Nucleic acids promote amyloid formation in diseases including Alzheimer's and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. However, it remains unclear whether the close interactions between amyloid and nucleic acid allow nucleic acid secondary structure to play a role in modulating amyloid structure and function. Here we have used a simplified system of short basic peptides with alternating hydrophobic and hydrophilic amino acid residues to study nucleic acid - amyloid interactions. Employing biophysical techniques including X-ray fibre diffraction, circular dichroism spectroscopy and electron microscopy we show that the polymerized charges of nucleic acids concentrate and enhance the formation of amyloid from short basic peptides, many of which would not otherwise form fibres. In turn, the amyloid component binds nucleic acids and promotes their hybridisation at concentrations below their solution K(d), as shown by time-resolved FRET studies. The self-reinforcing interactions between peptides and nucleic acids lead to the formation of amyloid nucleic acid (ANA) fibres whose properties are distinct from their component polymers. In addition to their importance in disease and potential in engineering, ANA fibres formed from prebiotically-produced peptides and nucleic acids may have played a role in early evolution, constituting the first entities subject to Darwinian evolution.
Nucleic acids promote amyloid formation in diseases including Alzheimer's and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. However, it remains unclear whether the close interactions between amyloid and nucleic acid allow nucleic acid secondary structure to play a role in modulating amyloid structure and function. Here we have used a simplified system of short basic peptides with alternating hydrophobic and hydrophilic amino acid residues to study nucleic acid - amyloid interactions. Employing biophysical techniques including X-ray fibre diffraction, circular dichroism spectroscopy and electron microscopy we show that the polymerized charges of nucleic acids concentrate and enhance the formation of amyloid from short basic peptides, many of which would not otherwise form fibres. In turn, the amyloid component binds nucleic acids and promotes their hybridisation at concentrations below their solution K(d), as shown by time-resolved FRET studies. The self-reinforcing interactions between peptides and nucleic acids lead to the formation of amyloid nucleic acid (ANA) fibres whose properties are distinct from their component polymers. In addition to their importance in disease and potential in engineering, ANA fibres formed from prebiotically-produced peptides and nucleic acids may have played a role in early evolution, constituting the first entities subject to Darwinian evolution.
More than 30 polypeptides including prion, Aβ and α-synuclein proteins form
amyloid fibrils as an alternative ordered conformation and are thought to propagate
in vivo by templating the misfolding of their own monomeric
precursors in diseases including Creutzfeldt-Jakob, Alzheimer's and
Parkinson's [1], [2]. The amyloid conformation is not limited to pathologies,
but appears to be a general property of polypeptide chains [3], [4], [5]. Despite the high variation
of amyloidogenic polypeptide sequences all amyloid fibres share a common core
structure: a cross-β spine that comprises inter-molecular β-sheet strands
running perpendicular to the fibril axis [6], [7]. Formation of amyloid is
primarily mediated by main chain interactions where the probability of
inter-molecular aggregation is strongly regulated by amino acid side chain identity
and the environment [3]. A simple binary pattern of alternating hydrophobic and
hydrophilic amino acid residues correlates with an increased propensity for amyloid
formation [8],
which is used to design de novo amyloidogenic peptides and proteins
[9], [10], [11].Pathological amyloid deposits often contain polyionic interaction partners like
glycosaminoglycans, collagen and nucleic acids [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. Recent studies have shown a
critical role for polyanions such as poly(A) RNA in the conversion of
bacterially-expressed prion protein into infectious particles [18], [19]. The polymerized charges of
nucleic acids associate with basic residues on polypeptides to concentrate and
enhance their rate of amyloid formation [17]. However, the interactions of
nucleic acids with amyloidogenic polypeptides are highly complex. Amyloid fibres
from long peptide chains comprise discrete sequences forming the cross-β spine
and unincorporated sequences that decorate the core [20], [21]. More generally, it is not known
whether polyanion promotion of amyloid formation is based on direct interactions
with the core cross-β spine or indirectly via the decorating sequences.Here we use a simplified system of short basic peptides with alternating hydrophobic
and hydrophilic amino acid residues to study nucleic acid - amyloid interactions. We
show that nucleic acids promote amyloid formation from peptides, many of which would
not otherwise form fibres. In turn, the amyloid concentrates and enhances the
hybridization of associated nucleic acids. This supports the use of nucleic acid
aptamers for the modulation of amyloid fibre growth in therapy and engineering. In
our studies, strong reciprocal peptide-nucleic acid interactions lead to formation
of amyloid-nucleic acid (ANA) complexes with discrete properties from those of their
composite polymers. The formation of fibres from components present in the prebiotic
environment supports a hypothesis suggesting a potential role for ANA complexes at
an early stage in evolution.
Results and Discussion
Nucleic acids promote amyloid formation from short basic peptides
To better understand the relationship between nucleic acids and amyloid, we have
focused on the formation of amyloid from short peptides. Peptides with
alternating hydrophobic-hydrophilic residues were chosen since their presence in
proteins increases the probability that they will be incorporated into amyloid
[9].
(KL)3 and the longer (KL)5 were chosen as they formed
gels - a characteristic of amyloid - when incubated with poly(A) RNA, but
couldn't gel when incubated with equivalent levels of inorganic phosphate
[22]. The
related (HL)3 and (HL)5 sequences were chosen to allow
modulation of peptide charge over a range of pHs that were compatible with
nucleic acid hybridization. The heptamer sequence TVQFHMH was based on a
sequence present within a randomly-generated amyloidogenic protein that
contained tandem alternating hydrophobic/hydrophilic sequences [9]. The addition
of salmon testis DNA (ST DNA) or a short 33mer oligodeoxyribonucleotide to the
peptides induced an increase in Congo Red absorbance and Thioflavin T (ThT)
fluorescence that has been shown to be characteristic of the formation of
amyloid (Fig. 1 A–C,
Fig.
