-enveloped, isometric, lipid layer in capsid | |||
|
|
| Linear dsDNA | PRD1—usually stable at pH 5–8 (Faquet et al. |
|
| Non-enveloped, isometric, inner lipoprotein vesicle | AP50—for long storage, should be freeze-dried, because it may lose activity at −80°C or in broth at 4°C (Ackermann et al. | |
|
|
| Linear ssRNA | MS2 and Qβ—the lowest inactivation was observed at pH 6–8 and temperature of 5–35°C (Feng et al. |
|
| Non-enveloped, isometric | Qβ—better survival in an alkaline than acidic environment (Feng et al. | |
| MS2—unstable when suspended in ultrapure water (Governal and Gerba | |||
|
| PP7—highly thermostable (Caldeira and Peabody | ||
| f2 | |||
|
| Phi6 | Linear segmented RNA | Phi6—stable at pH 6 (ICTVdB Management |
| Lipoprotein envelope, spherical | |||
|
|
| Circular ssDNA | M13—its optimal pH is 6 and 9 and temperature 37°C (Tey et al. |
| fd | Non-enveloped, filamentous | ||
| Pf1 | |||
| Vf33 | |||
|
|
| Linear dsDNA | Members of this family can be found in acidic hot-spring environments (Prangishvili et al. |
| SIFV | Enveloped, rod-shaped | TTV1—it can survive even temperatures >85°C and pH < 3 (Goulet et al. | |
|
| SIRV1 | Linear dsDNA | Members of this family can be found in acidic hot-spring environments (Prangishvili et al. |
|
| Non-enveloped, rod-shaped | ||
|
| L2 | Circular superhelical dsDNA | L2—extremely sensitive to heat, relatively cold stable (Faquet et al. |
| Enveloped, pleomorphic | |||
|
|
| Circular superhelical dsDNA | Members of this family can be found in acidic hot-spring environments (Prangishvili et al. |
|
| Non-enveloped, lemon shaped, short spikes at one end | SSV1—stable at high temperature (up to 97°C), insensitive to pH 2 but pH < 5 reduces its viability, and virions are sensitive to pH > 11 (Faquet et al. | |
|
| |||
| His1 | His1—sensitive to exposure to low salt concentrations; to maintain stability, it should be stored in a high salt solution (18%); stable for a long time at 37°C (Faquet et al. |
aBased on Ackermann 2003; Ackermann et al. 2004; Ackermann 2007; Ackermann and Abedon 2000; Ackermann and DuBow 1987; Bettstetter et al. 2003; Buiser et al. 2009; Faquet et al. 2005; Governal and Gerba 1997; Goulet et al. 2010; ICTVdB Management 2006; McAuliffe et al. 2007; Kivelä 2004; Kumari et al. 2010; Kim et al. 2010; Lin et al. 2010; Prangishvili et al. 2001; Pringsulaka et al. 2010; Tey et al. 2009; Wachman and Brown 2010; Wilson et al. 2004