S1; [23]). The nucleic acid-induced changes in fluorescence
correlated with rapid gel formation (Table S1, Table S2,
Table
S3). Charge interactions were likely to be key mediators of the
nucleic acid-peptide interactions since the strength of the gels was altered by
changes in ion concentration (NaCl). Similar conclusions as to the importance of
charge interactions were drawn from studies of amyloidogenic proteins and
polyanions [17]. Histidine-containing peptide (TVQFHMH and
(HL)3): nucleic acid interactions were influenced by varying the
pH (Table
S1 and Table S2), showing greater gel formation at
pH 6.2 and 6.5 than pH 5.0 where maximal peptide charge would be expected.
(HL)3 with the highest net charge (+3 at pH 5.5; Fig. 1C) showed ThT
fluorescence compared to the corresponding DNA-only control, although the
intrinsic pH-dependence of nucleic acid-induced ThT fluorescence made pH
titrations difficult to interpret (Fig. 1C). Previous studies have shown that short peptides only form
amyloid when they have one net charge. Taken together, the observations here
suggest nucleic acids enhance the propensity of singly-charged peptides to form
amyloid and also promote amyloid formation from multiply-charged peptides that
would not otherwise interact [11].
Figure 1
Nucleic acids promote amyloid formation by short basic
peptides.
(A to C) Amyloid formation in
solution. (A) Congo Red absorbance at 544 nm
by (KL)5 complexes with salmon testis or oligonucleotide DNA.
(B and C) ThT fluorescence (in arbitrary
units) from 17 µM (KL)3 or 50 µM (HL)3
with 50 µM DNA at varying pH. Peptide-containing samples were run
in quadruplicate (mean ± s.d.), the insulin amyloid positive
control was in duplicate (mean). (D) X-ray fibre
diffraction. (KL)5, (KL)3,
(HL)5, (HL)3, and TVQFHMH with DNA or RNA show
clear cross-β patterns indicating amyloid formation. TVQFHMH was the
only peptide that could be induced to show a cross-β pattern in
absence of nucleic acid. Pure DNA gave a clear A-DNA diffraction
pattern. Residual reflections of this pattern were not apparent within
ANA complex diffraction patterns that incorporated dsDNA. The
diffraction pattern of heat-denatured DNA has lost all distinctive
features of the A-DNA pattern. Patterns were recorded at 180 mm detector
distance except for (HL)5+RNA and TVQFHMH+RNA which
was at 300 mm.
Nucleic acids promote amyloid formation by short basic
peptides.
(A to C) Amyloid formation in
solution. (A) Congo Red absorbance at 544 nm
by (KL)5 complexes with salmon testis or oligonucleotide DNA.
(B and C) ThT fluorescence (in arbitrary
units) from 17 µM (KL)3 or 50 µM (HL)3
with 50 µM DNA at varying pH. Peptide-containing samples were run
in quadruplicate (mean ± s.d.), the insulin amyloid positive
control was in duplicate (mean). (D) X-ray fibre
diffraction. (KL)5, (KL)3,
(HL)5, (HL)3, and TVQFHMH with DNA or RNA show
clear cross-β patterns indicating amyloid formation. TVQFHMH was the
only peptide that could be induced to show a cross-β pattern in
absence of nucleic acid. Pure DNA gave a clear A-DNA diffraction
pattern. Residual reflections of this pattern were not apparent within
ANA complex diffraction patterns that incorporated dsDNA. The
diffraction pattern of heat-denatured DNA has lost all distinctive
features of the A-DNA pattern. Patterns were recorded at 180 mm detector
distance except for (HL)5+RNA and TVQFHMH+RNA which
was at 300 mm.Using X-ray fibre diffraction we tested whether the aggregates formed the
characteristic cross-β diffraction pattern that is the most direct and
specific test for amyloid [24]. Strong meridional and equatorial reflections
suggested the presence of amyloid with a strong reflection close to 4.75 Å
in all samples that corresponded to the separation of the two hydrogen-bonded
chains (Fig. 1D; Table S4).
Equatorial reflections close to 10 Å were consistent with the formation of
inter-sheet interactions where the specific reflections would be dependent on
the van der Waals volumes of the amino acid side chains [3]. To try to identify the
source of the additional reflections that were detected, we compared the
diffraction patterns of the amyloid-nucleic acid (ANA) complexes with pure DNA
and peptide samples prepared under similar conditions. Unfortunately, with the
exception of TVQFHMH, none of the peptides could be induced to form fibres in
the absence of nucleic acids (between pH 5 and 8). Incubating TVQFHMH at pH 11
followed by titration to pH 6 induced the formation of a gel that was preceded
by the induction of small peptide aggregates. The nucleic acid-free TVQFHMH
diffraction pattern showed a characteristic cross-β pattern that lacked some
of the additional reflections found in the equivalent ANA complex. However,
comparison of these additional reflections with the DNA fibre diffraction
pattern did not identify patterns that were consistent with a simple co-linear
alignment of amyloid and DNA fibres (Fig. 1D; Table
S4).To confirm the presence of amyloid, the ultrastructural organization of the
various ANA complexes was examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
Fibres with minimal diameters ranging from 3.0 nm to 9.9 nm, larger diameter
tapes and occasional aggregates were detected only following incubation of each
of the peptides with DNA or RNA (Fig. 2A, Fig. S2, Fig. S3;
Table
S5). The minimal dimensions of the (KL)5-DNA fibres were
consistent with the size of a single amyloid-nucleic acid fibre complex as
modelled in Fig.
S4. To determine whether the fibres were comprised of both peptide
and nucleic acid, fluorescein-labelled (HL)3 and Atto550-labelled
salmon-testis DNA were mixed with unlabelled stocks at low molar ratios
(1∶20) prior to formation of the ANA complexes. All fibres detected by
confocal microscopy contained co-linear peptide and nucleic acid fluorescence,
suggesting intimate association between the two molecules (Fig. 2B and 2C). The absolute intensity of
fluorescence in each channel varied slightly between different fibrous regions,
which is probably due to incomplete mixing during the rapid formation of the
gels. Taken together, the fibre diffraction, TEM and confocal microscopy data
suggest that nucleic acids strongly promote the formation of amyloid from short
basic peptides and the resulting ANA complexes contain nucleic acid that is
closely associated with the cross-β spine of the amyloid fibril. To
distinguish between ‘structural’ and ‘catalytic’ roles
for nucleic acid in ANA complex formation, the effects of trace levels of
nucleic acid on amyloid formation were examined by CD spectrometry. The singly
charged peptideSTVIIE was used because it has previously been shown to
spontaneously form amyloid over a 7 day time course without the need for
equimolar amounts of nucleic acid, that were found to produce a CD signal that
interfered with the assessment of β-sheet formation [11]. Addition of a
1∶3300 molar ratio of a 33mer oligonucleotide to STVIIEpeptide
(1∶100 charge ratio) accelerated and enhanced the random to β-sheet
transition while leading to formation of amyloid fibres that were
indistinguishable by TEM analysis from peptide-only structures (Fig. 3). Taken together with
the observation that a 1∶1 charge ratio was required for rapid gel and
amyloid formation (Table S1, Table S2,
Table
S3, Figure S1), these data suggest that highly charged peptides require
nucleic acid in both a ‘structural’ role as part of the final ANA
complex, but also in a ‘catalytic’ role in the nucleation and/or
extension of amyloid fibrils [17].
Figure 2
Fibre formation and colocalisation of nucleic acid and peptides in
ANA complexes.
(A) Electron microscopy. TEM images of ANA
complexes showing the fibres formed by (KL)5,
(HL)5 and TVQFHMH with DNA and (KL)4,
(KL)3 and (HL)3 with poly(A) RNA at the
indicated pHs. Scale bars are 300 nm. (B) Confocal
microscopy. Representative confocal images of
(HL)3-DNA ANA complexes where peptide and DNA samples had
previously been spiked with fluorescently labelled variants.
(HL)3 spiked 1∶20 with FITC-(HL)3; DNA
spiked 1∶20 with nick-translated ATTO550-DNA. Peptide and DNA
colocalised in large fibrillar complexes. The structures at pH 5.0 were
generally finer than the ones at pH 6.5. Scale bars are 10 µM.
(C) Confocal control samples. Top row:
unlabelled (HL)3 mixed with labelled ATTO550-DNA-spiked
salmon testis DNA. Bottom Row: FITC-(HL)3-spiked
(HL)3 with unlabelled salmon testis DNA. No bleed-through
was detected between the fluorescence channels. Scale bars are 10
µM.
Figure 3
DNA oligonucleotides promote and accelerate amyloid
formation.
(A and B) CD spectra time course of STVIIE
(0–24 h as shown) without (A) and with
(B) 1∶100 DNA (charge ratio) 33mer
oligonucleotide. DNA accelerates and enhances the random coil (minimum
at 198 nm) to β-sheet (minimum at 218 nm) transition.
(C and D) Time courses of the ellipticity
at 198 nm (blue; random coil minimum) and 218 nm (red; β-sheet
minimum) for STVIIE without (C) and with (D)
1∶100 DNA oligonucleotide. (E and F)
Electron micrographs of STVIIE amyloid fibrils produced with
(E) and without (F) 1∶100 DNA
oligonucleotide. Scale bars are 500 nm.
Fibre formation and colocalisation of nucleic acid and peptides in
ANA complexes.
(A) Electron microscopy. TEM images of ANA
complexes showing the fibres formed by (KL)5,
(HL)5 and TVQFHMH with DNA and (KL)4,
(KL)3 and (HL)3 with poly(A) RNA at the
indicated pHs. Scale bars are 300 nm. (B) Confocal
microscopy. Representative confocal images of
(HL)3-DNA ANA complexes where peptide and DNA samples had
previously been spiked with fluorescently labelled variants.
(HL)3 spiked 1∶20 with FITC-(HL)3; DNA
spiked 1∶20 with nick-translated ATTO550-DNA. Peptide and DNA
colocalised in large fibrillar complexes. The structures at pH 5.0 were
generally finer than the ones at pH 6.5. Scale bars are 10 µM.
(C) Confocal control samples. Top row:
unlabelled (HL)3 mixed with labelled ATTO550-DNA-spiked
salmon testis DNA. Bottom Row: FITC-(HL)3-spiked
(HL)3 with unlabelled salmon testis DNA. No bleed-through
was detected between the fluorescence channels. Scale bars are 10
µM.
DNA oligonucleotides promote and accelerate amyloid
formation.
(A and B) CD spectra time course of STVIIE
(0–24 h as shown) without (A) and with
(B) 1∶100 DNA (charge ratio) 33mer
oligonucleotide. DNA accelerates and enhances the random coil (minimum
at 198 nm) to β-sheet (minimum at 218 nm) transition.
(C and D) Time courses of the ellipticity
at 198 nm (blue; random coil minimum) and 218 nm (red; β-sheet
minimum) for STVIIE without (C) and with (D)
1∶100 DNA oligonucleotide. (E and F)
Electron micrographs of STVIIE amyloid fibrils produced with
(E) and without (F) 1∶100 DNA
oligonucleotide. Scale bars are 500 nm.
Amyloid enhances nucleic acid hybridisation
To investigate how amyloid may alter nucleic acid function, we examined whether
ANA complexes could influence DNA hybridization. Results from initial approaches
to measuring DNA hybridization were frustrated by the interference of the
peptide components with many dsDNA detection methods. To overcome these
difficulties, we used time-resolved Förster resonance energy transfer
(TR-FRET) to measure the hybridization of an 11 bp ssDNA overlap between two
oligonucleotide pairs (Fig.
4A). ANA complexes formed from (HL)3 and TVQFHMH were used
because they were found not to quench the probe fluorophores and their charge
could be modified by altering their pH. The histidine-containing peptides
carried a +2 net charge, that in combination with a 2∶1 charge ratio
(peptide: nucleic acid) generated the strongest gels (Table S1).
Clear TR-FRET from the donor to the acceptor fluorophore was detected in the
presence of an (HL)3 ANA complex showing the fluorophores were
brought within the Förster radius (<6.4 nm; Figure 4B). Importantly, no TR-FRET was
observed when the acceptor oligonucleotide or the single-strand DNA overlap was
absent, suggesting that the TR-FRET signal represented specific hybridization
(Fig. 4B). The affinity
of the 11 bp interaction (in the presence of a saturating concentration of 150
mM NaCl; Fig.
S5) was determined by titration of the 11 bp overlap oligonucleotides
and found to be 96 nM (Fig.
4C). A similar titration showed that the presence of an
(HL)3-DNA ANA complex strongly enhanced the affinity of the 11 bp
oligonucleotides (18 nM versus 96 nM; Fig. 4C). When assayed below the
K
d (20 nM or 50 nM oligonucleotides) the
presence of (HL)3-DNA or TVQFHMH-DNA ANA complexes strongly promoted
hybridization, whereas a mixture of the negatively charged peptide
(EL)3 and DNA or additional DNA alone failed to increase
hybridization (Fig. 4D).
Taken together with the microscopy observation that peptides and nucleic acid
are intimately associated, these data are consistent with the idea that the ANA
complex rather than free peptide enhances DNA hybridization. Experimental and
theoretical models have suggested that adsorption of nucleic acids to surfaces,
here formed by an amyloid fibre increases the affinity of hybridization by
promoting 2D diffusion [25], [26]. Furthermore, dextran-poly-L-lysine block co-polymer
conjugates were suggested to promote hybridization by increasing local DNA
concentrations and increasing the nucleation of hybridisation [27]. The promotion
of hybridisation by charged surfaces also lies at the heart of a proposed role
for clay surfaces in prebiotic evolution [28], [29].
Figure 4
Amyloid promotes hybridisation of nucleic acids.
(A) Schematic of the 11 bp overlap and 0 bp overlap control
DNA hybridisation probes. (B) Faster donor and delayed
acceptor fluorophore dynamics were observed with 11 bp compared to 0 bp
overlap probes. Data shown from 100 nM oligonucleotides mixed with a
preformed 1 mM (HL)3-DNA ANA complex at pH 6.2.
(C) (HL)3-DNA ANA complexes enhanced the
affinity of the 11 bp interaction. Pre-formed (HL)3 ANA
complexes were mixed with probe oligonucleotides in the presence of 150
mM NaCl, 10 mM MES pH 5.5. (blue curve: (HL)3 ANA complexes,
K
d = 18 nM±6
nM s.d. (n = 22, r = 0.48);
red curve: buffer,
K
d = 96 nM±23 nM
s.d. (n = 21, r = 0.816)).
(D) Basic ANA complexes increased hybridisation at low
11 bp probe oligonucleotide concentrations. (HL)3 and
TVQFHMH, but not (EL)3 peptides, in the presence of DNA
enhanced the hybridisation of 20 nM and 50 nM probes.
Amyloid promotes hybridisation of nucleic acids.
(A) Schematic of the 11 bp overlap and 0 bp overlap control
DNA hybridisation probes. (B) Faster donor and delayed
acceptor fluorophore dynamics were observed with 11 bp compared to 0 bp
overlap probes. Data shown from 100 nM oligonucleotides mixed with a
preformed 1 mM (HL)3-DNA ANA complex at pH 6.2.
(C) (HL)3-DNA ANA complexes enhanced the
affinity of the 11 bp interaction. Pre-formed (HL)3 ANA
complexes were mixed with probe oligonucleotides in the presence of 150
mM NaCl, 10 mM MES pH 5.5. (blue curve: (HL)3 ANA complexes,
K
d = 18 nM±6
nM s.d. (n = 22, r = 0.48);
red curve: buffer,
K
d = 96 nM±23 nM
s.d. (n = 21, r = 0.816)).
(D) Basic ANA complexes increased hybridisation at low
11 bp probe oligonucleotide concentrations. (HL)3 and
TVQFHMH, but not (EL)3 peptides, in the presence of DNA
enhanced the hybridisation of 20 nM and 50 nM probes.
Was there a role for ANA fibres in prebiotic Darwinian evolution?
The data presented here support a hypothesis that suggests a role for ANA fibres
in prebiotic development. In this model, growth, nucleic acid replication and
division were proposed to follow simple charge and hydrophobic interactions
between short prebiotically-produced nucleic acids and basic peptides [30], [31], [32], [33].The promotion of hybridisation by charged surfaces lies at the heart of a
proposed role for clay surfaces in prebiotic evolution. Clay particles have been
suggested to promote hybridisation and act as compartments that enabled RNA
replicases from the ‘RNA-world’ to restrict their enzymatic activity
towards co-localised and therefore genetically-related nucleic acids [28], [29]. A simple
extension of this model involves the idea that amyloid fibres fulfilled a
similar role as a charged surface for nucleic acid replication as previously
suggested [30]
(Fig. 5).
Figure 5
Interlocking cycles of amyloid growth and nucleic acid
replication.
(1) Nucleic acids recruit short basic amyloidogenic peptides
to the growing end of the amyloid fibril primarily through charge
interaction with the phosphate backbone. (2, 3) With
increasing length, the amyloid fibrils become vulnerable to hydrostatic
forces, eventually causing them to shear. This generates daughter
fibrils that inherit associated and therefore related nucleic acids.
(4–6) The amyloid fibril promotes nucleic acid
replication by enhancing hybridization. (7) Inter and
intra-molecular hybridization allows nucleic acids to adopt secondary
structures, some of which may enhance the incorporation of amyloidogenic
peptides. Further selection for nucleic acids that promote amyloid
elongation or replication could evolve ribosome-like or
polymerase/ligase-like activities respectively.
Interlocking cycles of amyloid growth and nucleic acid
replication.
(1) Nucleic acids recruit short basic amyloidogenic peptides
to the growing end of the amyloid fibril primarily through charge
interaction with the phosphate backbone. (2, 3) With
increasing length, the amyloid fibrils become vulnerable to hydrostatic
forces, eventually causing them to shear. This generates daughter
fibrils that inherit associated and therefore related nucleic acids.
(4–6) The amyloid fibril promotes nucleic acid
replication by enhancing hybridization. (7) Inter and
intra-molecular hybridization allows nucleic acids to adopt secondary
structures, some of which may enhance the incorporation of amyloidogenic
peptides. Further selection for nucleic acids that promote amyloid
elongation or replication could evolve ribosome-like or
polymerase/ligase-like activities respectively.An amyloid fibre that bound a nucleic acid would, unlike a clay particle, be able
to grow through the recruitment of basic amyloidogenic peptides to free ends.
Growing, and therefore longer, ANA fibres would be likely to be sheared by
hydrostatic forces, resulting in the production of daughter fibres that would
inherit related nucleic acids.The data support aspects of this ‘ANA-world’ model of early Darwinian
evolution. Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3 show that mutual interactions between
nucleic acids and peptides enhance the growth of fibres comprised of amyloid and
nucleic acid (ANA fibres). Fig.
4 shows that ANA complexes can promote nucleic acid hybridisation
that is a prerequisite for nucleic acid replication. Fig. S3
shows an EM image of long ANA fibres that appear to have sheared in places,
consistent with the effects of hydrostatic shear promoting ANA fibre division as
has previously been suggested for vesicle shearing [34].
Conclusions
The presence of both double and single stranded nucleic acids within
ANA-complexes raises the possibility that nucleic acid sequence and secondary
structure could alter the rate or specificity of amyloid growth. Intriguingly, a
recent study showed that in vitro generated PrPsc
amyloid selectively associated with a subset of RNA molecules to which it was
exposed [18]. Multiple roles could be played by amyloid associated
nucleic acids. In engineering, RNA or DNA aptamers could be used to control the
growth of nanoscale fibres [20]. In therapy, similar nucleic acid structures could
prevent the formation of toxic amyloid species [35]. Fibre-associated RNAzymes
might be developed to block the growth of disease-associated amyloid or direct
it to a less toxic species.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
Peptides (HL)3 (HLHLHL), (HL)5 (HLHLHLHLHL),
(KL)3 (KLKLKL), (KL)5 (KLKLKLKLKL), TVQ (TVQFHMH),
(EL)3 (ELELEL) and fluorescein-labelled FITC-(HL)3
were purchased at 95% purity from GL Biochem (PR China) or Peptide 2.0
(USA). Peptides were dissolved in 20 mM HCl and dried twice to remove residual
TFA as previously described [36], [37] the pH was adjusted to 6.0 with NaOH and dialyzed
against water (MWCO 100–500 celluloseester membrane; Spectrum
Laboratories, UK) to remove residual salt. Peptide concentrations were verified
using an OPA assay for free amine groups (Pierce). Salmon testis DNA and poly(A)
RNA were obtained from Sigma (UK). The peptideSTVIIE was obtained HPLC-purified
from Severn Biotech (UK). It was solubilized in 50% Methanol/water pH 11,
freeze-dried and redissolved in 20 mM glycine pH 10 to create the stock
solution. Prior to use it was sonicated for 10 minutes (bath sonicator) and
centrifuged for 10 minutes at 4°C at 16,100 rcf.
Peptide charges
The charges on the peptides were calculated using the Peptide Property Calculator
provided by GenScript website (GenScript UK; www.genscript.com),
resulting in the following net charges: (HL)3 has +1 charge at
pH 6.8, +2 charges at pH 6.2, and +3 charges at pH 5.0.
(HL)5 has ±0 charge at pH 8.0, +1 charge at pH 7.0,
+2 charges at pH 6.5, +3 charges at pH 6.2, and +4 charges at pH
5.5. (KL)3 is at +3 charges below pH 8.5, and (KL)5
has +5 charges below pH 8.5. TVQFHMH has ±0 charges at pH 7.6,
+1 charge at pH 6.5, +2 charges at pH 5.0. The negatively charged
control peptide (EL)3 carries a −3 net charge in the range of
the pHs explored in this paper (pH 5.0 to pH 8.0). pH titrations were carried
out on several peptides to verify predictions (Fig. S6).
The peptideSTVIIE has previously been calculated to have a net charge of
+1 at pH 2.6 [11].
Preparation of ANA complexes
ANA complexes were formed immediately prior to assay by pipetting equal volumes
of buffered peptides and nucleic acids to generate the final concentrations
described. Unless otherwise indicated all DNA was double-stranded and from
salmon testis and all nucleic acid concentrations relate to the molarity of the
phosphates. 10 mM MES was used for assays below pH 7.0 while 10 mM HEPES was
used at higher pHs. When necessary, the gels or aggregates were broken down
using a pestle to allow pipetting.
Gel strength
To evaluate gel strength, 10 µl of ANA complex solution was aspirated using
a calibrated Gilson P20 pipette over a period of 2 seconds (no filter tip). A
“strong gel” was defined as one that could not be pipetted since it
consisted mainly of a large gel clump. A “normal strength” gel was
either sucked up slower than buffer or did not reach the calibrated 10 µl
level in the pipette tip. A “weak gel” was aspirated to the expected
height within the 2 seconds, but showed anomalies in the meniscus indicating
reduced flow.
Dye-binding assays
Enhanced Congo Red absorbance at 544 nm of (KL)5 ANA complexes (0.2 mM
(KL)5, 1 mM salmon testis or oligonucleotide DNA, 10 mM HEPES pH
8.0 and 50 µM Congo Red dye) was measured using a BMG FLUOstar OPTIMA
plate reader. Values were normalized to the mean of the absorbances at 485 and
450 nm. Thioflavin T fluorescence of peptides/nucleic acids in 10 mM MES buffer
was measured as previously described [23]. The insulin amyloid
positive control was prepared by incubating 1 mM bovinepancreas insulin (Sigma,
UK) in 10 mM hydrochloric acid for 3 days at 65°C followed by neutralization
to pH 7 with NaOH. 50 µM insulin amyloid was used in assays.
Time-resolved Thioflavin T assay
The measurements were taken on a BMG FLUOStar as described above (Nilsson 2002).
The buffer was 150 mM NaCl in 10 mM MES pH 6.5 (+1 net charge on
(HL)3, −3 net charge on (El)3), including 50
µM Thioflavin T. Of the DNA solution in buffer, 100 µl were injected
at 420 µl per second to the 100 µl peptide solution in buffer,
yielding 500 µM (HL)3+500 µM DNA final
concentrations (1∶1 charge ratio). The temperature was recorded, but not
controlled by the instrument, and was in the range of 27 to 30°C. The full
program consists of the following steps:The background level was determined by 5 measurements at 5 measurements per
second followed by the injection of the salmon testes DNA within 1.7 seconds and
a short orbital shaking for mixing (1 s). The ThT fluorescence immediately after
injection and shaking was recorded in 200 ms steps for 40 s (200 data points),
followed by 5 s steps for 225 s (45 data points).
X-ray fibre diffraction
Drops of ANA complex solutions were placed between 2 beeswax-covered capillaries
and allowed to dry to align the fibrillar material. Starting gels were formed
from 5 mM (KL)5, 5 mM DNA, 10 mM HEPES pH 7, 150 mM NaCl; 16 mM
(HL)5, 10 mM poly(A) RNA pH 6; 1.6 mM TVQFHMH, 1.6 mM DNA, 10 mM
MES pH 5.0; 10 mM (KL)3, 10 mM DNA; 5 mM (HL)3, 5 mM DNA,
10 mM MES pH 6.2; 1.6 mM TVQFHMH (gel formed after titration to pH 11 then down
to pH 6 using NaOH and HCl respectively); 20 mM unbuffered DNA; 20 mM unbuffered
single-stranded DNA (DNA denatured by heating to 95°C and rapid cooling on
ice water immediately before stalk preparation); 16 mM TVQFHMH, 10 mM poly(A)
RNA pH 6.0; 16 mM (KL)3, 10 mM DNA (unbuffered). The resulting stalks
were placed vertically in the x-ray beam of a Rigaku RU-H3R rotating anode x-ray
generator (Cu Kα with 1.5418 Å wavelength), and the
diffraction pattern was recorded on a Rigaku R-AXIS IV flat plate detector with
180 or 300 mm sample to detector distance and an exposure time of 10 to 20
minutes. The diffraction pattern was extracted with ImageJ [38] from the proprietary file
format used by the Rigaku CrystalClear software (version 1.40) and the Bragg
spacings determined with WCEN [39], [40].
Transmission Electron Microscopy
The following ANA complexes were formed: 0.2 mM (KL)5, 0.25 mM
(KL)4 or 0.33 mM (KL)3 solutions with 1 mM DNA or
poly(A) RNA, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.0 as indicated; 1 mM (HL)5 or
(HL)3 or TVQFHMH with 1 mM DNA or poly(A) RNA, 10 mM MES at the
indicated pHs; 5 mM (HL)3 or 0.25 mM (KL)4 with 5 mM or 1
mM poly(A) RNA with 10 mM MES pH 6.2 or 10 mM HEPES pH 7.0; 5 mM
(HL)3 or (HL)5 or TVQFHMH or 1 mM (KL)5
with 5 mM DNA with 150 mM NaCl in 10 mM MES/HEPES at the pHs indicated; 5 mM
TVQFHMH with 150 mM NaCl in 10 mM MES pH 6.5. Following a 1∶2 dilution in
buffer when necessary the samples were adsorbed onto Pioloform-coated copper 50
meshes or carbon-coated Formvar-coated copper 200/300 meshes and stained with
2% uranyl acetate as previously described [23], and examined on a Philips
EM 208 or Philips CM12 electron microscope.
Confocal Microscopy
FITC-(HL)3 was spiked into (HL)3 (1∶20 ratio) to
generate a 12 mM (HL)3 working solution. Salmon testis DNA was
labelled by nick-translation incorporating ATTO 550 nucleotides using a
nick-translation kit (Jena Biosciences, Germany). Unincorporated nucleotides
were removed by gel filtration. ATTO550-DNA was spiked into salmon testis DNA
(1∶20 ratio) yielding a 5 mM (phosphate) working solution. Equal volumes
of 5 mM DNA and 12 mM (HL)3 solutions were mixed directly on the
slide for imaging. A coverslip was added and the samples sealed with clear nail
varnish before imaging. Pictures were taken with a Leica DM6000B upright
microscope with a ×63 oil objective using a galvanometer-driven high
precision Z-stage. The bleed-through controls were prepared as described above,
but the DNA or the (HL)3 component were not spiked with the
fluorophore-labelled derivative.
Circular Dichroism
20 mM STVIIE in 20 mM glycine pH 10.0 was diluted 1∶25 in 20 mM glycine pH
2.6 (carboxy group buffering) to yield 0.8 mM peptide with a measured pH of 2.6.
Where indicated, the 33mer DNA oligonucleotide was premixed with the dilution
buffer to yield a final concentration of 242 nM (8 µM with respect to
phosphate). Samples were analysed in parallel in matching cuvettes (1 mm path
length) using an Applied Photophysics Chirascan Circular Dichroism spectrometer
from 190 to 260 nm (1 nm step size, integration over 2.5 seconds per step) every
30 minutes for 24 hours at 20°C. Background of buffer without or with DNA (3
averaged spectra) was subtracted, and the spectra were set to 0 mdeg ellipticity
at 260 nm to remove baseline shift.
TR-FRET
DNA hybridization oligonucleotides used for TR-FRET (Donor probe: CTGGGTGTAGCTGATCTAAGATCGCTAAC
with TGCTGAAGAGCTGAAGTTAGCGATCTTAGATCAGCTACACCCAGTCAC for an 11
bp overlap or CACTGACCACTTACTGATGCTCGATCGAATCTCGCTC for a 0 bp overlap;
Acceptor probe: C
with GCTCTTCAGCACTCGCTCTAAGCTAGCTCGTAGTCATTCACCAGTCAC for an 11
bp overlap or TGAAGTTAGCGATCTTAGATCAGCTACACCCAGTCAC for a 0 bp overlap)
were synthesized with label on the underlined bases where ATTO 488 and ATTO 550
were present on donor and acceptor oligonucleotides respectively. Donor and
acceptor oligonucleotide pairs were cartridge-purified (Biomers.net, Germany)
and separately hybridized in 150 mM NaCl to generate 50 µM stock solutions
by heating to 95°C followed by slow cooling.ANA complexes in 10 mM MES, 150 mM NaCl were mixed with an equal volume of the
probe oligonucleotides to generate final concentrations of 1 mM peptide, 1 mM
DNA, 10 mM MES, 150 mM NaCl at pHs shown. Both DNA hybridization probes were
used at the same concentration, ranging from 20 to 800 nM. The proportion of
donor: acceptor pair hybridization was determined by time-resolved FRET using
time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC). A laser source provided ∼50
ps pulses with 20 MHz repetition rate at 473 nm (Becker & Hickl GmbH,
Germany). Photon counting electronics (SPC-150, Becker & Hickl GmbH,
Germany) were connected to a Hamamatsu H7422P-40 photomultiplier. The time
resolution of the system was ∼250 ps. The fluorescence signal was collected
over a typical integration time of 30 seconds (10 to 300 seconds).FRET occurs when donor fluorophore ATTO 488 and acceptor fluorophore ATTO 550 are
brought within their Förster radius (6.4 nm; Atto-Tec, Germany) by
hybridization of the probes. This causes a faster fluorescence decay of the FRET
donor and a delayed rise and delayed decay of acceptor fluorescence. The amount
of bound donor, i.e. amount of hybridization, was extracted from the time course
of the fluorescence donor by dividing with a reference time course derived from
samples containing donor alone before using an exponential model (eq. 1) for
fitting using OriginPro 8 (OriginLab, USA).This yielded the ratio R of
bound to unbound donor probes, which was used to determine the amount of
hybridization f, and the concentration of free donor
c from the starting concentration
c, via equations 2 and
3.
The
dissociation constant K
d was determined by fitting
f over the concentration of free donor to a hyperbolic
saturation curve (eq. 4) with f
max as maximum
hybridization.To determine the NaCl-dependence of
hybridization, the hybridization probes were used at 500 nM each, a
concentration about 5× higher than the Kd, thereby ensuring
that only the concentration of NaCl was a limiting factor for hybridization. The
NaCl concentration was varied from 1.125 mM to 1 M. Measurements were taken as
described above. A Hill curve (equation 5) was fitted through the data points
for visualization purposes.
Molecular Modelling
To visualize a possible structure of ANA complexes a molecular model of 16
(KL)5 peptide strands in cross-β configuration between 2 DNA
molecules was created. The model was generated on a MacPro dual 2.66 GHz Xeon
running Ubuntu 9.10. The peptides were built using the protein builder included
in the Molecular Operating Environment (MOE 2008.10; Chemical Computing Group,
Montreal, Quebec, Canada; http://www.chemcomp.com) as
β-sheets. The individual peptides were manually oriented initially in an
anti-parallel sheet conformation and then minimized using the Amber99 force
field until a RMSD gradient of 0.05 kcal mol−1
Å−1 was reached, applying a distance constraint (2.5
Å to 3.5 Å – weight 100) to the appropriate hydrogen bonds
between the individual peptides. Two sheets of 8 peptides were then positioned
with the hydrophobic faces in contact and the system was further minimized as
described above. Two double stranded DNA chains (PDB: 1BNA; [41]) were then
put in contact with the polar faces of the peptide sheets and the system was
minimized. To further relax the DNA-peptide complex, a short molecular dynamic
simulation was carried out using Gromacs [42] with the Amber force
field [43].
Initially, the system was solvated in a cubic box and appropriately neutralized.
A steepest descent algorithm was used for the minimization of the solvated
system and then a 250 ps molecular dynamics simulation was performed, in an NPT
environment (293 K; 1 atm), applying a position restrain to all atoms. The
coordinate of the final molecular dynamic step was analysed using VMD [44].Kinetics of amyloid formation of (HL) A solution of peptide (red) or buffer (blue) was
injected with salmon testes DNA to detect differences in the time course of
Thioflavin T fluorescence. (A) The peptide (HL)3 in
complex with salmon testes DNA shows a clear increase in ThT fluorescence
after injection of salmon testes DNA within the 270 seconds of measurements.
The sudden jumps and irregularities in ThT fluorescence levels may be
explained by incomplete mixing or air bubbles created during the injection
of the salmon testes DNA solution distorting the signal. (B)
The peptide (EL)3 displays no increase in ThT fluorescence in the
same time scale, showing that it is not able to form amyloid in complex with
salmon testes DNA.(TIFF)Click here for additional data file.Additional TEM images. Fibre formation of insulin amyloid and
various ANA complexes as indicated. Scale bars are 300 nm.(TIFF)Click here for additional data file.Composite TEM image of a TVQFHMH-DNA fibre. The sample was
prepared from 5 mM TVQFHMH with 5 mM DNA at pH 5.0 and directly imaged
without dilution. Scale bar is 1 µM×10 nm.(TIFF)Click here for additional data file.Model of a (KL) A model of a 16-peptide (KL)5 antiparallel
amyloid fibril with two DNA strands was generated based on a previous model
of an amyloid fibril formed from proteins with tandem 7mer hydrophobic -
hydrophilic sequences [9]. Highly dynamic interactions between DNA and
amyloid were observed during a short dynamic simulation. The DNA is 2.0 nm
in diameter, the peptide backbone ∼3.1 nm (N- to C-terminal) and the
β-sheet sandwich ∼2.6 nm across (ε-amino group to ε-amino
group on lysine residues).(TIFF)Click here for additional data file.Hybridisation promotion by NaCl. Hybridisation of the DNA probes
reaches a saturation plateau at about 150 mM NaCl. 500 nM of donor and
acceptor hybridisation probes were incubated with at 1.125 mM to 1 M NaCl at
room temperature for 30 minutes before measurement. A Hill curve (red; eq.
5) with a Hill coefficient of
n = 1.4±0.1 s.d. and a
dissociation constant k = 53
mM±3 mM s.d. NaCl was fitted to the n = 9 data
points (r2 = 0.996), indicating half-maximal
saturation at 50 mM NaCl. There is some cooperativity as indicated by a Hill
coefficient of n>1.(TIFF)Click here for additional data file.Peptide titration curves. The peptides (HL)3
(A), (HL)5 (B), (KL)3
(C), (KL)5 (D) and TVQFHMH
(E) were titrated with NaOH, and the peptide
(EL)3 was titrated with HCl (F).(TIFF)Click here for additional data file.Observations of gel formation for varying peptide : nucleic acid charge
ratios. Peptides (KL)5, TVQFHMH (TVQ) or
(HL)3 were diluted to the indicated concentrations and mixed
with equal volumes of salmon testes DNA at the indicated concentrations. All
samples were prepared in 10 mM MES pH 6.8 giving the peptides the following
net charges: (HL)3 and TVQFHMH +1, (KL)5 +5.
Mixtures were monitored for strength and speed of gel formation. Seq,
Sequence; Obs, Observations. Absence of gel is denoted by /.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.pH dependence of gel formation by peptides. Peptide net charges
were altered by varying the pH of the buffer (10 mM MES, 150 mM NaCl).
Peptides were mixed with equal volumes of salmon testes DNA or poly(A) RNA.
Mixtures were monitored for strength and speed of gel formation. Decreasing
NaCl concentration (150 mM to 75 mM) increased gel strength. Seq, Sequence;
Obs, Observations. Absence of gel is denoted by /.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.Gel formation by KL peptides and RNA from different sources.
Peptides (KL)3, (KL)3.5 or (KL)4 were
diluted to the indicated concentrations and mixed with equal volumes of
poly(A) RNA or Baker's Yeast (BY) RNA at the indicated concentrations.
All samples were prepared in 10 mM MES pH 6.8. Mixtures were monitored for
strength and speed of gel formation. Seq, Sequence; Obs, Observations.
Absence of gel is denoted by /.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.Reflexions of X-ray fibre diffraction experiments. The Bragg
spacings of the reflections are given in Å and are marked as
meridional (m), equatorial (e), ring (r) or salt ring/spots (s). ds, double
stranded; den., denatured. Reflections shown in italics: very weak.
Unlabelled reflections, especially from the DNA samples, cannot be assigned
to an orientation.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.Diameters of ANA fibres. Fibre diameters were determined using
ImageJ from the fibres shown in figure 2
[38].
Three measurements were taken on clearly defined fibres with a distance of
at least twice the diameter between measurement sites. Measurements were not
taken of large diameter fibres/aggregates. Diameters are in nm ±
standard deviation.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: R N Lewis; E J Prenner; L H Kondejewski; C R Flach; R Mendelsohn; R S Hodges; R N McElhaney Journal: Biochemistry Date: 1999-11-16 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Andrew J Baldwin; Reto Bader; John Christodoulou; Cait E MacPhee; Christopher M Dobson; Paul D Barker Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2006-02-22 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Allisandra K Rha; Dibyendu Das; Olga Taran; Yonggang Ke; Anil K Mehta; David G Lynn Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Michael J Russell; Laura M Barge; Rohit Bhartia; Dylan Bocanegra; Paul J Bracher; Elbert Branscomb; Richard Kidd; Shawn McGlynn; David H Meier; Wolfgang Nitschke; Takazo Shibuya; Steve Vance; Lauren White; Isik Kanik Journal: Astrobiology Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Kristian Le Vay; Emilie Yeonwha Song; Basusree Ghosh; T-Y Dora Tang; Hannes Mutschler Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2021-11-09 Impact factor: 16.823
Authors: Rosa Sánchez; Javier Martínez; Ana Castro; María Pedrosa; Santiago Quirce; Rosa Rodríguez-Pérez; María Gasset Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Moran Frenkel-Pinter; Jay W Haynes; Ahmad M Mohyeldin; Martin C; Alyssa B Sargon; Anton S Petrov; Ramanarayanan Krishnamurthy; Nicholas V Hud; Loren Dean Williams; Luke J Leman Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-06-19 Impact factor: 14.919